and for a suitable payment.
The Eighth Article. –
In the eighth place, we are greatly burdened by holdings which
cannot support the rent exacted from them. The peasants suffer loss in this way and are
ruined, and we ask that the lords may appoint persons of honour to inspect these holdings,
and fix a rent in accordance with justice, so that the peasants shall not work for nothing,
since the labourer is worthy of his hire.
The Ninth Article. – In the ninth place, we are burdened with a great evil in the constant
making of new laws. We are not judged according to the offense, but sometimes with great
ill will, and sometimes much too leniently. In our opinion
we should be judged according
to the old written law so that the case shall be decided according to its merits, and not with
partiality.
The Tenth Article. – In the tenth place, we are aggrieved by the appropriation by
individuals of meadows and fields which at one time belonged to a community. These we
will take again into our own hands. It may, however, happen that the land was rightfully
purchased. When, however, the land has unfortunately been
purchased in this way, some
brotherly arrangement should be made according to circumstances.
The Eleventh Article. – In the eleventh place we will entirely abolish the due called
Todfall
(that is, heriot) and will no longer endure it, nor allow widows and orphans to be thus
shamefully robbed against God’s will, and in violation of justice and right, as has been
done in many places, and by those who should shield and protect them. These have
disgraced and despoiled us, and although they had little authority they assumed it. God will
suffer this no more, but it
shall be wholly done away with, and for the future no man shall
be bound to give little or much.
Conclusion. – In the twelfth place it is our conclusion and final resolution, that if any one
or more of the articles here set forth should not be in agreement with the word of God, as
we think they are, such article we will willingly recede from when it is proved really to be
against the word of God by a clear explanation of the Scripture. Or if articles should now
be conceded to us that are hereafter discovered to be unjust, from that hour they shall be
dead and null and without force. Likewise, if more complaints
should be discovered which
are based upon truth and the Scriptures and relate to offenses against God and our
neighbour, we have determined to reserve the right to present these also, and to exercise
ourselves in all Christian teaching. For this we shall pray God, since He can grant these,
and He alone. The peace of Christ abide with us all.
The Peasant War in Germany
– 94 –
Four hundred years have passed since the great Peasant War in Germany. It differs from
similar peasant uprisings of the Fourteenth Century in Italy, France and England, in that
these uprisings were of a more or less local character and were
directed against the money
economy then in the process of development, while the Peasant War, unfolding in the
epoch of early capitalism which was creating a world market, was intimately related to the
events of the Reformation. This more complex historic background, compared with the
background of the Fourteenth Century, rendered more complex the class grouping whose
struggle determined the whole course of the Peasant War. The role of proletarian elements
also becomes more pronounced compared with earlier uprisings.
It
was natural that, with the growth of a democratic movement in Germany, especially
after the July Revolution in France, attention should be directed towards the study of the
great Peasant War. A series of popular brochures and works examining individual phases of
the movement made their appearance, and in 1841 there was published the monumental
work of [Wilhelm] Zimmermann, which, to the present time, remains the most detailed
narrative of the events of the Peasant War in Germany.
It was also natural
that the German communists, confronted with the necessity of
determining how far the peasantry could be relied upon as a revolutionary factor, should
have carefully studied the history of the Peasant War. Their attention was particularly
drawn to the leaders of the Peasant War, one of whom was Thomas Muenzer. It is
characteristic that as early as 1845, Engels, in one of his first articles for the Chartist
“Northern Star,” called the attention of the English workers to this “famous leader of the
Peasant War of 1525,” who, according to Engels, was a real democrat,
and fought for real
demands, not illusions.
Marx and Engels, who very soberly regarded the role of the peasantry in the realization
of a
social revolution never underestimated its role as a revolutionary factor in the struggle
against the large landowners and the feudal masters. They understood very well that the
more the peasantry falls under the leadership of revolutionary classes which unite it, the
more capable it is of general political actions. Led by the revolutionary proletariat,
supporting its struggle against capitalism in the city and the village, the peasantry appeared
to be a very important ally. This is why Marx and Engels, during the revolution of 1848–
49, mercilessly exposed the cowardly conduct of the German bourgeoisie, which, currying
favour with the Junkers
and afraid of the proletariat, had refused to defend the interests of
the peasantry.
It was with the aim of instructing the German bourgeois democracy that in 1850,
The Peasant War in Germany
– 95 –