Ministry of higher and secondary special education of the republic uzbekistan state world languages university

Questions for self-control: 
 
1.
How “culture” can be interpreted in anthropocentric paradigm? 
2.
How can you define the term “cultural concept”? 

---

195 
3.
What kind of characteristics of national colouring features of 
phraseological units can be compared in typology? 
4.
How can cultural world picture be classified? 
RecommendedLiteratures 
 
1.
Ma’rufovZ.M., O’zbektiliningizohlilug‘atiI-II, M., Russkiyyazik, 
1981, p. 63, 97, 110. 
2.
Weedon, Chris Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. 
Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 2nd edn. 1996. 
3.
Маслова В. А. М 31 Лингвокультурология: Учеб. пособие для 
студ. высш. учеб, заведений. -- М., «Академия», 2001, C. 35. 
4.
Матушка-Русь: Опыт гендерного анализа поисков национальной 
идентичности России в отечественной и западной историософии. М.: 
Ладомир, 2001. C. 25. 
5.
National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project. Standards 
for foreign language learning in the 21st century. Yonkers, NY: Author. 1999. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

---

196 
6.3.
 
Typology in Gender Linguistics of English and Native 
languages 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In linguistics, the new directions of anthropocentric paradigm have been 
developing in recent years and gender linguistics can be included in this 
development. It is known that the first researches on gender started to be 
investigated in western humanitarian sciences. The reason of appearing them was 
the new views of investigations of the problems of intelligence, philosophy of 
science and philosophy of society. “Gender” is considered the main object of 
genderology. It includes anational description of cultures, the roles of male and 
female in society and their relationship and behavior.
Post-structuralism has provided a major challenge to essentialist notions of 
gender and has been crucial in the developing understanding of gender.With its 
emphasis on the constitutive nature of discourse, it has thoroughly informed 
linguistic study – and indeed has been largely responsible for the “linguistic turn” 
in many other disciplines.Chris Weedon famously characterized language as ‘the 
place where actual and possible forms of social organization and their likely social 
and political consequences are defined and contested. Yet it is also the place where 
our sense of selves, our subjectivity is constructed’ [Weedon,1987, 21].