MDA finance is finite
and projects have to compete
for limited resources. The organisation has not
announced the value of funds available under each
of the five schemes, instead stating that the size of
the cash pools would be ‘dynamic’.
National Level Support
Unlike nearly every other film aid scheme, the MDA
Grant Schemes do not just cover production but
also development (usually the riskiest area of any
creative enterprise) and marketing the finished
product. Unusually, they do not just cover film
and TV but also games, interactive digital content,
music and publishing. MDA pays anything between
S$5,000 and $S200,000 to help develop a project;
the agency will provide grant finance for up to 40%
of Singapore expenditure and provide a further
bonus of 10 per cent if the beneficiary company
starts production within the following 12 months.
Regional Support
Singapore is a unitary City State, and does not
have regions which are comparable with the other
countries studied.
Role of Broadcasters
Singapore’s broadcasters do not appear to play a
significant role in film production.
Key Conclusions
The new MDA scheme is less than one year old, and
has yet to announce any investments through the
new five-prong structure; given past criticism about
lack of oversight with its previous funding initiatives,
however, officials are likely to be cautious about
what they invest in. In spite of the circumstances
which led to its creation, the initiative to provide
seed funding for company development as opposed
to solely providing project finance appears to be a
laudable one, and fits many of the recommended
criteria for a scheme to develop sustainable
production companies.
Section 12.0
l
Appendices
Building sustainable film businesses:
the challenges for industry and government
47
Section 12.0
l
Appendices
12.6
Sweden
Summary
Country indicators:
OUTPUT
Production volume 2011 (€m)
23.7
Number of films 2011
21
Average budget 2011 (€m)
2.6
Domestic film share, 2011 (%)
19.8
Note: these production figures refer only to films with selective SFI
funding. It is estimated that this accounts for between half and
three-quarters of all Swedish films released.
Country Approach
The Swedish system is based on a long-standing
voluntary agreement by exhibitors, more recently
joined by broadcasters, to fund the Swedish Film
Institute (SFI), which provides a mixture of selective
funding and automatic box office rewards to
support the production of Swedish films. There is
no national scheme to develop production
companies, but regional agency Film i Väst plays
an important role both in production finance
and company support.
National Level Support
The SFI has been responsible for the support and
development of the national film industry and
culture since 1963. Its primary funding comes
from the Film Agreement, a voluntary contract
between the State, film exhibitors, broadcasters
and other industry stakeholders (i.e., producers
and distributors), which is renegotiated every few
years. The bedrock of the Film Agreement is a 10
per cent levy on cinema tickets, plus a fixed annual
contribution by broadcasters; in addition, the
government provides around 50 per cent of the
total. The Film Agreement typically provides the
SFI with a budget of around €40 million a year, of
which about €27.5 million is invested in production
via either selective or automatic schemes. The SFI
also receives a separate government grant to fund
cultural activities, such as festivals and archives,
worth around €13 million a year.
The SFI operates an automatic reward system based
on box office, called the PRS. Swedish films that pass
the box office threshold of SEK2.5 million (€275,000)
are eligible to receive a PRS payment of between 50-
100 per cent of their gross, up to a maximum of SEK9
million (€990,000) or 65 per cent of their Swedish
equity, whichever is lower. At current ticket prices,
this maximum payment is reached at about 160,000
admissions. Children’s films receive 100 per cent of
the box office, films with no advance funding from
SFI receive 75 per cent, and films with advance SFI
funding receive 50 per cent. The total annual budget
of PRS is capped at SEK75 million (€8.25 million).
In 2008/9, the SFI used an unspent surplus from its
PRS budget to launch an experimental ‘market’ fund,
which offered a semi-automatic advance for films
in pre-production, filming or not yet released, using
a points system based on the producer’s previous
track record of box office success. The fund backed
11 films, but is no longer open because the PRS
surplus has been used up.
From January 2013 the Swedish Film Institute
will have its budget raised by SEK30 million (€3.4
million) – half from the state – to reach a total of
SEK380 million (€43 million). Part of the extra money
is earmarked for television drama, children’s film and
shorts and documentaries, while for the first time
Swedish films aimed at DVD or digital distribution
were allowed public funding.
The SFI provides selective funding for production
in the form of soft loans, recouped from net
profits. These are awarded by the SFI board on the
recommendation of five film commissioners – two
for features, one for children’s films, one for shorts
and one for documentaries. Decisions are based on
a balance between artistic and commercial factors,
while the total level of selective funding varies
according to the SFI’s income from the cinema levy,
but is typically around €19 million a year, including
€13 million for features and €3.3 million for
children’s films.
Selective funding was awarded to 15 films in 2010,
down from 21 films in 2009, when the SFI funded a
larger number of low-budget budgets - the Institute
is now trying to concentrate its funding on a smaller
volume of higher quality projects. At the same time,
the number of Swedish films being made without
any SFI funding is growing; although precise long-
term figures are not available, out of 77 Swedish
films released from 2008-10, 17 had no advance
funding from the SFI.
Building sustainable film businesses:
the challenges for industry and government
48