100
the Dwarfs can’t trace back to you. Fiddle, fetch me the deadly poison things” (White
143-4; emphasis added). As Hex plots out the next steps of the play’s action, offering a
couple of poison antidotes and disguises, the queen and her jealousy are brushed aside,
peripheral, rather than the locus of the action they should be. It is Hex who manipulates
the play’s actions with Brangomar no more than a pawn in the game.
Without Hex, the
queen is an empty-headed jealous figure, stymied into inaction by her stupidity. The
characters in the play rely on Hex
42
just as the audience does. Subsequent actions of the
play are only ascertained by following this central character—a now essential figure who
had no place at all in the (Grimms’) “classic” version of Snow White. Here, a
reader/viewer looks toward White’s/Ames’ new character and key
Snow White
innovation, in the same way that he/she inspects the stage directions of the playwright.
White/Ames calls readers/viewers to see the play through Hex’s
and his own eyes and
figures her character and the text of the play in such a way as to give the audience little
choice but to comply.
Owning
Snow White
Although White/Ames contributes to the romance and humor that Merington’s
play showcases also inserting gendered representations in ways that were more keenly
attuned to American culture and a wider American audience, in each of these elements, as
42
In the final scene, the Prince and Snow White do not come together until “The Witch” (since turned into
a reputable character at court) gives her blessing, “You’re just
a dear sweet little girl, and that’s good
enough for any man, prince or pauper.” After this she gestures for the Prince to offer Snow White a ring,
“Put it on, Florimond. […] Now, young man, lead her to the throne and crown her properly, and we’ll all
swear allegiance to our new little Queen” (230-231).
101
well as with the insertion of additional characters, White/Ames also provides a distinctive
version of the
Snow White
tale which has not been told in the same way before or since,
without reflecting on
Ames as
the creator
. In “Winthrop Ames: The Gentleman as
Producer-Director,” MacArthur provides a detailed study of Ames in these roles. He
asserts that as a producer, Ames was a “genius” in the “imaginative execution and skillful
direction […] of his productions” (MacArthur 351). MacArthur likewise notes that “his
[(Ames’)] strong personality completely dominated everything he accomplished in the
theatre”; “The artistic details which other producers left to their staff
had to be personally
supervised by Ames or performed solely by him” (MacArthur 350). Having such a heavy
hand in each of his productions (attending to “new lights and lighting effects”, set design
and costumes, and examining the effects and details within a performance “from every
angle” in the theatre itself), was the result of a college education at “Harvard, [where] he
studied art, music,
English literature, drama, and architecture” and developed a
“scholarly” interest in theatre (350). Here, he gained the foundation for his domination of
two of New York’s major theatres. All of this background is significant to Ames’
individuation of the
Dostları ilə paylaş: