22
Irina M. Agibova, Tatyana А. Kulikova, Natalya А. Poddubnaya, Olga V. Fedina / Proceedings IFTE-2020
experiment, the students’ readiness was evaluated according to the following components: motivational,
cognitive, technological.
To determine the motivational component of student readiness, a questionnaire was conducted, during
which it was found out that for most first master's course students a positive attitude towards the use of AR-
technologies in teaching pupils is characteristic.
The cognitive component of readiness was evaluated in the course of monitoring students’ work according
to the following parameters: the ability to independently determine the need for using digital technologies
in the lesson; correctly select digital instruments, depending on the purpose of the lesson; ability to work
with educational
and popular science literature; the ability to independently apply the knowledge of AR-
technology in practice.
The technological component of readiness is assessed by the necessary knowledge, skills and abilities to
use the hardware and software of AR-technologies in the education process at school.
The level of formation of all the indicated components individually for each
student made it possible to
diagnose the initial level of readiness in general for first master’s course students.
An analysis of the data obtained at the ascertaining stage showed that first master’s course students have
not high enough formation level of digital competency.
There was a contradiction between the interest shown by students in augmented reality technologies and a
low level of knowledge in this area. This also confirmed our conclusion about the necessity of experimental
training, taking into account the level of readiness of students, and justified the choice of appropriate
technology.
The formative stage
The formative experiment was
aimed at clarifying the role, place and didactic capabilities of augmented
reality technology tools in the development of digital competence of a future physics teacher, the
development of formation technology of digital competence in the conditions of informatization and
digitalization of modern pedagogical education.
We
agree with the researchers, Grebenyuk (2000), Kraevsky and Polonsky (2001), who believe that in a
pedagogical experiment it is quite difficult to achieve equalization of the composition of parallel groups
taking into account the level of initially available knowledge and initially formed skills to distinguish the
Irina M. Agibova, Tatyana А. Kulikova, Natalya А. Poddubnaya, Olga V. Fedina / Proceedings IFTE-2020
23
experimental and control groups. Therefore,
in our research, we found it possible to abandon the
comparative experiment and evaluate the effectiveness of the technology of independent work of students,
fixing the changes that occur at individual stages of the study.
The control stage
Diagnostics of digital competency formation level was determined by the results of a series of control
slices. For the obtained quantitative data, was used the χ2
- criterion, which allows to compare the
percentage distribution of the data. The boundary value of χ2 - the criterion, corresponding to two degrees
of freedom (m = 3) and a probability of an admissible error of 0.05, is 5.99, which allows us to conclude
that there are significant changes in the level of digital competence and confirms the validity of the research
hypothesis.
Monitoring the development of digital competence was divided into three stages, the results were compared
after studying each of the disciplines and after passing pedagogical practice.
The dynamics of the readiness level of a future teacher to use AR-technologies in professional activities is
shown in Fig. 2. This allowed us to conclude that the proposed technology is effective.
Fig. 2. Diagram showing the dynamics of the preparedness of future teachers for the application of AR-
technology in professional activity
An empirical research made it possible to verify the effectiveness of the developed technology for the
development of digital competence of a future physics teacher in the conditions of informatization and
digitalization of modern pedagogical education.