Macro Economy
028
Apr. 2015
Anticipated reforms of new government
A favorable turn in India’s business cycle arrives
just in time, before the presentation of the first annual
budget on 28 February, by the new government. The
government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi,
was elected to office in May 2014 with a landmark
single party majority. This was the first such decisive
electoral outcome in the past three decades, leading
to expectations of wide ranging pro-growth economic
reforms. The average growth rate in the past 14 quar-
ters has been a tepid 5.5 percent compared to about 9
percent achieved in the previous three years. This drop
was mainly because of the collapse of private sector
investment spending. The investment slowdown was
aggravated due to infrastructure issues of electricity,
delays in regulatory clearances and approvals and
perhaps also policy gridlock. The last was particularly
evident in projects which
needed environmental con-
siderations to be balanced against growth imperatives.
The Modi led government is expected to cut through
many such Gordian knots, push economic legislation
and help rapid scaling up of investments. This has
been already anticipated by the stock market which
performed spectacularly in the past 12 months. Modi
has announced a goal of improving India’s rank in the
World Bank’s ranking of Ease of Doing Business, aim-
ing to be among the top 50 in the world. Furthermore,
increasing the share of manufacturing in GDP to 25
percent is key to future growth.
One of the biggest anticipated reforms is the rollout
of a nationwide goods and services tax (GST), which
will bring all Indian states into a common economic
market. This requires consensus of all the state govern-
ments in the federal setup and is slated to be flagged
off in 2016. GST holds the promise of raising GDP by
at least one percent on a sustained basis. It will also
reduce tax leakage, due to
interlocking incentives for
compliance. India has one of the lowest tax-to-GDP
ratios among its peers, so any measure that enhances
tax collection in a painless fashion is always welcome.
Investor sentiment is very positive as manifested by the
buoyant stock market, which has also benefited from
huge inflows from abroad. The government will also
undertake selective privatization, and use that money
to shore up physical and social infrastructure. There is
a publicly announced commitment to fiscal discipline,
with numerical targets for the deficit for the next three
years, which will keep the rating agencies at bay.
Demographic dividends
India’s demography is its big strength. It directly
translates into growing consumption demand, savings,
taxpayers and productive workers. Further, since the
average age of the workforce will remain young, the
economy can sustain a larger
deficit for a longer pe-
riod. So long as deficit spending is growth inducing—
meaning producing infrastructure and public goods—it
produces a virtuous cycle of growth, taxes and eventu-
ally lower deficit. If all the government’s initiatives on
large-scale skilling of the workforce, financial inclusion
of all households, and digital connectivity progress as
planned, we are likely to see a sustained growth phase
for India. Economic growth and consequent tax re-
sources are essential to meet the persisting challenges
of poverty, malnourishment, low human development
indices, especially in backward districts, and social
security. Additionally, a big challenge is to chart out
a growth path that will reduce the stress on the envi-
ronment, use resources like
water frugally and enrich
ecology.
Closer ties with the world
India’s engagement with the world is also deepen-
ing. It has more than a dozen free trade agreements
in the pipeline, and to be concluded soon. Its trade-
to-GDP ratio has gone up from 10 to 50 percent in
the past three decades. Its export of IT services will
triple in the next 10 years. India’s ‘Look East’ policy
has been upgraded to an ‘Act East’ policy. India is an
active participant in the ASEAN + 6 i.e. RCEP nego-
tiations.
The India-China trade relationship is one of the
most dynamic and fast-growing bilateral relationships
in the world. This is likely to be expanded to investment
flows as well. There is a large unexploited strategic
complementarity between the two countries, especially
when it comes to investible funds and profitable pro-
jects.
In conclusion, one can safely predict that the march
of the EMs will continue. The world’s
balance will tilt to
the east. India and China’s share in the global economy
will increasingly mirror their population share. And at
least in the near term, India will provide much of the
growth impetus in Asia.
The views expressed by the author in this article are personal.
WWW.BOAOREVIEW.COM
Jan. 2015
033
1126 IAB, Columbia University, 420 West 118th Street, New York, NY 10027 | www.capitalism.columbia.edu | 212-854-2060
THE CENTER ON
Capitalism
and Society
AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
M E M B E R S
Edmund Phelps,
Amar Bhidé
Patrick Bolton
Guillermo Calvo
Merritt Fox
Roman Frydman
Ronald Gilson
Bruce Greenwald
Glenn Hubbard
Richard Nelson
Janusz Ordover
Andrzej Rapaczynski
Richard Robb
Jeffrey Sachs
Saskia Sassen
Amartya Sen
Richard Sennett
Robert
Shiller
Joseph Stiglitz
Sidney Winter
F O R E I G N
M E M B E R S
Massamiliano Amarante
Philippe Aghion
Saifedean H. Ammous
Ping Chen
Howard Davies
Sheila Dow
Jean-Paul Fitoussi
Dominique Foray
Hian Teck Hoon
John Kay
Esa Saarinen
Juan V. Sola
Jianguo Wang
Gylfi Zoega
J U N I O R
F E L LO W
Raicho Bojilov
V I S I T I N G
S C H O L A R
Saifedean H. Ammous
A D V I S O R Y
B O A R D
Patricia Armendariz
Robert Z. Aliber
Sir Harold Evans
Chen Fashu
Francis Finlay
Robert E. Kiernan
Karlheinz Muhr
Robert Mundell
Alfredo F. Navarrete
Richard Robb
Leo M. Tilman
S I S T E R
I N S T I T U T I O N S
Tor Vergata Economics Foundation
Center
on Law and Economics,
University of Buenos Aires
New Huadu Economics and
Management Institute
The Center on Capitalism and Society brings together leading scholars in
economics, business, finance, and law to answer basic questions about the
capitalist economies of the modern era—their performance and workings.
How did the well-functioning ones get their dynamism, how did they promote
economic inclusion, how did the imperfect knowledge on which they operate
open them to booms as well as slumps, and how did they transform a
growing number of jobs into problem-solving activities that are fulfilling in
their own right? How did the malfunctioning ones lose their dynamism?
Until economics is grounded on the basic character of modern economies—
imperfect
knowledge, uncertainty, and new ideas for speculation and
innovation—it limits and distorts our view. Our goal is to evaluate capitalism
in a rational, enlightened fashion. With this perspective, the Center works to
identify economic policies, institutional changes and cultural attitudes to
generate greater economic dynamism and greater inclusion in the United
States and across the world.
“
It is time for economics to go beyond the mainstream
models of markets to a serious study of capitalism—its
dynamism and stability, its capacity to spark innovation
at the grassroots and promote flourishing of individuals
from all strata of society.
”
Edmund S. Phelps
2006 Nobel Laureate in Economics
Director, The Center on Capitalism and Society
Dean, New Huadu Business School
博鳌观察第十一期英文-三校.indd 33
2015.1.4 12:30:26 PM
P01-96-BAGC3-R5.indd 28
15-3-5 下午10:36