employed by the wise men, attention should now be turned to
those forms which are characteristic of the book of
Proverbs in particular. This will provide a backdrop for a
more exacting syntactical analysis of the sentence
literature. One should not view the sentence literature as
the sole means of wisdom expression; rather, it should be
seen as one literary technique among many which the wise
men could activate to articulate their message. It is also
important to note the size of the literary units employed
by the wise men. As the sentence literature is examined,
it will be important to remember that the sages had
appreciation for and skill with larger literary units.
They did not think just in terms of fragmentary, isolated
____________________
1Perdue, Wisdom and Cult, pp. 108-9; and Crenshaw,
"Wisdom," p. 256.
2Crenshaw, "Wisdom," p. 258.
sentences which incarcerated a truth without regard to its
integration with other perceptions of reality or to the
literary context in which the sentence was found.
In the discussion of proverbial form, there is a
rather undefined mixing of categories. Nel has wrestled
with this problem and has concluded that the line
separating a genre (Gattung) and a literary device is a
very fine one.1 The separation of semantic and structural
features has not been fixed within studies on wisdom
literature. Thus, wisdom studies have discussed structural
features such as rhetorical questions, quotations (and
wellerisms), acrostics, and "there is . . . but . . . ."
Other studies have classified proverbs on a more semantic
level (paradoxical proverbs), often according to the
presence of certain cue words (like, Yhwh, abomination,
'asre [macarisms]). Though the isolation of these
categories has been helpful in appreciating the various
forms/devices which are repeatedly employed by the wise
men, yet the lack of a stable methodology has encouraged an
open-ended multiplication of categories, which could become
counter-productive and ripe for Occam's razor. This
proliferation of categories is particularly true of the
semantic level which is so multifarious. Even the
syntactic level, which is more limited in the number of
variations it may employ, is often used with such great
____________________
1Nel, The Structure and Ethos, p. 7.
variety as to defy an exact boxing into neat categories
(as will be demonstrated). The "better-proverbs," for
example, may vary the order of the elements and the
syntactic forms used to fill the slots (nouns,
infinitives, whole clauses). Deletions also may alter the
alleged "fixed" structure itself. Thus, in the following
listing of devices and proverbial types, one should not
overlook the transformations and variations of these
structures. A meticulous examination of each form is
outside of the focus of this paper. This study will
merely survey the forms and cite recent work done on each.
It is an attempt to express an appreciation for
structures/devices which are found repeatedly in Proverbs
and to gain an aesthetic sensitivity for the literary nuts
and bolts of the wise men's craft. This sensitivity
should help the interpreter not only to think the writer's
thoughts after him but as he thought them.
The book of Proverbs may be divided according to
the literary structures it manifests. These are:
1:7-9:12 Wisdom Teachings
10:1-22:16 Two-line antithetical proverbs
22:17-24:24 Many forms (e.g., four-line
proverbs)
25:1-29:27 Two-line antithetical proverbs
and comparative proverbs
30:1-31:9 Two/four-line proverbs and
numerical proverbs
31:10-31 Acrostic poem.1
____________________
1Bullock, An Introduction to the Old Testament
Poetic Books, p. 170.
Many have seen basically two types of sentence
literature in Proverbs (although to classify the whole of
Proverbs as "sentence literature" is overly simplistic).
The two types are: (1) Exhortations/admonitions (Mahnwort,
often found in Prov 1-9; 22:17-24:22; 31:1-9); and (2)
sentences or sayings (Aussage, found largely in Prov
10:1-22:16; 24:23-34; 25-29).1 The basic difference
between the two is that admonition (Mahnwort) utilizes an
imperative/jussive and a motive clause while the sentence
(Aussage) uses the indicative.
The Admonition (Mahnwort)
Let love and faithfulness never leave you;
bind them around your neck,
write them on the tablet of your heart
Then you will win favor and a good name
in the sight of God and man
(Prov 3:3-4).
The admonition is found both in Mesopotamia and in
Egypt. In Egypt, Ptahhotep's writing provides an
illustration of the imperatival sense of the admonition:
Know your helpers, then you prosper,
Don't be mean toward your friends,
They are one's watered field,
And greater than one's riches,
For what belongs to one belongs to another.2
The commands may come in various forms, such as: (1) one
positive; (2) one negative; (3) a positive and a negative;
____________________
1McKane, Proverbs, pp. 1-10. Cf. Crenshaw,
"Wisdom," pp. 230-32.
2Lichtheim, Ancient Egyptian Literature, 1:72.
and (4) a cluster of imperatives.1 An introductory
conditional clause is found in many of the Egytian
admonitions. This clause specifies the circumstances in
which the imperatives apply.2 Kayatz divides the Egyptian
admonitions into those which are "casuistically begun" and
those which are "imperativally begun." So Ptahhotep
advises:
If you are mighty, gain respect through knowledge
And through gentleness of speech.
Don't command except as is fitting,
He who provokes gets into trouble.3
Kayatz develops four types of motivational clauses
in Egyptian Instructions: (1) generalizing statements
(substantiate the imperative by providing the principle
that underlies it); (2) purpose clauses (show the
imperative as effective in accomplishing desired purposes);
(3) descriptions of character; and (4) reflections (induce
obedience by elliciting reflection).4 An example of a
generalizing admonition may be seen in Ptahhotep:
____________________
1Scott, The Way of Wisdom, p. 58. Joel T.
Williamson "The Form of Proverbs 1-9," p. 10 cites three
models of the admonition from Kayatz, McKane and Smith.
He gives a convenient listing of examples of each of these
in the Egyptian texts and follows Kayatz, Studien zu
Proverbien 1-9 (pp. 13-14).
2McKane, Proverbs, p. 76; and Kayatz, Studien zu
Proverbien 1-9, pp. 11, 32-36.
3Lichtheim, Ancient Egyptian Literature, 1:70.
4Kayatz, Studien zu Proverbien 1-9, p. 74.
Examples of each of these types are given in Williamson,
"The Form of Proverbs 1-9," pp. 16-23.
Let not thy heart be puffed up because of thy
knowledge;
be not confident because thou art a wise man.
Take counsel with the ignorant as well as the wise.
The (full) limits of skill cannot be attained,
and there is no skilled man equipped to his full
advantage.1
The predominance of the admonition form in the Egyptian
sources is demonstrated in "The Instruction of
'Onchsheshonqy" where there are 258 admonitions and 217
sayings.2
The admonition form is also extant in the Sumerian
and Akkadian sources (examples will be taken from
Suruppak, the "Counsels of Wisdom," and Ahiqar). For
example, the imperatival form appears in Suruppak, from
which Alster cites single and double imperatival forms.
The following Sumerian admonitions have an apodictic
character: "Do not buy an ass at the time of the harvest"
and "Do not steal, do not kill yourself."3 Conditional
statements are also coupled with the admonitions, like
they were in Egyptian literature. An example may be taken
from the "Counsels of Wisdom":
My son, if it be the wish of the prince that you are
his.
If you attach his closely guarded seal to your
person
Open his treasure house, enter within,
____________________
1ANET, p. 412.
2Gemser, "The Instructions of 'Onchshehonqy and
Biblical Wisdom Literature," in SAIW, p. 145.
3Alster, Studies in Sumerian Proverbs, pp. 40-42.
For apart from you there is no one else (who may do
this)
Unlimited wealth you will find inside,
But do no covet any of this,
Nor set your mind on double-dealing.
For afterwards the matter will be investigated.1
The motivational clause following an imperative may be
illustrated from Ahiqar vii.95-110:
[My s]on, ch[at]ter not overmuch so that thou speak
out [every w]ord [that] comes to thy mind; for men's
(eyes) and ears are everywhere (trained) u[pon] thy
mouth.2
The life setting of the admonition has been the
subject of much debate. Gerstenberger, connecting the
admonitions and the apodictic laws, suggests a family
setting for both, based on the negative form which is so
often used (Prohibitive form: lo' + Impf.; Vetitive form:
'al + Jussive).3 Richter, on the other hand, after
examining the prohibitive and vetitive forms, prefers a
upper class background in the schools.4 Whybray,
recognizing the presence of the admonition in Egyptian
instructions and the lack of the explicit use of hkm words,
____________________
1Lambert, BWL, p. 103.
2ANET, p. 428.
3Gerstenberger, Wesen und Herkunft des
'apodiktischen, pp. 60-65, 110-13. Cf. Nel, The Structure
and Ethos, p. 77.
4Richter, Recht und Ethos, p. 117. Khanjian,
"Wisdom in Ugarit," p. 19
also rejects Gerstenberger's suggestion.1 Nel properly
repudiates both restrictive settings as being based on the
form, rather than the content of the admonitions. He then
proceeds to trace the ethos of the family, school, court,
priests, and prophets in the text of Proverbs. He opts for
a "city" setting which allows for a multiplex origin.2 Any
isomorphic mapping of the form onto a setting which does
not take into account the complex character and content of
the wisdom sayings is misguided. Though Nel is undoubtedly
correct that the admonition form does not indicate its
setting and that the frequency of admonitions has its
highest concentrations in collections A and C, which are
clearly didactic, yet one wonders how closely one can link
ethos with setting, as it is obvious that a teacher may
discuss matters which have their loci outside of the
classroom. Solomon is surely not to be portrayed as a
provincial farmer because he discussed trees and
animals.3
____________________
1Whybray, The Intellectual Tradition in the Old
Testament, pp. 59, 114.
2Nel, The Structure and Ethos, pp. 82, 125. Nels
tracing of these themes in the text is a helpful synthesis.
Murphy also rejects the dual setting for the saying and
admonition, based on form alone, and maintains a didactic
setting for both (Wisdom Literature, pp. 6-7). Cf. also
Murphy, "Form Criticism and Wisdom Literature," pp. 480-81.
3Nel, The Structure and Ethos, p. 68. Glendon E.
Bryce, "Omen-Wisdom in Ancient Israel," JBL 94.1 (1975):36,
rejects Gerstenberger's conclusions. Zimmerli also notes
the great frequency of admonitions in chapters 1-9. While
chapters 10-22 contain 375 proverbs, only 10 are
admonitions and chapters 25-29 have 127 sayings, but only
The admonition has been grammatically defined, in
Nel's thorough study, as consisting "of an admonitory
element, in the grammatical form of an Imperative, Jussive,
Vetitive or Prohibitive and a motive element, which might
vary in grammatical form, length and explication."1 Other
peripheral features which appear in the instruction
sentences are conditional clauses, a call to attention, and
a summary instruction. These three are found in Egyptian
texts as well.2 Thus the admonition may be described as:
+ (call to attention) + (condition) + (imperative) +
(motivation) + (summary instruction). The two primitive
elements are the imperative and the motivation. It is
recognized that the motivational element is sometimes left
implicit.
The imperative element may express itself with four
basic verbal patterns: (1) imperative; (2) jussive;
(3) vetitive (negative of a jussive/imperative);3 and
(4) prohibitive (negative of the imperfect). Thus the
admonitions will break into positive and negative oriented
statements. Six basic types emerge from this
positive/negative orientation. First, there is the single
____________________
1Nel, The Structure and Ethos, pp. 74, 125.
2Williamson, "The Forms of Proverbs 1-9," pp.
35-39.
3Ronald J. Williams, Hebrew Syntax: An
Outline, p. 35, section 186.
positive command, which may be manifested either by an
imperative (Prov 4:23; 16:3; 22:6; 25:16, 17; 31:8-9) or,
much more rarely, by a jussive (Prov 1:23; 19:25a).
Second, the command may be expressed by a single negative
in vetitive form (Prov 3:11-12; 23:10-11; 22:22; 24:28;
25:8; 31:3) or--as it appears once--with the prohibitive
(Prov 20:19). Somewhat less frequently, command dyads
occur, manifesting a third form of two positive commands.
Three options occur at this point: (1) the imperative/
imperative (Prov 8:5-9; 9:5-6); (2) the jussive/imperative
(Prov 4:4) and imperative/jussive (Prov 23:26-28); and
(3) the jussive/jussive (Prov 4:25). A fourth category is
the dyading of a negative and a positive command (either as
a vetitive and an imperative [Prov 3:1-2, 21-24; 23:4-5] or
an imperative/vetitive sequence [Prov 1:8-9; 4:1-2, 5-6a;
8:33-36; 23:12-14; 24:11-12, 21-22]. Fifth, although rare,
there may be a double negative (vetitive/prohibitive, Prov
22:24-25). Lastly, there may be a cluster of three or four
command forms (Prov 3:5-6; 4:13, 14-19; 20-22; 6:20-23;
23:19-21, 22-25; 30:8-9).1 Nel notes the connection
between the negative command and the negative aspect of the
motivation which accompanies it (Prov 22:26-27; 22:22-23;
____________________
1This material was synthesized from a chart by Nel,
The Structure and Ethos, pp. 65-67. Cf. also Chisholm,
"Literary Genres and Structures in Proverbs," pp. 3-4 and
his listing on pages 14-23.
23:9, 20-21) and positive prescriptions bearing positive
type motivations (Prov 23:17-18; 3:11f; 8:33-34). He
cites only three exceptions (Prov 22:22-23; 23:10-11; and
24:11-12), all of which mention YHWH.1
The motive clause has been the object of much
study recently2 and is linked almost inseparably to the
command of the admonition in Proverbs. The motive clause
provides the rationale explaining why a certain injunction
should be carried out. It is of interest that the wise
man did not simply legislate that his students obey his
advice; nor did he always invoke Yahweh as the basis upon
which one was to respond, although that motif is included
at points (Prov 22:23; 23:11; 24:12, 18; 25:22). Most
often, the wise man appealed to "a sense of self-interest
and relied upon a capacity to reason things out."3 Quite
frequently the motivation is in reference to rewards and
punishments. This is not in terms of an eschatological,
divine judgment, but is, rather, in terms of the cause and
____________________
1 Nel, The Structure and Ethos, p. 87.
2Major works on the motive clause are: Nel, The
Structure and Ethos, pp. 18-65; H. J. Postel, "The Form and
Function of the Motive Clause in Proverbs 10-29" (Ph. D.
dissertation, University of Iowa, 1976), pp. 1-194; B.
Gemser, "The Importance of the Motive Clause in Old
Testament Law," VTSup 1 (1953):50-66; and R. N. Gordon,
"Motivation in Proverbs," Biblical Theology 25.3
(1975):49-56 (which has a helpful summary chart on page
56).
3Crenshaw, Old Testament Wisdom, p. 21; and von
Rad, Wisdom in Israel, pp. 90-91.
effect principles which operate presently in the created
order of the world (Prov 3:1, 2; 4:4; 6:25, 26; 14:7). So
Proverbs 29:17 advises:
Discipline your son and he will give you peace,
he will bring delight to your soul.
When one harmonizes his life with order, the results of
life, health, and prosperity follow. The individual who
violates order must bear the negative consequences
inherent in the deed.1 The temporal rewards and
punishment motif is also strongly manifested in Proverbs
outside of the confines of the motivational clauses as
well (Prov 1:18-19; 10:4, 6; 11:3-6, 8; 12:3, 6, 10-11,
13, 20; et al.).2
The bond between the admonition and motivation is
seen to be inseparable by Nel, who maintains that every
admonition has a motivation. The weakness of this
position is divulged in his discussion of Proverbs 31:8-9
and 27:2, where he states that the motivation is
"inherent."3 Zimmerli and Zeller more properly allow for
admonitions without motivations (Prov 24:27, 28, 29;
____________________
1Fox, "Aspects of the Religion of the Book of
Proverbs," HUCA 39 (1968):60.
2Gordon, "Motivation in Proverbs," p. 56. Gordon
discusses motivation in general and does not deal with the
motive clause specifically. Vid. Gladson, "Retributive
Paradoxes in Proverbs 10-29," for an interesting
development of this concept.
3Nel, The Structure and Ethos, pp. 64, 68.
31:8, 9).1
The previous notion that admonitions were
agglomerations of wisdom fragments built into larger and
larger units in a unilateral, evolutionary manner has been
proven to be incorrect by both the Egyptian and
Mesopotamian literature.2 Thus Nel, Kayatz, and Waltke
correctly reject Richter's and Gerstenberger's hypotheses
that the motivation clauses were later tagged onto the
admonitions in the postexilic period.3 One should note the
examples cited above from Sumerian and Old Kingdom Egyptian
literature which exhibit strong motivational elements as an
integral part of the admonition complex.
The introductory particles and forms of the
motivation are quite varied. Nel states:
The motivative clauses are usually introduced with ki
[Prov 24:1-2, 23:9, 6-8; 3:11-12; 4:13, 23; 7:24-27;
1:8-9], pen [Prov 25:8, 16, 17; 26:4, 5; 31:4-5;
5:7-14], waw [Prov 16:3; 29:17; 1:23; 3:5-6, 9-10,
21-24; 14:7], le...(+Inf. Cstr.) [Prov 5:1-2; 7:1-5],
gam [Prov 22:6], lema'an [Prov 19:20], ki-yes [Prov
19:18a], 'aser [Prov 22:28; 6:6-8], or with a secondary
____________________
1Walter Zimmerli, "Concerning the Structure of
Old Testament Wisdom," in SAIW, p. 183; and Dieter
Zeller, Die weisheitlichen Mahnspruche bei ben
Synoptikern, p. 22.
2McKane, Proverbs, pp. 6-7. McKane here
refutes J. Schmidt, Studien zur Stilistik.
3Nel, The Structure and Ethos, pp. 72, 142;
Waltke, "The Book of Proverbs and Ancient Wisdom
Literature," p. 228; and Kayatz, Studien zu Proverbien
1-9, pp. 36ff.
verbal clause in the form of a simile [Prov 5:18b-20;
23:4-5] popular proverb [Prov 20:19, 18; 17:14].1
Basically, there have been two ways of cataloging
the motive clauses. First, Nel organizes the motivations
on a functional, syntactic level (e.g., result clause [Prov
24:19-20, 21-22; 27:11]; causal clause [Prov 3:11-12;
22:22-23; 23:1-3; 24:1-2]; predication [Prov 4:14-19;
5:1-6; 6:6-8; 14:7; 23:26-28, 31-36]; interrogative [Prov
5:15-18a; 22:26-27; 24:28]; conditional [Prov 24:27];
secondary command [Prov 13:20a; 20:13b, 22]) and notes when
it is a final clause (Prov 16:3; 19:20; 22:10, 24-25; 25:8;
26:4, 5) or subordinate clause (Prov 19:25; 31:3, 6-7). He
also observes when the motivation precedes the imperative
form (Prov 20:19) and when it is left implicit (Prov
24:14).2 Second, others would categorize the motive
clauses more semantically (vid. Kayatz's four categories
listed above [p. 238]).3 Nel also proposes four semantic
bases for the motivation: (1) its reasonableness; (2) its
____________________
1Nel, The Structure and Ethos, p. 68; cf. also
Gemser, "The Importance of the Motive Clause in Old
Testament Law," p. 53; and Phyllis Trible, "Wisdom Builds a
Poem: The Architecture of Proverbs 1:20-33," JBL 94
(1975):512, 516.
2Nel, The Structure and Ethos, pp. vii, viii,
18-57.
3Kayatz, Studien zu Proverbien 1-9, p. 74; cf. also
Williamson, "The Forms of Proverbs 1-9," pp. 16-22; and
Chisholm, "Literary Genres and Structures in Proverbs," pp.
4-5. Gemser, having studied motivation clauses in the Law
and Prophets, states: "One can discern four or five kinds
of motivation: 1) the motive clauses of a simply
dissuasiveness (which forwards the end results of one's
Dostları ilə paylaş: |