19
and the previous research
that has been detailed, the following hypothesises
will be tested:
Hypothesis 1
•
There will be some relationship between paranormal beliefs and
religious beliefs.
Hypothesis 2
•
Women will show greater global paranormal belief than men.
Hypothesis 3
•
The personality factors expected to correlate with paranormal belief are
Neuroticism and Extraversion.
Hypothesis 4
•
The personality factors expected to correlate with religiosity are
Agreeableness and Conscientiousness (Psychoticism in the three factor
model).
2. METHOD
2.1. DESIGN
The study was a repeated measurements design, which used the
questionnaire survey method. The independent variable was the
participant’s beliefs (paranormal or religious) while the dependent variable
was the participant’s scores on the scales of paranormal beliefs, religious
beliefs and personality factors.
20
2.2. PARTICIPANTS
An opportunity sample of 69 participants was selected and completed the
questionnaire, the majority of which were undergraduate psychology
students from Manchester Metropolitan University. Participants ranged in
age from 18 to 56 years (M = 27.83, S. D. = 10.88). The ratio of males to
females was 31:69 (or 20 males to 45 females). Participants who had three
or more missing values on either the paranormal belief scale (RPBS), the
religiosity beliefs scale (PCBS) or the personality scales were excluded from
further analyses. In total, four of the participants questionnaire results had
to be removed leaving N = 65.
2.3 MATERIALS
The constructs of paranormal belief, religious belief and personality were
assessed by the following procedures:
2.3.1 PARANORMAL BELIEF SCALE
The revised Paranormal Belief Scale (RPBS) by Tobayck (1988, 1991) is a
26 item self-report scale, which measures the following seven forms of
paranormal beliefs: traditional religious belief, psi belief, witchcraft,
superstition, spiritualism, extraordinary life forms and precognition.
Responses to each item are scored on a seven-point Likert scale with a
higher rating indicating stronger endorsement. Tobayck and Milford (1983)
reported satisfactory reliability and validity using the original form of the
PBS. The test-retest-reliability for the subscales was improved in the
revision, but the internal consistency of the revised PBS was not reported
(Tobayck, 1991). See Appendix 1 for the complete set of questions
2.3.2 RELIGIOUS BELIEF SCALE
21
The Post-Critical Belief scale
4
(PCBS) was used to measure the religiosity
of participants (Duriez et al., 2000). The scale consists of 33 items,
providing measurements of Orthodoxy (e.g. ‘Only a priest can give an
answer to important religious questions’), External Critique (e.g. ‘In the end,
faith is nothing more than a safety net for human fears’), Relativism (e.g.
‘Secular and religious conceptions of the world give valuable answers to
important questions about life’) and Second Naiveté (e.g. ‘The Bible holds a
deeper truth which can only be revealed by personal reflection’). Fontaine
et al. (2003) have found that this scale also provides measurements of the
basic religiosity dimensions that Wulff (1991, 1997) identified. Hence, in
this way the effects of being religious or not (Exclusion vs. Inclusion of
Transcendence) can be separated from the way in which religious contents
are processed (either in a literal or symbolic manner). The items were
scored on a seven point Likert scale. Also, the validity of the PCBS
construct has been tested. Duriez, Fontaine and Hutsebaut (2000) stated that
it provides accurate measurements of Wulff’s four approaches to religion.
Finally, a high score on Exclusion vs. Inclusion of Transcendence indicates
a tendency to include transcendence. A high score on Literal vs. Symbolic
indicates a tendency to deal with religion in a symbolic way.
2.3.3 PERSONALITY SCALE
A 50 question version of the NEO-PI-R, based upon the Five Factor Model
(FFM), was used in this study and this instrument is backed by a
considerable amount of literature (for a review see Costa and McRae, 1992)
showing good evidence for validity and reliability. The questionnaire
statements are marked on a seven point scale, again with higher scores
indicating stronger endorsement. The five scales that are measured include
4
The PCBS was originally administered in Dutch but has since been translated into
English. The translation was done according to the guidelines of the International Test
Commission (Hambleton, 1994), using the back-translation procedure (Brislin, 1980).
Differences between the back-translated and the original version were minimal. A
committee of bilingual research assistants decided on the final English version (Van de
Vijver and Lueng, 1997).