Microsoft Word en кд 2017-220-06 (3) 21 04 2016

12

 

b)

 

the application was submitted only in electronic form to the Application registration portal 

of the Program or if the application was only received by the competition organizer in paper 

form before the deadline for submitting applications for the competition (see paragraph 11.1 

of the tender documentation).

 

11.4.

 

If an application submitted in electronic form to the Application registration portal of the 

Program does not contain copies of documents listed in paragraphs 9.1 – 9.14 of the tender 

documentation or if the application documents were formed not according to designated 

forms or if the documents lack necessary information requested in the forms or if the 

documents lack a signature of the leading scientist, authorised person and/or the 

organization’s seal (depending on the contents of the document) then such an application 

will be considered non-compliant with requirements set by the tender documentation.

 

 

 

12.

 

 Changing and withdrawal of an application for the competition

12.1.

 

Participants of the competition may change submitted applications for participation in the 

competition or to withdraw it in prescribed order at any time before the deadline for 

submitting applications for the competition (see paragraph 11.1 of the tender 

documentation).

 

12.2.

 

Changes to the application for participation in the competition should formed and submitted 

in accordance with requirements set in the tender documentation.

 

12.3.

 

When submitting changes to an application for participation in the competition in paper for 

to the address of the organizer of the competition in a sealed envelope, the participant of the 

competition should put the following remark on the envelope: «Changes to the application 

for participation in the competition for grants by the Government of the Russian Federation 

for state support of scientific research conducted under the direction of leading scientists in 

Russian educational institutions of higher education, scientific 

institutions 

subordinate to the 

Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations, and state scientific centers of the Russian 

Federation (stage VI)». 

12.4.

 

Written notification on withdrawal of an application for participation in the competition 

should be sent to the address of the organizer of the competition specifying the registration 

number of the application. The notification should be signed by the leading scientist and by 

an authorised representative of the educational institution or scientific institution and should 

be sealed by the educational or scientific institution. If the notification is signed by an 

authorised representative acting on the basis of a power of attorney, such power of attorney 

should be enclosed into the notification. If a notification of withdrawal of an application 

was submitted with violations of set requirements, the application is not considered 

withdrawn.

 

 

13.

 

Review of applications for the competition

13.1.

 

The competition commission reviews the submitted applications in terms of their 

conformance with the selection criteria (requirements) set in the tender documentation. The 

review should be finished within 20 workdays from the deadline for submitting applications 

for the competition (see paragraph 11.1 of the tender documentation).

 

13.2.

 

If necessary, within the period designated for reviewing the applications, the competition 

commission can request written clarification on data and documents submitted in an 

application from the applicant. This can be done to determine whether the provided 

documents conform with the selection criteria (requirements) set in the competition 

documentation.

 

If a participant of the competition does not provide necessary clarification, this participant’s 

application will be withdrawn from further participation in the competition by the 

competition commission.

 

13.3.

 

As a result of reviewing documents and information submitted as parts of applications for 

participation in the competition, the competition commission makes the decision whether:

 

---

13

а) 

a participant of the competition, his/her application and proposed scientific research comply 

with the selection criteria (requirements) and the application is granted access to the 

evaluation process within the designated procedure;

 

b)

a participant of the competition and/or his/her application and/or proposed scientific

research do not comply with the selection criteria (requirements) and the application is

withdrawn from further evaluation process.

13.4.

 

Results of evaluation of applications for participation in the competition are compiled into a 

protocol that is signed by all members of the competition commission who were involved in 

evaluation of applications.

 

Information concerning applications that are granted access to evaluation, as well as 

concerning applications that were rejected by the competition commission (specifying 

reasons of rejection) is published at the 

Designated website of the Program within two 

workdays after members of the competition commission sign the protocol of review of 

applications for  the competition. 

13.5.

 

If as a result of review of applications for participation in the competition the competition 

commission makes a decision to reject all the applications for participation in the 

competition, the competition is declared void.

 

Information about declaring the competition void is published at the 

Designated website of 

the Program within two workdays after the competition commission makes the decision to 

reject all the applications for participation in the competition and to declare the competition 

void

.

 

14.

Evaluation of applications for the competition

14.1.

 

Applications for participation in the competition that have not beet rejected by the 

competition commission as a result of reviewing process should be evaluated on the basis of 

criteria set by the tender documentation. The evaluation process is organized in two stages.

 

14.2.

 

At the first stage, the following scientometric indicators of the leading scientist are 

evaluated:

 

a)

for fields of studies falling within the following categories «Natural and exact sciences»,

«Technology», «Medical and Health Sciences», «Agricultural sciences»:

Criterion 

Points

8

 

H-index of the leading scientist (according to the Web of Science Core 

Collection database). 

0-30 

Number of publications (of type «article», «review») by the leading scientist 

in 2012-2017 in scientific issues indexed by the Web of Science Core 

Collection database. Scientific issues that published the leading scientist’s 

papers should be in the first quartile (Q1) by impact-factor JCR-2015 and 

listed by the Web of Science under a research topic corresponding or adjacent 

to the research topic of the application for the competition

9

. 

0-70 

b)

for fields of studies falling within the following categories «Social sciences», «Human

sciences»:

8 

 For the purposes of evaluation, all the applications for participation in the competition are grouped according 

to fields of studies. Maximum points in a group are awarded to the application for participation in the competition 

having the highest quantitative measure for the given criterion. Points of other applications in this group are calculated 

proportionally to the highest quantitative measure for the given criterion.

 

9 

 

Publications by the leading scientist that are listed in the personal profile of the ResearcherID information 

resource.

 

Criterion 

Points

8

 

---