Aa history Lovers 2009 moderators Nancy Olson and Glenn F. Chesnut page



Yüklə 11,49 Mb.
səhifə24/74
tarix18.06.2018
ölçüsü11,49 Mb.
#49237
1   ...   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   ...   74

- - - -


Message #4756

Hi everyone,

Audrey Borden here with a response to LD

Pierce's post. Everything I learned about

Barry Leach is recorded in the book "The

History of Gay People in Alcoholics Anonymous:

From the Beginning."

A transcript of his wonderful talk at the

1985 Twin Cities Roundup, "The Gay Origins of

AA's Third Tradition," appears in Chapter 2.

Other topics include a comparison of treatments

for alcoholism and homosexuality, the debate

in AA over meetings for gay alcoholics, the

development of gay meetings, interviews with

pioneering lesbian and gay addiction pro-

fessionals, the history of AA's pamphlet AA

and the Gay/Lesbian Alcoholic, the story

of Alcoholics Together (a parallel AA

organization for gay alcoholics in southern

California from 1968-1982), and many stories

of recovery and wisdom from gay (and straight)

AA's with long-term sobriety.

Best, Audrey
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5664. . . . . . . . . . . . SV: Re: Father Ralph Pfau

From: Bent Christensen . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/29/2009 3:04:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Dear Glenn, dear group
Is there any facts or indications, why the New

York AA office turned down the offer from both

Ed Webster and Richmond Walker?
Best regards

Bent Christensen

Valmuevej 17

6000 Kolding

Tlf. 23 84 54 26

www.pass-it-on.dk

http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/StoreBog_studie/
Fra: Glenn Chesnut

Emne: [AAHistoryLovers] Re: Father Ralph Pfau

Til: "AAHistoryLovers group"

Dato: tirsdag 28. april 2009 23.21


Richmond Walker offered Twenty Four Hours a Day (the second best selling AA

book


of all time) to the New York AA people back in the 1950's and they turned

him


down. Ed Webster offered The Little Red Book to them, and they turned him

down


too.
The only books the New York AA office were publishing back then were books

written by Bill W.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5665. . . . . . . . . . . . Publishing the 24 Hour book

From: Bruce C. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/4/2009 12:20:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Why the 24 Hour book was not published by A.A.
Hi All
We have heard various reasons why A.A. never

published the 24 Hour a Day Book, that is

currently published by Hazelden but, here is

the real story. This is from the Final Report:

Fourth General Service Conference of A.A. 1954,

page 20:
"The Conference was asked to consider the offer

of the publisher who wished to give to A.A.

Publishing, Inc. publication rights to the

booklet, 'Twenty-Four Hours a Day.'
A two-page letter from the publisher, favoring

this proposal and answering certain objections

to the proposal, was read to the Conference.

The letter noted that current net profit from

sales of the booklet is about $5,300 annually.**

Requests that A.A. Publishing, Inc. undertake

publication of the booklet have been received

from many areas, largely as a result of

suggestions by the present publisher, it was

reported.


Comment by the Delegates indicated they felt

it unwise to set a precedent in the case of

this booklet and expressed fear that A.A.

Publishing 'would be flooded with similar

requests' if it did so. The Delegate from the

State in which the booklet is published said

it was the consensus of his group and of his

area that the proposal not be approved.


Following full discussion of the proposal,

the Conference adopted a resolution that

publication rights to 'Twenty-Four Hours a Day'

not be accepted and further asked that the

publisher be thanked for his offer."
Bruce C.
- - - -
**FROM THE MODERATOR:
Richmond Walker's papers, which are in one of

the Florida AA archives, show that Rich

took this profit every year and gave it to the

Daytona Beach AA group, which in turn sent the

entire sum to the New York office.
As long as Rich and the Daytona Beach AA

group were publishing the 24 Hour book (1948

to 1954), they never kept a penny of the

profits from its sale for themselves.


GFC
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5666. . . . . . . . . . . . Publishing the 24 Hour book and

Little Red Book

From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/4/2009 3:25:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Bent Christensen has asked, "Is there any facts or indications, why the New

York


AA office turned down the offer from both Ed Webster and Richmond Walker,"

to

let the New York office take over publishing their books?


- - - -
(1) We remember how Bill W. had encountered such enormous difficulties in

obtaining the money to publish the Big Book in 1939. In 1952 to 53, he met

even

more difficulties in obtaining the money to publish the Twelve Steps and



Twelve

Traditions. Finally, in desperation, he entered into a deal with Harper and

Brothers, a commercial publisher, where two editions would be published, one

for


AA members, and the other a commercial version (for fifty cents more per

copy).


By later standards, this would probably have been regarded as a breach of

the


Traditions, but it was the only way Bill could figure out to raise the money

to

print his new book. See Pass It On, pages 355-6.


On the other hand, the authors of the Twenty Four Hour book and the Little

Red


Book (together with the AA groups which had sponsored those two books, the

Daytona Beach group in Florida and the Nicollet Group in Minneapolis), had

apparently effortlessly been able to raise the money to publish those two

books


and keep them in print.
The New York office only had the money to publish and promote ONE BOOK at

that


time. Should the manuscript to Bill W's Twelve and Twelve be tossed back in

a

file cabinet, and never receive publication, so the New York office could



take

over publishing Twenty Four Hours a Day, or the Little Red Book?


There was a period, according to Ernest Kurtz, when more AA members had

their


own copy of the Twenty Four hour book than there were who had a copy of the

Big


Book. In my part of Indiana, it was the little black book that all the AA

people carried around with them all day long, not the Big Book. And the

Little

Red Book was a direct competitor to the Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions,



and

was not only selling extremely well, but was far easier for beginners to

read

and understand.


So both these books were already doing better than anything Bill W. had ever

written. They most certainly did NOT need New York's help.


Does anybody seriously think that the manuscript of the Twelve and Twelve

should


have been tossed in a file cabinet and not published, just to take over

publishing some other book that was already doing well?


(2) When Richmond Walker asked the New York office to take over publishing

Twenty Four Hours a Day in 1953, the response was an almost immediate "no."


See http://hindsfoot.org/RWfla3.html
Not only did they not have the money in New York to take over printing it,

they


did not yet, at that point in 1953, know for sure that the just-published 12

and


12 was going to be successful.
When Ed Webster and Barry Collins offered New York the Little Red Book, New

York's response, naturally enough, was identical. New York was putting all

of

its money into first the Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions (in 1953), next



the

second edition of the Big Book (in 1955), and finally Alcoholics Anonymous

Comes

of Age (in 1957).


(3) And Bent, there here arose an even more important question: Why SHOULD

the


New York AA office be turned into a huge publishing house, with all the

financial concerns and monetary investment which that would entail? The

response by the Delegates to Richmond Walker made it clear that they most

certainly did NOT see that as the proper role of the New York AA office:


"Comment by the Delegates indicated they felt it unwise to set a precedent

in

the case of this booklet and expressed fear that A.A. Publishing 'would be



flooded with similar requests' if it did so."
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5667. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Is the silkworth.net site down?

From: Jim M . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/5/2009 1:15:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Good day my AAHistoryLover friends!
The problem is the doctors wrote me out of

work for a year on two separate occasions. I

was unable to continue working after July 24th

2007 and am using Bender And Bender to obtain

Social Security.
So, although the activation fee to get the

http://silkworth.net/ site back online is

quite small, I nevertheless do not have it

at this point.


It is frustrating to say the least. I do hope

I am able to get it back online soon. Just

haven't figured out how yet.
Hope you are all doing well!
Yours in service,

Ever grateful,

Jim M.
silkworthdotnet@yahoo.com

(silkworthdotnet at yahoo.com)


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5668. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Publishing the 24 Hour book

From: momaria33772 . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/4/2009 5:51:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi All,
Thanks to Bruce for his reply which brings up

a related issue that I would like to address.

The original question and some of the responses

referred to the book being refused by the

"New York AA Office". There may be some who

do not understand that the decision was really

made by the representatives of all the groups

in the US and Canada. The "New York AA Office"

followed the decision made by these representa-

tives (Delegates).


There seems to be a feeling by some that GSO

runs things, often in opposition to the groups

and members. I think it is our responsibility

to make it clear that we are the them that

makes these decisions.
* * * *
I'd like to share one other thought I have had

every time anyone has brought up publishing of

any materials like these. Would the people who

love and use the 24 Hour book be prepared to

have it changed at some future Delegate

Conference based on some objection that

someone in my home group had and got submitted

to the Conference Agenda?


For those who don't believe that could happen,

I would point out that both the fourth edition

versions of the Foreward and Dr. Bob's Nightmare

have been changed based on submissions by

members and groups in the US and Canada. I

could easily see today's version of the 24 Hour

Book being radically different from the one

originally published.


Jim H.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5669. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Publishing the 24 Hour book

From: Archives Historie . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/5/2009 1:16:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From the Daytona Florida Archives,
The moderator GFC is absolutely right on

and correct. Not a penny was kept here in

Daytona and was all past on to GSO. We have

the papers to prove this fact also.


So when you visit Daytona please come in and

visit the archives display in our Intergroup

office where you mary see these papers and

much much more.


Thank you. David in Daytona
- - - -
Subject: Publishing the 24 Hour book

To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com

Date: Monday, May 4, 2009, 12:20 AM
FROM THE MODERATOR:
Richmond Walker's papers, which are in one of

the Florida AA archives, show that Rich

took this profit every year and gave it to the

Daytona Beach AA group, which in turn sent the

entire sum to the New York office.
As long as Rich and the Daytona Beach AA

group were publishing the 24 Hour book (1948

to 1954), they never kept a penny of the

profits from its sale for themselves.


GFC
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5670. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Publishing the 24 Hour book

From: Charlie Parker . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/6/2009 1:38:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
What were the changes to Dr Bob's Nightmare

and which foreword was changed??


Charlie Parker

Ace Golf Netting

828 Wagon Trail

Austin, TX 78758

Toll free 877-223-6387
-----Original Message-----

From: momaria33772

Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 4:51 PM
I'd like to share one other thought I have had

every time anyone has brought up publishing of

any materials like these. Would the people who

love and use the 24 Hour book be prepared to

have it changed at some future Delegate

Conference based on some objection that

someone in my home group had and got submitted

to the Conference Agenda?


For those who don't believe that could happen,

I would point out that both the fourth edition

versions of the Foreword and Dr. Bob's Nightmare

have been changed based on submissions by

members and groups in the US and Canada. I

could easily see today's version of the 24 Hour

Book being radically different from the one

originally published.


Jim H.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5671. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: the 24 Hour book and

spirituality vs. religion

From: Ben Humphreys . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/5/2009 7:27:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I always heard that the Conference turned it

down (the 24 Hour Book) on the grounds it was

too religious. Live and learn. Thanks for

your explanation. We all used it when I came

in and I still use it everyday.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5673. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: the 24 Hour book and

spirituality vs. religion

From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/6/2009 3:39:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Ben Humphreys (message 5671) said "I always

heard that the Conference turned it down

(the 24 Hour Book) on the grounds it was

too religious."


Yes, I have heard people say that too, but that

was not so. In fact, the reason why the 24 Hour

Book became so popular in AA so quickly,

was because it provided a replacement for a

book which some AA members DID regard

as "too religious," namely, The Upper Room.


From 1935 until the publication of the 24 Hour

Book in 1948, the main meditational book used

by AA people was this Southern Methodist

publication called The Upper Room.


And as noted, the reason why AA people all

over the US and Canada began using the 24 Hour

Book right away, was because they wanted a

meditational book that was not filled with so

much Christian religious phraseology.
To them, the 24 Hour Book seemed perfect as

a substitute for The Upper Room precisely

because IT WASN'T VERY RELIGIOUS in the

traditional Christian sense. No references

in the 24 Hour Book to Jesus or requirement of

belief in Christ, and hardly any scripture

quotations.
Richmond Walker, the AA member who wrote the

24 Hour Book, was sensitive to these issues.

His father, Joseph Walker, had been one of the

leading atheists in the United States (he wrote

a book defending atheism, and was one of the

signers of the original Humanist Manifesto).

Rich himself, his son told me, attended the

Unitarian Church:


http://www.uua.org/aboutus/index.shtml
"Unitarian Universalism is a liberal religion

with Jewish-Christian roots. It has no creed.

It affirms the worth of human beings, advocates

freedom of belief and the search for advancing

truth, and tries to provide a warm, open,

supportive community for people who believe

that ethical living is the supreme witness of

religion."


THE UPPER ROOM
http://hindsfoot.org/uprm1.html
"From 1935 to 1948, most A.A. members read

The Upper Room every morning for their morning

meditation. Although the Oxford Group had the

greatest influence on the development of early

A.A., this little paperback booklet may well

have been the second greatest influence on

early A.A. spirituality. This article gives

selections from the readings in some of the

issues of The Upper Room published in 1938 and

1939, along with commentary explaining some of

the ideas which A.A. drew from this source:

the understanding of character and character

defects, happiness as an inside job, the

Divine Light within, warnings against being

too imprisoned by doctrines, dogmas and church

creeds, the dangers of resentment, instructions

about how to pray, entering the Divine Silence,

learning to listen to God, opening the shutters

of my mind to let in the Sunlight of the Spirit,

taking life One Day at a Time, and above all,

remembering that God is present with me at all

times: 'Nearer is he than breathing, closer

than hands or feet.'"
See the Upper Room website at http://www.upperroom.org/
THE UPPER ROOM AND ROMAN CATHOLIC SPIRITUALITY
The Upper Room is not only read and used by

people from a number of different Protestant

denominations, but many Roman Catholic families

over the years have also kept copies of The

Upper Room in their homes for their own private

devotions.


In fact, the Southern Methodists have always

had strong links to the Roman Catholic tradition

as well as the Anglo-Catholic tradition. So

for example, as Fiona Dodd pointed out to me,

the Upper Room website currently includes

instructions on the spirituality of St. Ignatius

Loyola (1491-1556), who was the spiritual master

whom both Sister Ignatia and Father Ed Dowling

looked to as their great spiritual guide:
http://www.upperroom.org/methodx/thelife/prayermethods/
http://www.upperroom.org/methodx/thelife/prayermethods/ignatian.asp
http://www.upperroom.org/methodx/thelife/prayermethods/examen.asp
But this too is a very religious approach,

making heavy use of traditional Christian

language and imagery.
Richmond Walker's Twenty-Four Hours a Day

broke with that almost completely, and

devised language and imagery which could be

used by anyone who believed in a transcendent

Higher Power and the need to practice love,

unselfishness, honesty, and purity in our

daily lives.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5674. . . . . . . . . . . . Correspondence between Bill W. and

Fr. Pfau


From: nuevenueve@ymail.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/6/2009 2:28:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hello Group:
I was reading part of Fr. Ralph Pfau's "The

Golden book of Sanity" and remember Fr. Pfau

wrote something approximately like this:
>It is one of the AA glories that the individual

makes his election in subjects of AA without

waiting for the interference or criticizing

from the part of his companions<


referring to a letter to him from Bill W.
The question is, is there a website/book/other

in which one could find all the correspondence

between Bill W. and Fr. Ralph Pfau?
Thanks as always.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5675. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Correspondence between Bill W.

and Fr. Pfau

From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/6/2009 4:08:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
In Message 5674, asked

where we could find the correspondence between

Bill W. and Fr. Ralph Pfau.
I am glad you asked this question.
When Amy Filiatreau was the New York AA

Archivist, she very kindly located several of

Bill W.'s letters referring to Ralph Pfau,

letters referring to one particular question

I had asked her about. Bill was unhappy with

both Fr. Ralph and Lillian Roth because they

had broken their anonymity in print (Fr. Ralph

in his autobiography which he published in Look

magazine in 1958 and Lillian Roth in her

autobiography, I'll Cry Tomorrow, which came

out in 1954.
But I got the impression from Amy that there

were a whole lot more letters in which Bill W.

was either writing to Fr. Ralph or mentioning

his name in a letter to someone else.


Unfortunately, I have so far been unable to

find out whether anyone kept Fr. Ralph's papers

after his death. One of his nieces, who took

care of a lot of things after his death, told

me that she did not know where they had gone,

or even if anyone had kept them at all. The

Convent of the Good Shepherd in Indianapolis,

where he was the Confessor, is no longer in

existence, I have been told. If his papers

still exist any place, it is possible that

there might be copies of letters from him to

Bill W. there.


If anybody knows where Fr. Ralph's papers are

now, or if anybody would like to go through the

AA Archives in New York looking for references

to Fr. Ralph in Bill W.'s correspondence, it

would certainly be useful to AA historians.
REFERENCES:
See Father Ralph S. Pfau and Al Hirshberg, "A

Priest's Own Story," Look, Vol. 22, No. 5

(March 4, 1958): 84-97; and "Out of the Shadows,"

Look, Vol. 22, No. 6 (March 18, 1958): 85-98.


Lillian Roth, I'll Cry Tomorrow (New York:

Frederick Fell, 1954). Lillian first joined


Yüklə 11,49 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   ...   74




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə