Final Assessment Questions on “Theoretical phonetics” Card-1 Connection of Phonetics with Other Sciences


Narrow and Broad Definitions of Intonation



Yüklə 111,88 Kb.
səhifə30/43
tarix30.01.2023
ölçüsü111,88 Kb.
#99765
1   ...   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   ...   43
Final Theoretical Phonetics

2.Narrow and Broad Definitions of Intonation.
Intonation is a complex unity of these prosodic features of speech: melody (pitch of the voice); sentence stress; temporal characteristics (duration, tempo, pausation); rhythm; timber (voice quality). The term "prosody" is widely used in linguistic literature alongside with the term "intonation" but in the broad sense. Intonation organizes a sentence, determines communicative types of sentences and clauses, divides sentences into intonation groups, gives prominence to words and phrases, expresses contrasts and attitudes. There are no sentences without a particular intonation and we cannot express any meanings without itю Intonation can be described on the acoustic level (in terms of its acoustic characteristics), on the perception level (in terms of the characteristics perceived by a human ear) and on the linguistic level (in terms of meanings expressed by intonation).Intonation on the perception level is defined as a complex, formed by significant variations of pitch, loudness and tempo (the rate of speech an pausation) closely related. Intonation on the perception level is defined as a complex, formed by significant variations of pitch, loudness and tempo (the rate of speech an pausation) closely related. There are definitions that also include timbre, which is sometimes regarded as the fourth component of intonation by some linguists (it shows the speaker‟s emotions, such as joy, sadness, irony, anger, indignation, etc.). In the British and American tradition intonation is restricted to the pitch (tone) changes only. Intonation is identified with pitch movements (melody), because pitch has the greatest linguistic value.


Card-26

  1. Syntagm theory .Baunduin de Cournetay applied the term “syntagm” for a word used in a sentence in contradistinction to a word taken as a lexical unit (“a lexeme”). Sausure used this term to mean two or more linguistic elements joined together: two successive morphemes or two elements of a compound word or a noun with an attribute.Scherba’s syntagm theory is based on the syntactic, semantic and phonetic relations of words in an utterance. Scherba defined the syntagm in the following way: “The phonetic entity, which expresses a semantic entity in the process of speaking (and thinking), and which may consist either of one rhythmical group or of a number of such groups is what I call a syntagm.” The term “syntagm” has a drawback: it suggests only syntactic relationship of a group of words. Moreover, the term “syntagm” is often used by many well-known linguists with two different meanings which have nothing to do with the prosodic unit under consideration. The term “sense-group” calls attention to the fact that it is a group of words that make sense when put together. But it doesn’t indicate its intonational character.The term “breath-group” emphasizes the physiological aspect of the syntagm, which is uttered with a single breath. A breath-group usually coincides with a syntagm because pauses for breath are normally made at points where pauses are necessary or possible from the point of view of meaning.But a pause for breath may be made after two or more syntagm are uttered, so a breath-group may not coincide with a syntagm.


  2. Yüklə 111,88 Kb.

    Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   ...   43




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə