Aa history Lovers 2010 moderators Nancy Olson and Glenn F. Chesnut page



Yüklə 25,47 Mb.
səhifə19/173
tarix18.06.2018
ölçüsü25,47 Mb.
#49655
1   ...   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   ...   173

lives.
There's something very Zen in such an admission, and that spiritual

equilibrium

is what many people in recovery are striving for. At the same time, as a

feminist, I just couldn't get comfortable with powerlessness and

"acceptance" as

the paths to happiness for women in the aggregate. When taken out of the

context


of the individual pursuit of sobriety, recovery ideas seemed profoundly

non-liberatory. This puzzled me: how and why did these ideas move from one

context to another, and what was it about that changed context that gave

them


such a different valence? To answer those questions, I decided to write the

book


that became The Language of the Heart. Fortunately, as I wrote I got the

opportunity to revise this fairly simple binary into a much more complex and

multi-faceted picture.
A close-up
I've got two of these. The first is on pages 16-17, where I talk about what

this


book is not. Unlike most of the writings on the topic, The Language of the

Heart


is neither "for" nor "against" recovery, and it's important that people know

that going in. Twelve-step groups like AA may work well for some people but

not

for others. The broader culture of recovery is in some ways insipid, banal,



and

politically reactionary, and in other ways profound, exciting, and

progressive.

Like any complex cultural phenomenon, recovery can't be easily boiled down

to a

"good" or a "bad" thing, and people who come to the book expecting such



blanket

praise or condemnation will be disappointed.


The second thing I hope a browsing reader would come across is the series of

images on pages 89-91. These show the iconic figure that people in AA refer

to

as "the man on the bed," the de-toxing drunkard being visited by sober AAs



and

encouraged to try their program of recovery. The first image is a staged

photograph that accompanied the 1941 Saturday Evening Post article that

first


brought AA national attention; the second is an illustration for an article

in

the AA magazine The Grapevine. That illustration was translated into stained



glass by AA members in Akron, Ohio in 2001, and the final image is of their

work, which hangs in the Akron AA archives.


This triptych of images is important to me for two reasons. The image of

"the


man on the bed" exemplifies both the vulnerability (represented by the man

on

the bed himself) and the mutuality (represented by the AAs who have come to



offer him help) that together form the heart of 12-Step recovery.

Mid-twentieth-century straight white masculinity did not value either of

those

traits particularly highly, and AA's most radical feature may be its



injunction

to its members (about 66% of whom are men) to give up the habits of

"domination

and dependence" that have shaped their lives and their drinking. The man on

the

bed is poised to renounce those habits or to slip back into them, and so his



image appears frequently in AA's material culture. on sobriety medallions,

bookmarks, murals, etc. That AAs continue to re-imagine the man on the bed

in

new media suggests that even as the organization has grown into a global



phenomenon of millions of members, its radical

potential -- the possibility that individual men might transform their lives

by embracing relationships of compassion, rather than competition -- remains

alive.
Second, these images testify to the enormous help I received from recovering

people while I was putting this book together. Few of my primary sources

reside


in standard repositories like libraries, museums, or

professionally-maintained

archives; instead, they came from private collections, offbeat literature

dealers, and the archives maintained by recovering people interested in

their

own history. Their generosity in sharing these materials with me has been



one of

the greatest rewards of my research, and it is emblematized in these photos.


Lastly
One of the things I've become most aware of while working on this book is

the


degree to which cultural critics inside and outside of the academy write

about


phenomena that reflect and reinforce their own tastes and worldviews.

There's a

lot of writing out there about addiction, because addiction, despite its

tragic


dimension, retains a sheen of cool. Drug and alcohol use and abuse are

dis-inhibiting; they de-stabilize social norms. Without too much effort, we

can

see them as heroic challenges to the staid routines of our uptight bourgeois



lives.
Recovery culture, by contrast, is really square, both as aesthetics and as

politics. One of the amateur authors I talk about drew inspiration from

Lawrence

Welk in many of his writings, for crying out loud -- and not in an ironic

way!

It's this squareness, I think, that has led critics to overlook the



complexity

of recovery -- its existence as a cultural formation with a genuine

intellectual

and social history that both reflects and helps to construct the larger

economic, political, and psychic realities around it.
Personally, I would rather listen to hip-hop than to Lawrence Welk, and

prefer


reading high modernism to the personal stories in the Big Book. But that

doesn't


mean that the culture of people whose tastes don't run to transgressive or

ironic texts is transparent or not worthy of scrutiny. Neither belletristic

nor

academic critics of the popular expend much energy on square cultures,



however,

except to occasionally talk about how awful they are. I wonder what other

cultural formations besides recovery scholars of popular culture have

simplified

or overlooked in recent years simply because they don't give us aesthetic or

intellectual pleasure.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6335. . . . . . . . . . . . The two alcoholic employees in To

Employers

From: Harriet Dodd . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/13/2010 11:37:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hello
We are studying the chapter in the Big Book called

To Employers at the moment.


Page 149 says "Today I own a little company.

There are two alcoholic employees, who produce

as much as five normal salesmen."
Do we know who these alcoholics were?
Many thanks,

Harriet


______________________________
From the moderator: it will be useful here to

go to the Message Board at


http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/messages
and do a search for all the messages using the

phrase "To Employers" (e.g. Message 5468) and

all the messages entitled "authorship of Chapter

10" (e.g. Messages 3280 and 3284).


The chapter To Employers begins on p. 136 with the statement that this

chapter


was written by "one member who has spent much of his life in big business."

It

is believed by most AA historians (although not one hundred percent of them)



that this was Hank Parkhurst. See Hank's story "The Unbeliever" in the first

edition of the Big Book.


If this was indeed Hank, then on p. 141 the company which the author of this

chapter said he was employed by was Standard Oil of New Jersey.


Then on p. 149, the passage you are asking about says: "Today I own a little

company," which would have to be a reference to the Honor Dealers Co., an

automobile polish distributorship.
The company started out as just Hank Parkhurst and Bill Wilson. They hired

Ruth


Hock, a nonalcoholic, as their secretary. She typed up the various versions

of

the Big Book manuscript, and became AA's first secretary. Later on they



hired

Jim Burwell, another alcoholic, making four of them in all -- three

alcoholics

and one nonalcoholic.


See Jim Burwell's Big Book story "The Vicious Cycle," 3rd edit. page 246,

"Bill


and Hank had just taken over a small automobile polish company," and 3rd

edit.


page 248, "peddling off my polish samples."
In the passage you are asking about, on pp. 149-150, Hank was probably

thinking


of himself as "the boss," so the "two alcoholic employees" he was referring

to

would have been Bill Wilson and Jim Burwell.


Glenn Chesnut (South Bend, Indiana)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6336. . . . . . . . . . . . Earliest prison/behind the walls

groups in Canada

From: Michael . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/15/2010 3:33:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
This is a question for those familiar with

Canadian AA History.


I believe the first prison group in Canada was

the Intramural Group at Dorchester Penitentiary

in New Brunswick, registered with GSO June 22,

1949. The Group is still active.


Does anyone know of an older group of this type

in Canada?


Thanks.
Michael
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6337. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: archival resources

From: Charlie C . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/15/2010 7:34:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
For some years I had, among other duties, that of being college archivist

where


I am a librarian, and I found Light Impressions an excellent source of

archival


quality supplies and information: http://www.lightimpressionsdirect.com/
Charlie C.

IM = route20guy


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6338. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Speaker tapes of Joe H., Santa

Monica CA

From: Roy Levin . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/15/2010 2:51:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
It's Joe Hawk, not Joe Hutch. The BigBookAwakening

website is run by my AA buddy Dan S. of Santa

Monica a former Joe H. sponsee, and indeed, he

does sell a set of CDs of Joe's salvation army

workshop back in 93. I have these CDs myself.

Joe is an excellent presenter of the BigBook

based step process.
________________________________
From: James Bliss

To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Fri, January 29, 2010 7:32:00 PM

Subject: Re: Speaker tapes of Joe H., Santa Monica CA


There is a set for sale at:
http://bigbookawakening.com/
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6339. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Banners -- and photos of Bill

and Bob


From: DudleyDobinson@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/11/2010 7:26:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Some countries should include the U.S.A.

I got sober in San Jose, Ca and the local

Alano Clubs had pictures of our founders on

the walls of meeting rooms. No further

comment needed!
Dudley - Birr, Ireland
- - - -
From: Jon Markle

(serenitylodge at mac.com)


Personally, I detested the change on chips/tokens when they went from the

triangle to a likeness of Bill & Bob (those metal/bronze tokens). I refuse

to

carry them. It smacks of idolatry worship that I can't abide.


I refuse to attend meetings where there are such depictions on the wall;

even


large framed pictures are disturbing to me.
I believe that any such representation on our literature, tokens, posters,

etc,


is simply wrong spirited. The fellowship is not Bill and/or Bob. Holding up

one person as "god" simply defeats the whole purpose of our principles.

Although I may refer to something one or the other has written, (such as the

Steps), that does not mean I worship or idolize them as being infallible or

god-like.
- - - -
Original message from

(nuevenueve at ymail.com)


In some Countries (mainly in those very

anthropologically linked to ancestral religious

and political leadership imagery), one finds

pictures of both Bill W. and Dr. Bob on the AA

meeting rooms' walls, or even their figurines

in carved wood.


Don't know what Bill & Bob would have thought

about this, but it just happens.


- - - -
From the moderator: compare Message 4497
"Saints With Glasses: Mexican Catholics in

Alcoholics Anonymous"


http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/4497
"I confess all my errors to the priest since it's

the most mortal sin to receive the Lord without

confessing all. Here too I have to confess all my

errors. Here they talk to us of good things.

When I came here and saw the pictures of the

founders, I thought, 'I've never seen a saint with

glasses before!'"
"His comments drew laughter from the audience.

Displaying the portraits of the founders above

the lectern echoed the placement of saints'

images in a Catholic church. For this man, his

A.A. colleagues were confessors and Bill W.

and Dr. Bob his saints."


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6340. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Banners with the steps,

traditions, and concepts

From: Arthur S . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/11/2010 1:47:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Jim,
Wall banners or placards were not distributed to groups by the NY Office

prior to the mid-1970s after Bill W had passed away. Individual groups may

have elected to do what they did on an individual basis.
A question posited at the 1974 conference was: "Could we have the Twelve

Steps and Twelve Traditions made up in a 2' x 4' or other size suitable for

hanging in meeting places?" The answer was "The matter will be discussed at

a meeting of AAWS." I believe they began production of them in 1975.


A question posited at the 1976 conference that: "There has been much

controversy over the alleged misuse of the word "suggested" in reference to

the Twelve Steps. Please give all examples of literature changes in wording

since the 1975 Conference-changes allegedly made only to insure uniformity

in reference to the Twelve Steps, "which are suggested as a program of

recovery." The answer was: "In the listing of the Twelve Steps, the word

"suggested" was removed from 14 pamphlets. In three pamphlets, it has not

been removed. For further information, contact the Conference secretary."


The 1976 Conference Committee on literature recommended that "Present

terminology used regarding the word "suggested" when referring to the Twelve

Steps is consistent with that employed in the Big Book, the "Twelve and

Twelve," and other A.A. literature and should remain as is."


Bill may have been opposed to injecting the word "suggested" into the title

of the Steps but he was not opposed to the notion of the Steps being viewed

as suggestions. In the 1953 final Conference report, Bill is quoted as

saying:: "Where variations of the Traditions are concerned, we've gone up

and down like a window shade. We even have a Tradition that guarantees the

right of any group to vary all of them, if they want to. Let's remember, we

are talking about suggested (underlined in the report for emphasis) steps

and traditions. And when we say each group is autonomous, that means that it

also has a right to be wrong."
Cheers
Arthur
- - - -
From: Baileygc23@aol.com (Baileygc23 at aol.com)
Bill W said and repeated:
There is no dogma.

The one theological proposition is a Power greater than oneself.

Even this concept is forced on no one.
Banners and slogans, plus people instructing others, are dogma.
- - - -
Original message no. 6330 from James Blair

(jblair at videotron.ca)
The first banners on roll up window shades were produced in the New York

area and they were titled "Twelve Suggested Steps." Also, cards and other

local literature was printed in this manner. This was probably in the

1945-46 period.


Bill was opposed to the title "Twelve Suggested Steps" and twice delegates

to the General Service Conference put forward conference actions to change

the title from Twelve Steps to Twelve Suggested Steps and their proposed

actions were rejected.


I had read a couple of letters in the early GV's on this subject and I

brought it up with Frank M.(archivist) on a trip to GSO and he explained it

to

me.
I have not been able to find any letters by Bill on the matter.


Jim
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6341. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Bridge of Reason

From: J. Lobdell . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/15/2010 9:55:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The Bridge of Reason occurs in [Moses] Maimonides, eight hundred (or so)

years


ago, and was picked up by Spengler in his magnum opus, The Decline of the

West,


greatly publicized in the 1930s. I'm not sure if "the Bridge of Reason leads

to

the Shore of Faith" is itself in Maimonides, but that's generally where the



Bridge has been deemed to lead. My guess is any Big Book use comes from

Maimonides through Spengler -- unless it's also in Lewis Browne, the one

Jewish

religious writer we know Bill read.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6342. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Bridge of Reason

From: corafinch . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/15/2010 9:13:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
It sounds something like what Charles Fillmore wrote in the "Manifestation"

chapter of Christian Healing. Referring to the gulf between spiritual

knowledge

and the material manifestation, he wrote, "The bridge needed is the

structure

which thought builds." Fillmore and his wife Myrtle founded Unity Church, a

Christian denomination within the New Thought movement which was such an

important influence on AA.


However, other writers in the New Thought tradition used similar analogies,

so

Fillmore is certainly not the only potential source. Thomas Troward, in the



Edinburgh lectures, spoke of the subconscious (which he considered to be

amenable to conscious suggestion) as the bridge between individual minds and

the

higher thought or divine mind. Troward capitalized many of these terms,



although

Fillmore tended to leave them in lower case.


- - - -
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com,

Ben Hammond wrote:

>

> I have been searching for the



> source of the phrase "Bridge of Reason"

> (with caps) from the Big Book, pp. 53 and 56.

>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6343. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Banners with the steps,

traditions, and concepts

From: James Blair . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/17/2010 6:54:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Arthur wrote

> Wall banners or placards were not distributed to groups by the NY Office

> prior to the mid-1970s after Bill W had passed away. Individual groups may

> have elected to do what they did on an individual basis.


These were made up by N.Y. Intergroup on blinds as well they printed cards

with Twelve Suggested Steps on them.


Too bad Frank M. is gone b/c he explained the whole kerfuffle to me.

Jim
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


++++Message 6344. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Banners with the steps,

traditions, and concepts

From: James Blair . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/17/2010 7:07:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
SUBTOPIC: the "suggested" twelve steps
Arthur wrote

> A question posited at the 1976 conference that: "There has been much

> controversy over the alleged misuse of the word "suggested" in reference

> to


> the Twelve Steps. Please give all examples of literature changes in

> wording

> since the 1975 Conference-changes allegedly made only to insure uniformity

> in reference to the Twelve Steps, "which are suggested as a program of

> recovery." The answer was: "In the listing of the Twelve Steps, the word

> "suggested" was removed from 14 pamphlets. In three pamphlets, it has not

> been removed. For further information, contact the Conference secretary."
I found a 1983 note under literature which states, ""The word "suggested" in

the title of the Twelve Steps not be reinstated."'


This suggests to me that it once existed in the literature. I have a friend

who attended the 83' conference and I'll see if I can get in touch with him

and ask if he can shine any light on this.
Jim
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6345. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Banners -- and photos of Bill

and Bob


From: Cindy Miller . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/17/2010 6:02:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From Cindy Miller, tomper, and Robert Stonebraker
- - - -
From: Cindy Miller

(cm53 at earthlink.net)


How about the big Bill & Bob pictures displayed

on an easel at the large Founder's Day meetings?


> `·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><((((º>
- - - -
From: "tomper87" (tomper99 at yahoo.com)
Very nice portraits of Dr. Silkworth, Dr. Bob, and Bill W. were displayed on

the


wall at the first A.A. club in New York. Bill lived upstairs for awhile so

apparently did not mind this.


Picture of this can be seen on the aa.org website on the timeline:

http://www.aa.org/aatimeline/ Just plug in search word clubhouse.


Portraits of someone can just be a sign of respect and do not necessarily

indicate idol worship of the individuals.


- - - -
From: Glenn Chesnut

(glennccc at sbcglobal.net)


This photo is in the 1935-1944 section of the AA timeline, describing events

which took place in 1940, and headed "The first New York clubhouse," with


Yüklə 25,47 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   ...   173




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə