(Gehrig et al 1996, Jensen et al 1998), the Ascomycota
+ Basidiomycota (Helgason et al 2003) or their
relationships were unresolved (Bruns et al 1992,
Tanabe et al 2000). Phylogenetic relationships of
the Mucorales also were unresolved in a Bayesian
SSU+LSU two-locus phylogeny (Lutzoni et al 2004).
Similarly phylogenies inferred from amino acid
sequence data from one or two loci have failed to
resolve evolutionary relationships of the Mucorales
(Keeling et al 2000, Keeling 2003, Helgason et al
2003), except for a possible sister group relationship
with the Mortierellales (Tanabe et al 2004, Tanabe et
al 2005) or the Entomophthorales (Keeling 2003).
Sequences of the Endogonales however were
noticeably absent from all of the amino acid-based
phylogenies. Phylogeny reconstructions based on
b-tubulin weakly supported a Mucorales + Ento-
mophthorales sister group relationship but did not
include sequences of the Mortierellales (Keeling
2003).
The genera currently classified within the mono-
phyletic Mucorales (Lutzoni et al 2004) have been
classified in up to 16 families, based primarily on
differences in sexual and asexual reproductive mor-
phology (Benny et al 2001). However our study
supports the results of another based on three genes
that indicated large scale polyphyly at the family level
(O’Donnell et al 2001); in that study four of seven
F
IG
. 2.
Scanning electron micrographs of Zygomycetes illustrating morphological diversity of sexual and asexual
reproductive structures. A–E. Mucorales. Zygospores of A. Cokeromyces recurvatus, B. Cunninghamella homothallicus, C.
Radiomyces spectabilis and D. Absidia spinosa. E. Hesseltinella vesiculosa sporangia. F–G. Mortierellales. F. Mortierella
(Gamsiella) multidivaricata chlamydospore. G. Lobosporangium transversalis sporangia borne on arachnoid mycelium. H–J.
Zoopagales. H. Piptocephalis cormbifera immature sporangia. I. Syncephalis cornu sporophore bearing senescent sporangia with
uniseriate sporangiospores. J. Rhopalomyces elegans fertile vesicle with monosporous sporangia. K. Basidiobolus ranarum
monosporous sporangium. L. Dimargaritales. Dispira cornuta two-spored sporangia. M–O. Kickxellales. Monosporous
sporangia of M. Spiromyces minutus, N. Linderina pennispora and O. Kickxella alabastrina. Bars: A–F, I–O 5 10 mm; G, H 5
20 mm.
876
M
YCOLOGIA
families containing two or more genera were inferred
to be polyphyletic (i.e. Mucoraceae, Thamnidiaceae,
Chaetocladiaceae and Radiomycetaceae). Given that
these polyphyletic families comprise more than 80%
of the Mucorales, the recent proposal to place all
mucoralean families in synonymy with the Muco-
raceae, with the exception of the Umbelopsidaceae,
seems plausible (Benny 2005).
We anticipate that as whole genomes become
available these resources will help to accelerate
a broad array of basic studies such as elucidating the
evolution of sexual reproductive mode and phyloge-
netic species recognition (Taylor et al 2000) within
these ecologically diverse and economically important
fungi.
Mortierellales.—This order (F
IG
. 2F, G) comprises
approximately 10% of the known Zygomycota with
close to 100 recognized species (Hawksworth et al
1995) distributed among six genera (Benny 2005).
With the exception of Mortierella, at more than 90
species, the other genera are monotypic (Aquamor-
Aquamortierella, Lobosporangium and Gamsiella) or
bitypic (Dissophora and Modicella). Except for Aqua-
mortierella and Modicella, which are thought to be
saprobic but never have been cultured, all members
of this order are characterized by thin, delicate
arachnoid-like mycelium (F
IG
. 2G) and zonate colo-
nies that often produce a garlic-like odor in pure
culture. Asexual reproduction is by uni- or multi-
spored sporangia that either lack a columella or
possess a rudimentary one and often by the pro-
duction of chlamydospores (F
IG
. 2F). Sexual repro-
duction, where known, is by zygospores which are
formed between apposed suspensors (see F
IG
. 12.9e
in Taylor et al 2004).
Although Hesseltine and Ellis (1973) and Benjamin
(1979) retained the Mortierellaceae within the
Mucorales, the Mortierellales, exclusive of the Umbe-
lopsidaceae, was supported strongly as an indepen-
dent evolutionary lineage in the combined rDNA
phylogeny (F
IG
. 1). Likewise phylogenies inferred
from amino acid and nucleotide sequence data
(Gehrig et al 1996, Helgason et al 2003, Lutzoni et
al 2004, Tanabe et al 2004) supported a monophyletic
Mortierellales; however it has been resolved either as
part of a paraphyletic zygomycotan grade (Seif et al
2005) or sister of the Endogonales (Gehrig et al 1996)
or Mucorales (Tanabe et al 2004). In addition
a preliminary two-locus phylogenetic analysis of
complete SSU and partial LSU sequence data
(O’Donnell unpubl) suggests that Mortierella might
be paraphyletic with respect to Dissophora, Lobospor-
angium and Gamsiella (Benny and Blackwell 2004), so
generic relationships deserve further study. Expanded
taxon sampling is needed before a robust hypothesis
of the evolutionary relationships within the Mortier-
ellales can be formulated.
Taxa formerly recognized as subgenus Micromucor
or the Mortierella isabellina-group of Mortierella
(Gams 1977) were excluded from Mortierellales and
strongly supported (F
IG
. 1) as monophyletic Umbe-
lopsidaceae (Meyer and Gams 2003). This position, as
early diverging members of a monophyletic Muco-
rales, has been noted elsewhere (F
IG
. 3; O’Donnell et
al 2001, Lutzoni et al 2004).
Endogonales.—Symbiotic association of mycorrhizal
fungi with plant roots is recognized as economically
and ecologically important (Taylor et al 2004,
Redecker and Rabb this issue). With the elevation of
the Glomales to the Glomeromycota (Schu
¨ ßler et al
2001) the only known member of the Zygomycota
sensu stricto that forms such symbioses are the
facultatively saprotrophic Endogonales. Formerly
treated as a family in the Mucorales (Hesseltine and
Ellis 1973), Benjamin (1979) validated Moreau’s
(1953) Endogonales by elevating the family to ordinal
status. Morton and Benny (1990) subsequently
emended the Endogonales to include only the
Endogonaceae and Endogone and moved the other
genera to a new order, the Glomales (Morton and
Benny 1990). The Glomales and Endogonales are
distinguished easily in that they produce intracellular,
arbuscule-forming endomycorrhizae (AM) and ecto-
mycorrhizae, respectively (Morton and Benny 1990,
Benny et al 2001). Another hallmark of the Endogo-
nales is that some species produce hypogeous fruiting
structures called sporocarps that contain zygospores
with apposed suspensors (see F
IG
. 15 in Benny et al
2001).
The Endogonales, sometimes called pea-truffles
because some species of Endogone produce macro-
scopic sporocarps that are pea-like in appearance
(Yao et al 1996), now includes four genera (Benny et
al 2001, Kirk et al 2001). Phylogenetic studies based
on SSU rDNA sequence analysis have indicated
a possible sister group relationship with the Mortier-
ellales (Gehrig et al 1996). However in the present
study the Endogonales and Mucorales formed
a strongly supported clade that is sister of the
Ascomycota + Basidiomycota + Glomeromycota clade
(F
IG
. 1). A sister group relationship of the Endogo-
nales and Mucorales is supported by morphological
evidence because they both form zygospores, in
contrast to the Glomeromycota in which zygospores
never have been observed (Sanders 1999). Lastly, the
novel Endogonales + Mucorales clade has been
recovered also from multilocus analyses that included
protein coding sequences ( James et al 2006a).
W
HITE ET AL
: P
HYLOGENY OF THE
Z
YGOMYCOTA
877