____________________
1Fontaine, "The Use of the Traditional Saying in
the Old Testament," pp. 103, 258, 304.
2Gordon, Sumerian Proverbs, p. 18. He is followed
by Khanjian, "Wisdom in Ugarit," pp. 9-11, 68, 94, 209.
Khanjian gives useful definitions for each of the above
(pp. 9-11). Vid. ch. II for examples of each of these.
(10) precepts; and (11) "righteous sufferer" poems.1
Second, in biblical studies, two scholars have
greatly contributed to the discussion of wisdom forms.
Nel develops over fourteen types and Crenshaw, with his
usual meticulousness, discusses the following types: (1)
proverb; (2) riddle; (3) fable and allegory; (4) hymn and
prayer; (5) dialogue; (6) confession (autobiographical
narrative); (7) lists (onomastica), and (8) didactic
narrative (e.g., the Joseph story).2 The purpose of this
study is not to scrutinize the details of each of the
forms, but to survey them in order to provide a Sitz im
Literatur for the detailed analysis of the proverbial
"sayings" (Aussagen) in Proverbs 10-15.
While there were numerous form types in the
repertoire of the wise man, Proverbs employs basically two
genres: (1) the wisdom admonition or instruction
(Mahnwort); and (2) the sentence or saying (Aussage).3
Nel and Crenshaw see many more sub-types. However, the
difference is one of definition of genre or sub-genre and
____________________
1E. I. Gordon, "A New Look at the Wisdom of Sumer
and Akkad," BO 17.3-4 (May-July 1960):124. Cf. Perdue,
Wisdom and Cult, p. 93.
2Crenshaw, "Wisdom," pp. 229-62. He also gives
extensive bibliography at the beginning of his discussion
of each form.
3McKane, Proverbs, p. 3; and Robert Chisholm,
"Literary Genres and Structures in Proverbs" (An
unpublished paper submitted to Dr. Donald Glenn, Dallas
Theological Seminary, 1980), p. 1.
of classification, rather than one of lack of perception.
So Crenshaw develops, along with the admonition and
saying, three other types of Proverbs: (1) numerical; (2)
comparison; and (3) antithetic proverb.1 The point here
is not to analyze the methods of classification or to
discern, if possible, the distinction between stylistic
devices, thematic/semantic types, and bona fide literary
genres, but is simply to surface the tremendous variety of
structures employed by the sages.
Some writers opt for a topical approach to the
proverbs, which are collected, "systematized," and
classified by their message or imagery.2 McKane uses a
rather forced division into: Class A--old wisdom for
living a harmonious life; Class B--focusing on the
concerns of the community; and Class C--proverbs
containing "God-language." This division is so artificial
and fragmentational to the unity of the canonical order as
to need little criticism other than an exposure to the
text itself.3 More semantically related forms may be
seen
____________________
1Crenshaw, "Wisdom," p. 230; Nel, "The Genres of
Biblical Wisdom Literature," pp. 129-30.
2Kenneth J. Jensen, Wisdom: The Principal Thing
(Seattle: Pacific Meridian Pub. Comp., 1971). Derek
Kidner, Proverbs: an Introduction and Commentary, in
Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries (Downers Grove, IL:
Inter-Varsity Press, 1964), pp. 31-56 is also quite a
helpful digest of a topical sort (God and man; wisdom, the
fool, the sluggard, the friend, words, the family, and
life/death).
3McKane, Proverbs, p. 11. Kovacs,
in the comparative or better proverbs, "like" proverbs,
paradoxes, YHWH and king proverbs, 'asre sayings, and even
numerical sayings.
The problem of distinguishing between genre and
proverb type may be traced back to the debate over the term
masal itself.1 Crenshaw notes that the term
not only refers to similitudes (Ez 16:44; Gen 10:9; I
Sam 10:11), but also to popular sayings (Jer 23:28;
31:29; I Sam 24:13; Is 32:6; I Kings 20:11), literary
aphorisms (Prov 10:1-22:16; 25-29); Qoh 9:17-10:20),
taunt songs (Is 14:4; Mic 2:4; Hab 2:6-8; Ez 12:22-23;
18:2-3), bywords (Deut 28:37; I Kings 9:7; Jer 24:9;
Ez 14:8), allegories (Ez 17:1-10; 20:45-49; 24:3-14),
and discourses (Num 23:7, 18; 24:3-24; Job 27:1; 29:1;
Ps 49:4; 78:2).2
The survey of forms used in wisdom will begin with
broad genre types found under the general rubric of
"wisdom."
Examination of General Wisdom Forms
Onomastica
The onomastica (lists) seem to be the wise man's
attempt to use language to order his world in an
____________________
"Sociological-Structural Constraints," p. 293 and Bullock,
An Introduction to the Old Testament Poetic Books, p.
181-82 both object to McKane, although Bullock
unfortunately returns to a simplistic topical arrangement,
which is also problematic.
1Eissfeldt (Der Maschal im Alten Testament) sees
it etymologically as being "to compare" and "to rule."
McKane views it more as a "paradigm" or "model" (Proverbs,
pp. 22-33).
2Crenshaw, "Wisdom," p. 230.
encyclopedic manner by compiling numerous connected
phenomena into long lists. These would then be copied and
learned by the scribal students. The onomastica may
reflect the believed connection between name of the item
listed and its essence.1
The onomastica in Egypt date from the Middle
Kingdom (ca. 2000 B.C.) to the Ptolemaic period. The
purpose of this type of text is voiced in the "Onomasticon
of Amenope":
Here begins the teaching, in order to expand the mind,
to teach the ignorant, to know everything that is:
what Ptah created, what Thoth brought into being, the
sky and its objects, the earth and what is in it, what
the mountains spew forth, what Nun covers, all things on
which Re shines, everything that grows on the back of
the earth, conceived by Amenope, scribe of the holy
books in the House of Life.2
Amenope's list contains 610 items which are grouped into
categories such as: the sky, water and earth, persons and
occupations, towns, buildings and their parts, beverages,
parts of an ox, and kinds of meat.3 Much earlier the
Sumerians had apparently devised similar types of
____________________
1Harvey, "Wisdom Literature and Biblical Theology
(Part One)," p. 315; and Kovacs, "Sociological-Structural
Constraints," p. 235.
2Williams, "Scribal Training in Ancient Egypt," p.
219; cf. A. H. Gardiner, Ancient Egyptian Onomastica, 3
vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1947); Scott, The
Way of Wisdom, p. 34; cf. also "The Instruction of Duauf,"
in Pritchard, ANET, pp. 432-34.
3Heaton, Solomon's New Men, p. 114; Murphy, Wisdom
Literature, p. 11; also his "The Interpretation of Old
Testament Wisdom Literature," p. 291.
collections and passed them down to the Babylonians, who
utilized them in keeping the Sumerian language alive.1
Although the connection between the onomastica
and various Israelite texts (Ps 104; Job 28; 36:27-37:13;
Sir 38:24-39:11; and possibly even Gen 1 and 10) is not
without its difficulties, von Rad makes an interesting
comparison, tabulating the Onomasticon of Amenope, Job 38,
Psalm 148, Sirach 43, and the Song of the Three Children,
each of which demonstrates list features.2 The Wisdom of
Solomon 7:17-20 may also allude to this type of learning
among the wise of its time when it says,
For it is he who gave me unerring knowledge of what
exists, to know the structure of the world and the
activity of the elements; the beginning and end and
middle times, the alternations of the solstices and the
changes of the seasons, the cycles of the year and the
constellations of the stars, the natures of animals and
the tempers of wild beasts, the powers of spirits and
the reasonings of men, the varieties of plants and the
virtues of roots . . . .3
Numerous scholars have made the connection between the
onomastica and statements made about Solomon's encyclopedic
knowledge of trees, birds, reptiles, and fish, such as
____________________
1Scott, The Way of Wisdom, p. 36; Kovacs,
"Sociological-Structural Constraints," p. 234; Schmid,
Wesen und Geschichte, pp. 97-98; Albrecht Alt, "Solomonic
Wisdom," in SAIW, p. 107.
2von Rad, "Job XXXVIII and Ancient Egyptian
Wisdom," in SAIW, pp. 267-91. This article may also be
found in von Rad's book, The Problem of the Hexateuch and
Other Essays (London: Oliver & Boyd, 1965), pp. 281-91.
3Cited in Crenshaw, "Wisdom," pp. 258-59.
1 Kgs 4:33 [MT 5:13]. It is interesting that the next
verse points out the international appreciation of
Solomon's wisdom.1 Crenshaw notes the disparity between
the topics discussed in 1 Kings 4:32-33 [MT 5:12-13] and
that which is actually recorded of Solomon's wisdom. He
suggests that these verses do not necessarily need to be
understood in light of the onomastica; rather they may be
understood in relation to the fables and animal proverbs
which are found in the canonical wisdom corpus.2
Finally, while Roth denies the connection between
the numerical proverbs (Prov 30:29-31; 24-28) and the
onomastica, Crenshaw suggests that onomastic thinking may
be behind the formulation of numerical proverbs.3
Riddle
Who has woe? Who has sorrow?
Who has strife? Who has complaints?
Who has needless bruises? Who has bloodshot eyes?
Answer:
Those who linger over wine,
who go to sample bowls of mixed wine
(Prov 23:29-30)
The riddle is an intriguing form which has been
examined in detail on a structural level in folklore
____________________
1Bryce, A Legacy of Wisdom, p. 164; and Nel, "The
Genres of Biblical Wisdom Literature," p. 135.
2Crenshaw, Old Testament Wisdom, pp. 50-51.
3W. M. W. Roth, Numerical Sayings in the Old
Testament: A Form Critical Study, in VTSup 13 (1965), p.
25; and Crenshaw, Old Testament Wisdom, p. 39.
studies. A riddle has been defined as "a traditional
verbal expression which contains one or more descriptive
elements, a pair of which may be in opposition; the
referent of the elements is to be guessed at."1 Crenshaw
specifies the two key elements of a riddle are: (1) a clue
element, and (2) a snare or block element, which conceals
the answer to the question.2 The riddle is often founded
on a metaphor which maps one category onto another. It
differs from the proverb in that a riddle has both given
and hidden terms, while the proverb lacks the hidden term.
That is not to say that a proverb may not double as a
riddle or that its two elements may not be transformed into
a given and hidden sequence.3
It is suggested that the riddle may have functioned
in several capacities in ancient Israel. Muller notes the
following types of riddles: (1) popular riddle (Judg
____________________
1Dundes, Analytic Essays in Folklore, pp. 97-98;
Robert A. Georges and Alan Dundes, "Toward a Structural
Definition of the Riddle," Journal of American Folklore 76
(April-June 1976):111-18; and D. G. Blauner, "The Early
Literary Riddle," Folklore 78 (Spring 1967):49-58.
2Crenshaw, "Impossible Questions, Sayings, and
Tasks," Semeia 17-19 (1980):20. Also see Crenshaw's
helpful bibliography on riddles in "Wisdom," pp. 239-40.
An example of the clue/block sequence may be seen in the
following rather "corny" riddles: "Something has an ear
and cannot hear (corn)"; "What has eyes but can't see?
(potatoes)"; "What has a mouth but doesn't eat? (a river)";
and "What has leaves but doesn't grow? (a table)."
3Barley, "A Structural Approach to the Proverb and
Maxim," p. 739; Dundes, Analytic Essays in Folklore, p.
108.
14:10-18) which would be used at festive occasions;
(2) symbolic dreams or enigmatic oracles which often occur
in a prophetic contexts (Ezek 17:1-10; Isa 5:1-8; Dan 5;
Gen 37:40-41); (3) royal contests where the riddle
challenged one's brilliance (1 Kgs 10); and possibly (4)
court-school wisdom riddles (Prov 1:6).1 Thus, riddles may
have operated in diverse sociological contexts and literary
settings in the Old Testament.
The lack of explicit use of riddles in the wisdom
literature has led some to surmise a connection between the
numerical proverb and the riddle.2 Roth, proffers the
suggestion that "both are born out of the recognition that
one does not know but wishes to know." Both also suppose a
question and call for an answer. The numerical saying,
however, is more comprehensive and serious, pulling
together perceptions about numerous integrative items,
while the riddle focuses on one specific, and often
curious, connection.3
____________________
1H.-P. Muller, "Der Begriff 'Ratsel' im Alten
Testament," VT 20 (1970):465-89, especially p. 475;
Crenshaw, "Wisdom," pp. 243-44; and Khanjian, "Wisdom in
Ugarit," p. 11.
2Murphy, Introduction to the Wisdom Literature of
the Old Testament, p. 8. He suggests that Sir 25:1-2, 7-10
is a riddle. H. Torczyner ("The Riddle in the Bible," HUCA
1 [1924]:135) sees riddles underlying the numerical
proverbs of Proverbs 30.
3Roth, Numerical Sayings in the Old Testament, p.
96.
Thompson notes the bond between riddles and
didactic intentions in China and Africa. Proverbial pairs
are used in a riddling fashion by the teacher who cites one
line or one proverb and the student is to respond with a
matching one.1 Numerous proverbs have been shown to have
riddle origins. Proverbs 16:24 is easily transformed into
a riddle when it requests, "What are pleasant like a
honeycomb, giving sweetness to the soul and health to the
body?" The answer is "pleasant words."2 von Rad rejects
the riddle as a Gattung because of the diversity of its
settings, but accepts Proverbs 23:29f. as being in a riddle
form.3
Thus the following reasons are given in support of
a connection between wisdom and riddles: (1) Solomonic use
of riddles (1 Kgs 10:1); (2) statements in the text (Prov
1:6); (3) suggested possible riddles in Proverbs; (4) the
didactic function of the riddle which has been observed in
numerous cultures; and (5) its presence elsewhere in the
biblical corpus (Judg 14:13, 14). The infrequent explicit
use of the riddle in the canonical wisdom materials,
however, remains a puzzle itself.
____________________
1Thompson, The Form and Function, pp. 32,
92.
2Ibid., p. 75. He also cites Prov 20:17 and 22:1
as examples.
3von Rad, Wisdom in Israel, p. 37. He also
views Sir 22:14 as a riddle.
Allegory and Fable
Drink water from your own cistern,
running water from your own well
(Prov 5:15).
But the vine answered,
'Should I give up my wine, which cheers both gods and men,
to waving over the trees?'
(Judg 9:13)
Two more forms of wisdom which do not appear very
much in the biblical wisdom material are the fable and
allegory. Fundamentally, they both are extended
metaphors--intended to teach or entertain by a reflective,
comparative process. The fable is well-known throughout
the ancient Near East in wisdom settings. For example, the
Turin Love Songs in Egypt portray a sycamore tree and a
moringa tree describing their excellencies in promoting
love. The sycamore obtained the upper hand as the tree
favored by Hathor, the goddess of love.1
The scribes in Sumer used natural phenomena to
elucidate matters of life for their students via the fable
form.2 Examples of this form which have been preserved
____________________
1W. C. van Wyk, "The Fable of Jotham in its Ancient
Near Eastern Setting," in Studies in Wisdom Literature, ed.
W. C. van Wyk, OTWSA 15 and 16 (1972-73), pp. 90-91. The
Egyptian text is found in W. K. Simpson, The Literature of
Ancient Egypt, pp. 312-15. For more discussion of the
fable vid. R. J. Williams, "The Fable in the Ancient Near
East," in A Stubborn Faith, ed. E. C. Hobbs (Dallas:
Southern Methodist University Press, 1956), pp. 3-26.
2Wyk, "The Fable of Jotham in its Ancient Near
Eastern Setting," p. 93; and Gadd, Teachers and Students in
the Oldest Schools, p. 39.
from Sumerian schools include: "The Dispute between Summer
and Winter," "The Dispute between Cattle and Grain," and
"The Dispute between the Tree and the Reed."1 Akkadian
schools also employed this form in the "Dispute Between the
Date Palm and the Tamarisk."2 Often the topics of
discussion were political. Crenshaw notes that, while it
is possible that the references to Solomon's wisdom
concerning natural phenomena (1 Kgs 4:33 [MT 5:10]) may
refer to this genre, they are more likely to reflect the
onomastica.3
No fables appear in the extant Israelite wisdom
literature; yet its presence in historical texts
demonstrates its existence in Israelite society.
Allegories do appear in Proverbs 5:15-23 and Ecclesiastes
12:1-6. Israel undoubtedly used the animal world to teach.
Although obviously not a fable, the sluggard is admonished
to go to the ant and be instructed (Prov 6:6).
Hymn
The hymn is a form which is usually found embedded
in another unit. Wisdom hymns often deal with the "cosmic
____________________
1Kramer, The Sumerians, p. 218.
2Pritchard, ANET, pp. 410-11. For other examples
vid. Lambert, Babylonian Wisdom, pp. 150-212.
3Crenshaw, "Wisdom," p. 245; cf. von Rad, Wisdom in
Israel, p. 44.
transcendence of wisdom" (Prov 1:20-33; 8:22ff.; Job 28;
Sir 24; Wis 6:12-20; 7:22-8:21). The hymnic element
provides a link (in topic and in form) between the wisdom
books and the wisdom Psalms (cf. Ps 34, 112, 128). The
hypostatization of ma'at and the creation concept in
Egyptian hymns are taken by Kayatz as evincing an Israelite
dependence on Egyptian forms (vid. the wisdom hymn in Prov
8). While the concept of the hypostatization of wisdom in
the text of Proverbs is highly problematic, the parallels
with Egyptian hymns of this sort do provide an interesting
point of comparison.1
Dialogue and Imagined Speeches
You will say,
'How I hated discipline!
How my heart spurned correction!
I would not obey my teachers
or listen to my instructors
I have come to the brink of utter ruin
in the midst of the whole assembly'
(Prov 5:12-14).
The dialogue (Streitgesprach) is a form which
characterizes the book of Job. The dialogue form is also
observed in the "Babylonian Theodicy." Interestingly
enough, it is constructed as a wisdom poem in acrostic
____________________
1Christa Kayatz, Einfuhrung in die
alttestamentliche Weisheit, Biblische Studien 55
(Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1969), pp. 70-78.
Cf. Crenshaw, "Wisdom," pp. 248, 254; and von Rad, Wisdom
in Israel, p. 209.
form.1
Crenshaw discusses "imagined speeches," which
appear repeatedly in the early chapters of Proverbs
(1:11-14, 22-33; 4:3-9; 5:12-14; 7:14-20; 8:4-36; 24:30-34;
et al.) and are often coincident with hymnic expressions.2
Parallels may be drawn from the prophetic speeches in which
ridicule (Prov 1:26), calling and not being heard (Prov
1:24; Mic 3:4; Isa 65:12), and seeking and not finding
(Prov 1:28; Hos 5:6, 15; Amos 8:12) are common to the
occasions when wisdom opens her mouth.3
The "I-style," (also called "confession" or
"autobiography") narrative is rather unique in the Old
Testament.4 The "I-style" brings both the student and
teacher to observe life in situs and adds the necessary
personal touch and direction to the educational process.
It also inculcates the sharpening of observational and
reasoning skills. The autobiographical style highlights
the modeling role of the instructor. This form is common
in Egyptian texts ("The Instruction for King Merikare" and
"The Instruction of Amenemhet") as well as in Babyonian
____________________
1Lambert, Babylonian Wisdom Literature, pp.
21-91; Pritchard, ANET, pp. 596-604.
2Crenshaw, "Wisdom," p. 256.
3Murphy, Wisdom Literature, pp. 51-52.
4von Rad, Wisdom in Israel, p. 37; and Murphy,
Wisdom Literature, p. 51.
texts (e.g., Ludlul bel Nemeqi).1 Crenshaw notes that the
call of the autobiographical narrative is to the "house of
instruction" in Sirach (33:16-18; 51:13-22) and suggests
that autobiographical confessions were used by teachers to
demonstrate their credentials.2 This form provides a
fascinating connection between narrative patterns and
proverbial poetic forms.
Proverbial Forms
Having briefly surveyed the larger structures
Dostları ilə paylaş: |