Let us now compare the plebeian revolutionary, Muenzer, with the middle-class
reformist, Luther.
Thomas Muenzer was born in Stolberg, in the Harz, in 1498. It is said that his father
died on the scaffold, a victim of the wilfulness of the Count of Stolberg. In his fifteenth
year, Muenzer organised at the Halle school a secret union against the Archbishop of
Magdeburg and the Roman Church in general. His scholarly attainments in the theology of
his time brought him early the doctor’s degree and the position of chaplain in a Halle
nunnery. Here he began to treat the dogmas and rites of the church with the greatest
contempt. At mass he omitted the words of the transubstantiation, and ate, as Luther said,
the almighty gods unconsecrated. Mediaeval mystics, especially the chiliastic works of
Joachim of Calabria,
[14]
were the main subject of his studies. It seemed to Muenzer that the
millennium and the Day of Judgment over the degenerated church and the corrupted world,
as announced and pictured by that mystic, had come in the form of the Reformation and the
general restlessness of his time. He preached in his neighbourhood with great success. In
1520 he went to Zwickau as the first evangelist preacher. There he found one of those
dreamy chiliastic sects which continued their existence in many localities, hiding behind an
appearance of humility and detachment, the rankly growing opposition of the lower strata
of society against existing conditions, and with the growth of agitation, beginning to press
to the foreground more boldly and with more endurance. It was the sect of the Anabaptists
headed by Nicolas Storch.
[15]
The Anabaptists preached the approach of the Day of
The Peasant War in Germany
– 35 –
Judgment and of the millennium; they had “visions, convulsions, and the spirit of
prophecy.” They soon came into conflict with the council of Zwickau. Muenzer defended
them, though he had never joined them unconditionally, and had rather brought them under
his own influence. The council took decisive steps against them, they were compelled to
leave the city, and Muenzer departed with them. This was at the end of 1521.
He then went to Prague and, in order to gain ground, attempted to join the remnants of
the Hussite movement. His proclamations, however, made it necessary for him to flee
Bohemia also. In 1522, he became preacher at Allstedt in Thuringia. Here he started with
reforming the cult. Before even Luther dared to go so far, he entirely abolished the Latin
language, and ordered the entire Bible, not only the prescribed Sunday Gospels and
epistles, to be read to the people. At the same time, he organised propaganda in his locality.
People flocked to him from all directions, and soon Allstedt became the centre of the
popular anti-priest movement of entire Thuringia.
Muenzer at that time was still theologian before everything else. He directed his attacks
almost exclusively against the priests. He did not, however, preach quiet debate and
peaceful progress, as Luther had begun to do at that time, but he continued the early violent
preachments of Luther, appealing to the princes of Saxony and the people to rise in arms
against the Roman priests. “Is it not Christ who said: ‘I have come to bring, not peace, but
the sword’? What can you [the princes of Saxony] do with that sword? You can do only
one thing: If you wish to be the servants of God, you must drive out and destroy the evil
ones who stand in the way of the Gospel. Christ ordered very earnestly (Luke, 19, 27): ‘But
these mine enemies, that would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay
them before me.’ Do not resort to empty assertions that the power of God could do it
without aid of our sword, since then it would have to rust in its sheath. We must destroy
those who stand in the way of God’s revelation, we must do it mercilessly, as Hezekiah,
Cyrus, Josiah, Daniel and Elias destroyed the priests of Baal, else the Christian Church will
never come back to its origins. We must uproot the weeds in God’s vineyard at the time
when the crops are ripe. God said in the Fifth Book of Moses, 7, ‘Thou shalt not show
mercy unto the idolators, but ye shall break down their altars, dash in pieces their graven
images and burn them with fire that I shall not be wroth at you.’” But these appeals to the
princes were of no avail, whereas the revolutionary agitation among the people grew day
by day. Muenzer, whose ideas became more definitely shaped and more courageous, now
definitely relinquished the middle-class reformation, and at the same time appeared as a
direct political agitator.
His theologic-philosophic doctrine attacked all the main points not only of Catholicism
but of Christianity as such. Under the cloak of Christian forms, he preached a kind of
The Peasant War in Germany
– 36 –
pantheism, which curiously resembles the modern speculative mode of contemplation, and
at times even taught open atheism. He repudiated the assertion that the Bible was the only
infallible revelation. The only living revelation, he said, was reason, a revelation which
existed among all peoples at all times. To contrast the Bible with reason, he maintained,
was to kill the spirit by the latter, for the Holy Spirit of which the Bible spoke was not a
thing outside of us; the Holy Spirit was our reason. Faith, he said, was nothing else but
reason become alive in man, therefore, he said, pagans could also have faith. Through this
faith, through reason come to life, man became godlike and blessed, he said. Heaven was
to be sought in this life, not beyond, and it was, according to Muenzer, the task of the
believers to establish Heaven, the kingdom of God, here on earth. As there is no Heaven in
the beyond, so there is no Hell in the beyond, and no damnation, and there are no devils but
the evil desires and cravings of man. Christ, he said, was a man, as we are, a prophet and a
teacher, and his “Lord’s Supper” is nothing but a plain meal of commemoration wherein
bread and wine are being consumed with mystic additions.
Muenzer preached these doctrines mostly in a covert fashion, under the cloak of
Christian phraseology which the new philosophy was compelled to utilise for some time.
The fundamental heretic idea, however, is easily discernible in all his writings, and it is
obvious that the biblical cloak was for him of much less importance than it was for many a
disciple of Hegel in modern times. Still, there is a distance of three hundred years between
Muenzer and modern philosophy.
Muenzer’s political doctrine followed his revolutionary religious conceptions very
closely, and as his theology reached far beyond the current conceptions of his time, so his
political doctrine went beyond existing social and political conditions. As Muenzer’s
philosophy of religion touched upon atheism, so his political programme touched upon
communism, and there is more than one communist sect of modern times which, on the eve
of the February Revolution, did not possess a theoretical equipment as rich as that of
Muenzer of the Sixteenth Century. His programme, less a compilation of the demands of
the then existing plebeians than a genius’s anticipation of the conditions for the
emancipation of the proletarian element that had just begun to develop among the
plebeians, demanded the immediate establishment of the kingdom of God, of the
prophesied millennium on earth. This was to be accomplished by the return of the church
to its origins and the abolition of all institutions that were in conflict with what Muenzer
conceived as original Christianity, which, in fact, was the idea of a very modern church. By
the kingdom of God, Muenzer understood nothing else than a state of society without class
differences, without private property, and without superimposed state powers opposed to
the members of society. All existing authorities, as far as they did not submit and join the
The Peasant War in Germany
– 37 –
Dostları ilə paylaş: |