Aa history Lovers 2010 moderators Nancy Olson and Glenn F. Chesnut page



Yüklə 25,47 Mb.
səhifə36/173
tarix18.06.2018
ölçüsü25,47 Mb.
#49655
1   ...   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   ...   173
sion so great, that we felt his only hope would be through

what we then called "moral psychology", and we doubted

if even that would have any effect.


However, he did become "sold" on the ideas contained

in this book. He has not had a drink for a great many years.

I see him now and then and he is as fine a specimen of

manhood as one could wish to meet.


I earnestly advise every alcoholic to read this book

through, and though perhaps he came to scoff, he may re-

main to pray.>>
IT APPEARS TO ME as though "moral psychology" meant

the AA program of recovery as it existed c. October 1935,

which would mean something like the kind of roughly

devised six step program which Bill W., Earl Treat, and

Ebby described: http://hindsfoot.org/steps6.html
Looking at the way Dr. Silkworth spoke of it, this

"moral psychology" seems to have involved helping

people learn how to better apply good moral

principles to their lives, and it also seems to

have involved helping them learn how to pray and

turn to a higher power for help.


It was very different from Freudian psychiatry,

which had no room for God or morality in most

people's sense of that word. And even Jung taught

no strongly moral message in the sense in which

Bill Wilson and the early AA's understood moral

behavior.


Dr. Silkworth had the vision of a kind of

psychology which was very different from any of

the various kinds of psychology and psychiatry

which were dominating the western world during the

1930's. But let us remember that the word

"psychotherapy" meant (in the original Greek)

"psyches therapeia," the "healing of the soul,"

or in Latin the "cura animarum."


How could you truly heal a sick soul, without

putting it back on a good moral path, and

restoring its relationship with God? Dr. Silkworth

was a very wise and insightful man, it strikes me,

who was willing to buck the secularizing and

atheistic tendencies of his times.


Glenn Chesnut (South Bend, Indiana, US)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6517. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Why was Fitz''s alcoholic

problem so complex?

From: John Barton . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/10/2010 10:47:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
With respect to the additional info provided Fitz was second behind Hank to

surrender and recover. William Ruddell didn't meet Bill or get sober until

February of 1937. This is verified in Ruddell's first edition story as well

as

Lois's diary.


God Bless
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6518. . . . . . . . . . . . Historical definition of substantial

unanimity

From: Lonnie . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/10/2010 11:10:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I'm looking for the historical definition of "substantial unanimity" as used

in

the pamphlet "The AA Group... Where It All Begins" at the bottom of page 26.


Our group is struggling with an issue that has split the group at a 50/50

vote,


and the question has been posed as to how we will define "substantial

unanimity".


Any thoughts / help appreciated!
Lonnie V.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6519. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Historical definition of

substantial unanimity

From: Sober186@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/10/2010 9:31:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Bill W. used the term in an article in the October 1946, and defined it at

that time as a two thirds vote. The same idea is contained in the

pamphlet, "The AA Group ... Where It All Begins" (p. 34-35): If one is in a

hurry, skip to the last sentence.


"The group conscience is the collective conscience of the group membership

and thus represents substantial unanimity on an issue before definitive

action is taken. This is achieved by the group members through the sharing

of

full information, individual points of view, and the practice of AA



principles. To be fully informed requires a willingness to listen to

minority


opinions with an open mind.
"On sensitive issues, the group works slowly -- discouraging formal motions

until a clear sense of its collective view emerges. Placing principles

before personalities, the membership is wary of dominant opinions. Its voice

is heard when a well-informed group arrives at a decision. The result rests

on more than a 'yes' or 'no' count -- precisely because it is the spiritual

expression of the group conscience. The term 'informed group conscience'

implies that pertinent information has been studied and all views have been

heard before the group votes."


Within The e-AA Group, "substantial unanimity" means a 2/3 majority

whenever possible.


Jim L

Central Ohio


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6520. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Judge sentences man to get AA

sponsor


From: John Moore . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/11/2010 6:13:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From John Moore, Jim in Central Ohio, Rotax Steve, and Elisabeth
- - - -
From: John Moore

(contact.johnmoore at gmail.com)


Yes, courts have been sending drunks, and others, to AA for as long as I

have been sober. Getting a sponsor is a requirement of many facilities and

it is no surprise that the courts do to sometimes.
The first I heard of it was in 1972 in my home group and outrage prevailed

because you cannot force someone to come to AA, or to get a sponsor...it is

supposed to be voluntary. That view turned out to be short sighted because

alkies were coming and getting sober and doing well in spite of all

predictions to the contrary.
Last couple years I had a commitment on Wed nites at a halfway house and

there was a stack of court papers and resident papers to be signed each

week. Not unusual to sign 20 or 30 of them at a meeting. Some told me that

they had to find a sponsor to satisfy the terms of their release or their

residency in treatment. It is not easy because many AAs felt they were

being used by the system, and one man told me he refuses to sponsor anyone

who is in treatment, detox or under court orders.
Personally I don't care. I had great men get drunk under my sponsorship,

and had total losers become fine men in spite of how they arrived. If a man

is willing, I try to help if I possibly can.
John M

South Burlington, Vermont


- - - -
From: Sober186@aol.com (Sober186 at aol.com)
Not exactly the same sentence, but one local judge says he never sentences

a person to attend AA. He gives them an option of either going to jail for

x number of days or attending a few AA meetings a week for the same

length of time. He says they seem to always like the AA option. He also says

he makes it clear if he catches them skipping the AA meetings, they will

serve the full jail time. Very few skip the meetings.


We also had a Juvenile court judge in a small town sentencing youngsters

to attend AA meetings. Sometimes they were a little disruptive. A few

members of AA made an appointment with the judge and explained the concept

of

Open and Closed meetings. He then only sentenced them to Open AA meetings.


AA membership does not require having a sponsor, but that makes no

difference. A judge can do anything the judge wishes until he gets over

ruled

by a higher court. (Of course he may not get re elected)


Jim in Central Ohio
- - - -
From: "Rotax Steve"

(gallery5 at mindspring.com)


I see it at every meeting I go to. Recently my home group has been flooded

with


court cards.
I have often wondered how and when the courts started sending people to AA?
I try to be involved more with CPCPI and it bugs me when people are

"sentenced

to AA". I try to tell judges that AA is not punishment and that those who

are


sent there by the courts consider it so.
I would say that perhaps 1 in 15 do stay after there court card requirements

are


finished (but usually not for very long) so that is good but what's not good

are


the other 14 who can be disruptive and use the group for therapy which

waters


down the whole meeting. Long standing members try to steer topics toward the

program for discussion but it's difficult.


~ Rotax Steve
- - - -
From: "Elisabeth"

(elisabeth98043 at yahoo.com)


No! It's amazing that he didn't order him to do a 5th step ... excuse the

sarcasm ...


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6521. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Judge sentences man to get AA

sponsor


From: Rick Benchoff . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/11/2010 5:07:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From Rick Benchoff, LD Pierce, and Jim S.
- - - -
From: Rick Benchoff

(rxichard2nd at yahoo.com)


Greetings to my fellow AA History Lovers:
A.A. has a long history of cooperation with the professional community,

especially local judiciary. In meetings I often hear this modification to

our

Third Tradition that often "the desire to stop drinking may belong to the



judge!"
It is well known that various U.S. courts have ruled that people cannot be

ordered to attend A.A. meetings

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2007/09/07/0615474.pdf

but I can readily attest that in Maryland district and circuit judges

as well as the state Motor Vehicle Administration still routinely

order offenders to attend A.A. meetings.


Back in the 1980's the Maryland court systems in conjunction with the

Division


of Parole and Probation developed the Drinking Driver Monitor Program

(DDMP).


Prior to start of the DDMP courts were sending offenders to mandatory AA

meetings, but nothing on the scale that was seen after the start of the

DDMP.

Within a few years the number of court-ordered DWI offenders was enormous.



To

make a long story short, the service structure of our area (Area 29) decided

(after much debate, see this link:

http://www.intoaction.org/files/general12step/courtslips.pdf

to issue a "Call for Unity" and respectfully ask that groups in

Maryland no longer sign DDMP attendance slips. Most groups

voluntarily agreed to stop signing slips. The problems associated

with the influx of "slip signees" decreased dramatically.


Today judges and the MVA continue to send DWI offenders to AA, but usually

the


offenders sent are repeat offenders (and usually have been diagnosed by a

treatment professional as having an alcohol use disorder), rather than

first-time offenders. Most DDMP monitors no longer require that an

attendance

slip be signed by an AA member, but that the attendee must record

information

about the meeting, such as the date, time, location and name of the meeting,

meeting topic, name of the meeting leader or secretary, and the name of the

last

person to speak. This eliminates the need to have a slip signed (and makes



it

difficult for the attendee to falsify).


I first came into AA in 1987 in the midst of the court signing debate

carrying a

court slip. I encountered much hostility at the time, but eventually the

judge's desire for me to attend A.A. meetings developed into my own. There's

another saying that I often hear in meetings, "I first came to meetings

because


I had to, then I came because I wanted to, finally I came because it's

Tuesday


night and it's 8 o'clock."
The General Service Office has a number of pdf's available online about this

very topic:


http://www.aa.org/en_pdfs/smf-177_en.pdf
http://www.aa.org/en_pdfs/mg-05_coopwithcourt.pdf
In this posting I haven't mentioned the controversy of treatment centers

sending


people that self-identify as drug addicts. I'll skip that hot topic

entirely.


With warm regards,
Rick B.

Hagerstown, Maryland


- - - -
From: "diazeztone"

(eztone at hotmail.com)


My main point in posting this was that I have always seen people sentence to

AA.


I was one of them. My AA history website is dedicated to the Judge who

sentenced

me!!
However this is the first case I have heard of (in my 15 years sober)

of the court requiring a documented must get "An AA Sponsor"


I give my own opinion on this in a page on the aabibliography web site:
http://www.aabibliography.com/aa_paper_signers_probation_parole_alcoholics_a

nony\
mous.html [14]


LD Pierce

www.aabibliography.com


- - - -
From: "planternva2000"

(planternva2000 at yahoo.com)


So?
For years the local treatment facilities have been requiring inmates to get

a

'temporary' sponsor and home group. Some get sober, some don't.



I think one of our traditions says something about it not being AA's

business


what outside enterprises do.
Jim S.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6522. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Judge sentences man to get AA

sponsor


From: Craig Keith . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/13/2010 6:53:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
As I recall, it was the latter part of 1934 when

a judge in effect sentenced one Ebby T. to attend

Oxford group meetings.
That's the first "court ordered" person I've heard

about.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


++++Message 6523. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Historical definition of

substantial unanimity

From: Tom Hickcox . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/11/2010 4:52:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From Tommy H. and kevinr1211
- - - -
From: Tom Hickcox

(cometkazie1 at cox.net)


In the current pamphlet, the material quoted below

(less the last sentence which does not have quotation

marks) is on pp. 26-27. That "'substantial

unanimity' means a 2/3 majority whenever possible"

is not attributed.
Tommy H in Baton Rouge
- - - -
At 00:31 5/11/2010, Sober186@aol.com wrote:
>Bill W. used the term in an article in the October 1946, and defined it at

>that time as a two thirds vote. The same idea is contained in the

>pamphlet, "The AA Group ... Where It All Begins" (p. 34-35): If

>one is in a

>hurry, skip to the last sentence.

>

>"The group conscience is the collective conscience of the group membership



>and thus represents substantial unanimity on an issue before definitive

>action is taken. This is achieved by the group members through the

>sharing of

>full information, individual points of view, and the practice of AA

>principles. To be fully informed requires a willingness to listen

>to minority

>opinions with an open mind.

>

>"On sensitive issues, the group works slowly -- discouraging formal motions



> until a clear sense of its collective view emerges. Placing principles

>before personalities, the membership is wary of dominant opinions. Its

voice

>is heard when a well-informed group arrives at a decision. The result rests



>on more than a 'yes' or 'no' count -- precisely because it is the spiritual

>expression of the group conscience. The term 'informed group conscience'

>implies that pertinent information has been studied and all views have been

>heard before the group votes."

>

>Within The e-AA Group, "substantial unanimity" means a 2/3 majority



>whenever possible.
- - - -
From: "kevinr1211"

(analystkmr at hotmail.com)


In our basic text, chapter 2, a statement is made that defines AA's

unanimity,

its the famous line beginning with "We have a way out on which we can

absolutely

agree..."
In my experience, when it is hard to get a group to agree on an issue beyond

our


basic tenets of our basic purpose of staying sober,several principles

outside


unanimity can be used, especially when there is a stated divide, as you

describe. I question the very premise of your question: should you be even

using

the "substantial unanimity" principle when the opposite seems to be the



case?

Not everything in life is resolved. -k.


In the original question, "Lonnie" wrote:

<vote, and the question has been posed as to how we will define "substantial

unanimity.">>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6524. . . . . . . . . . . . The Pause Prayer

From: intuited . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/12/2010 2:57:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi All, I am particularly curious about the

"Pause Prayer" (Big Book pp. 87–88):


"As we go through the day we pause, when agitated

or doubtful, and ask for the right thought or

action. We constantly remind ourselves we are

no longer running the show, humbly saying to

ourselves many times each day "Thy will be done."

We are then in much less danger of excitement,

fear, anger, worry, self-pity, or foolish

decisions. We become much more efficient. We do

not tire so easily, for we are not burning up

energy foolishly as we did when we were trying

to arrange life to suit ourselves."
This reference to present moment guidance is

somewhat different than the emphasis on

anticipating the day (future) or reviewing

the day (past).


I would love to know what the history of this

emphasis was and are there any particular stories

about this present moment focus?
Thanks, Amelia B
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6525. . . . . . . . . . . . Awfully tough Irishman

From: Tom Hickcox . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/12/2010 5:41:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
We had our monthly Tradition meeting today.
I thought I had noted who the "awfully tough Irishman" mentioned in

the chapter on the 5th Tradition, but I hadn't.


I searched A.A.H.L.'s archive and the question is asked but not answered.
Who was he?
Tommy H in Baton Rouge
- - - -
FROM THE CHAPTER IN THE 12+12 ON THE FIFTH TRADITION:
[From the moderator: and please note that the main

point in this section is that the "primary purpose"

which AA must uphold with a total "singleness of

purpose" is TO TALK ABOUT RECOVERING FROM ALCOHOLISM,

NOT to talk to people about RELIGION.
Conservative Protestant evangelicals are NOT to

start preaching to Roman Catholics that they must

have a revivalist style born again experience where

they take Jesus as their personal savior, and vice

versa, Roman Catholics are NOT to start preaching to

Protestants that they have to follow Roman Catholic

dogmas about the Trinity and the Blessed Virgin Mary,

and BOTH groups are NOT to start preaching

Christianity at all to Jews, Buddhists, Hindus,

Muslims, etc.


Read what follows, and you will see that this is so.]
- - - -
"Each group has but one primary purpose - to carry its message to the

alcoholic

who still suffers."
"Restless one day, I felt I'd better do some Twelfth Step work. Maybe I

should take out some insurance against a slip. But first I'd have to find a

drunk to work on.

"So I hopped the subway to Towns Hospital, where I asked Dr. Silkworth if he

had a prospect. `Nothing too promising,' the little doc said. `There's just

one chap on the third floor who might be a possibility. But he's an awfully

tough Irishman. I never saw a man so obstinate. He shouts that if his

partner


would treat him better, and his wife would leave him alone, he'd soon solve

his


alcohol problem. He's had a bad case of D.T.'s, he's pretty foggy, and he's

very suspicious of everybody. Doesn't sound too good, does it? But working

with him may do something for you, so why don't you have a go at it?'

"I was soon sitting beside a big hulk of a man. Decidedly unfriendly, he

stared at me out of eyes which were slits in his red and swollen face. I had

to agree with the doctor - he certainly didn't look god. But I told him my

own

story. I explained what a wonderful Fellowship we had, how well we



understood

each other. I bore down hard on the hopelessness of the drunk's dilemma. I

insisted that few drunks could ever get well on their own steam, but that in

our groups we could do together what we could not do separately. He

interrupted to scoff at this and asserted he'd fix his wife, his partner,

and


his alcoholism by himself. Sarcastically he asked, `How much does your

scheme


cost?'

"I was thankful I could tell him, `Nothing at all.'

"His next question: `What are you getting out of it?'

"Of course, my answer was `My own sobriety and a mighty happy life.'

"Still dubious, he demanded, `Do you really mean the only reason you are

here


is to try and help me and to help yourself?'

"`Yes,' I said. `That's absolutely all there is to it. There's no angle.'

"Then, hesitantly, I ventured to talk about the spiritual side of our

program.


What a freeze that drunk gave me! I'd no sooner got the word `spiritual' out

of my mouth than he pounced. `Oh!' he said. `Now I get it! You're

proselytizing for some damn religious sect or other. Where do you get that

"no


angle" stuff? I belong to a great church that means everything to me. You've

got a nerve to come in here talking religion!"

"Thank heaven I came up with the right answer for that one. It was based

foursquare on the single purpose of A.A. `You have faith,' I said. `Perhaps

far deeper faith than mine. No doubt you're better taught in religious

matters


than I. So I can't tell you anything about religion. I don't even want to

try. I'll bet, too, that you could give me a letter-perfect definition of

humility. But from what you've told me about yourself and your problems and

how you propose to lock them, I think I know what's wrong.'

"`Okay,' he said. `Give me the business.'

"`Well,' I said, `I think you're just a conceited Irishman who thinks he can

run the whole show.'

"This really rocked him. But as he calmed down, he began to listen while I

tried to show him that humility was the main key to sobriety. Finally, he

saw


that I wasn't attempting to change his religious views, that I wanted him to

find the grace in his own religion that would aid his recovery. From there

on

we got along fine.



"Now," concludes the oldtimer, "suppose I'd been obliged to talk to this man

on religious grounds? Suppose my answer had to be that A.A. needed a lot of

money; that A.A. went in for education, hospital, and rehabilitation?

Suppose


I'd suggested that I'd take a hand in his domestic and business affairs?

Where


would we have wound up? No place, of course."

Years later, this tough Irish customer liked to say, "my sponsor sold me one

idea, and that was sobriety. At the time, I couldn't have bought anything

else."
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


++++Message 6526. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: The Irishman in the chapter on

Tradition Five in the 12 and 12

From: Dov . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/13/2010 4:12:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
According to Fr Ed Dowling quoted in p.47 of "Not God" Morgan R(yan) was

fresh


out of Greystone asylum which does not fit the 12&12 Tradition Five

description

of the Irishman in Towns Hospital. (Note that Fr Dowling is quoted as saying

that Morgan R was the only Roman Catholic in New York not the only Roman

Catholic in AA).
I was wondering whether another early Irish AA, Tom M. was a candidate. "Old

Tom" is described (in AA Comes of Age) as the brusque Irish janitor of the

AA

clubhouse who announced Father Ed as 'some bum from St. Louis'. That would



seem

at first sight to match the tough Irishman description in the 12 and 12.

However

he was brought into AA by Bill & Lois from Rockland State asylum, which



would

rule him out too.


However I do not know of any need to believe that the incident took place in

early AA because according to an article by Leonard Blumberg, (Professor of

Sociology, Temple University, Philadelphia Vol. 38. No. 11, 1977, "The

Ideology


of a Therapeutic Social Movement: Alcoholics Anonymous") Dr. Silkworth

continued

to work at Towns until his death in 1951

(http://www.silkworth.net/silkworth/silkworth_bio.html).


By 1951 there may well have been more than one tough Irishman in AA which

could


make it very difficult to identify the individual mentioned in Tradition

Five.
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, Tom V wrote:

>

> If the story goes back to the very early AA



> period, Morgan Ryan, who was the only Roman

> Catholic AA member at the time the Big Book

> was published, had an obviously Irish last

> name.


>

> - - - -

>

> From: kodom2545



>

> Do we know who the Irishman is in the chapter

> on Tradition Five in the Twelve Steps and

> Twelve Traditions, pp. 151-154?

>

> It was a man in Towns Hospital whom Dr.



> Silkworth indicated as someone who might be

> a possible candidate for the A.A. program.

>

> God Bless,



>

> Kyle


>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6527. . . . . . . . . . . . Sylvia K''s Doctor

From: mfmargetis . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/12/2010 9:49:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi All,
I searched but could not seem to find the answer to this question,

forgive me if I didn't look hard enough. In Sylvia K's story "The Keys

To The Kingdom" do we know who the Doctor in Evanston is?
Thanks,
-Mike Margetis
Brunswick, MD
- - - -
For short biographies of the authors of the

stories in the Big Book see:


http://www.a-1associates.com/westbalto/HISTORY_PAGE/Authors.htm
http://silkworth.net/aabiography/storyauthors.html
The following account is given there:
According to member list index cards kept by the Chicago group, Sylvia's

date of


sobriety was September 13, 1939. Because of slips by Marty Mann ("Women

Suffer


Too,") Sylvia may have been the first woman to achieve long term sobriety

....
She moved to Chicago thinking a new environment would help. She tried all

sorts

of things to control her drinking: the beer diet, the wine diet, timing,



measuring, and spacing of drinks. Nothing worked.
The next three years saw her in sanitariums, once in a ten-day coma from

which


she very nearly died. She wanted to die, but had lost the courage to try.
For about one year prior to this time there was one doctor who did not give

up

on her. He tried everything he could think of, including having her go to



mass

every morning at six a.m., and performing the most menial labor for his

charity

patients. This doctor apparently had the intuitive knowledge that



spirituality

and helping others might be the answer.


In the 1939 this doctor heard of the book Alcoholics Anonymous and wrote to

New


York for a copy. After reading it he tucked it under his arm and called on

Sylvia. That visit marked the turning point of her life.


Then he told her of the handful of people in Akron and New York who seemed

to

have worked out a technique for arresting their alcoholism. He asked her to



read

the book and to talk with a man who experiencing success by using this plan.

This was Earl Treat ("He Sold Himself Short"), the "Mr. T." to whom she

refers


on page 309.
Earl suggested she visit Akron .... Sylvia stayed two weeks with the Snyders

(Clarence Snyder, "The Home Brewmeister) in Cleveland. She met Dr. Bob, who

brought other A.A. men to meet her ....
She went back to Chicago where she eventually got sober. She worked closely

with


Earl Treat, and her personal secretary, Grace Cultice, became the first

secretary at the Intergroup office in Chicago, the first in the country.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6528. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: The AA version of moral

psychology

From: corafinch . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/17/2010 9:51:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
This phrase may be creating confusion because readers tend to assume that

Silkworth was referring to some type of therapeutic modality. By "moral

psychology," did he actually mean a type of clinical or counseling

psychology in

which the concept of morals was prominent, or did he mean something outside

of

the therapeutic realm?


In the 19th century, "moral psychology" was a branch of ethics. Ethics had

originally been strictly theological, then philosophical. Then a more

naturalistic approach evolved, including attention to human decision-making,

emotion, motivation and character development. I believe this was the sense

in

which Silkworth used the term. Yes, he was writing in the 20th century and



by

that time things had changed somewhat, due to the influence of William James

and

William MacDougal. But even at the time he was writing, no branch of



clinical or

medical psychology, as far as I can tell, was using the term "moral

psychology"

to describe itself. Silkworth was probably going back to the traditional use

of

the phrase as a psychologically-informed approach to conduct.


Silkworth may have been thinking of the Emmanuel Movement or its spin-offs,

of

the social-psychology approach then used by Dr. Riggs in Stockbridge, or of



the

various work-cure places where the wealthy could go to chop wood and do

other

menial labor. Or maybe he was thinking of the Keeley-cure alumni



associations

where people who dried out at Keeley clinics got together to strengthen one

another's resolve. There were also the religiously-based missions such as

Calvary, and of course the Oxford Group. None of these specifically said

they

were based on "moral psychology," however.


I certainly don't read him as saying that other doctors did not feel this

way.


In fact, he is saying the opposite: that medical people have always known

that


people acquire the motivation and strength to stop drinking for complex

reasons


not within the doctor's control. We would now put those reasons and that

process


in the general realm of "spirituality," but I don't think that word was in

Silkworth's vocabulary at the time.


Doctors, like most people, were inclined to become moralistic about alcohol

over-consumption, but of course they had to be on guard not to communicate

this

explicitly to the patient. It just wasn't, and isn't, part of the role,



rarely

does any good, and may do harm. I don't think Silkworth was saying anything

more

complicated than that. Certainly not that there were doctors (Freudian or



otherwise) who didn't believe morals had anything to do with solving

drinking


problems.
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, "martinholmes76@..."

wrote:

>

> What was their version of moral psychology mentioned in the Big Book in



the

Doctor's opinion?

>

> - - - -



>

> From Glenn C., the moderator

>

> (BB 4th ed. p. xxvii) Dr. Silkworth had been unable to



> devise a method of "moral psychology" which would help

> alcoholics, until Bill Wilson came to him as a patient, and

> devised a program of recovery which Dr. Silkworth

> allowed him to try out on other patients, a program

> involving a kind of "moral psychology" which repeatedly

> brought long term sobriety to apparently hopeless cases:

>

> <

> of moral psychology was of urgent importance to alcoholics,

> but its application presented difficulties beyond our concep-

> tion. What with our ultra-modern standards, our scientific

> approach to everything, we are perhaps not well equipped

> to apply the powers of good that lie outside our synthetic

> knowledge.

>

>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


++++Message 6529. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Sylvia K''s Doctor

From: Michael . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/17/2010 9:56:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From Mike M., tcumming, and Don B.
- - - -
From: "Michael"

(mfmargetis at yahoo.com)


Thank you "tcumming" for answering the question.
"page 22 pf AA COMES OF AGE identifies Sylvia's doctor as a DR BROWN"
Next question: What do we know about Dr. Brown? With everything he was

trying to do to help Sylvia he seemed incredibly enlightened and open

minded.
Thanks,
-Mike Margetis
- - - -
From Don B., Chicago historian and archivist
Her doctor was Dr. Seth Brown from Evanston, which was where Earl Treat

lived


..... and Earl contacted Dr. Brown, Sylvia came through Akron before

returning

to Chicao ... but she got drunk on the train home ...... but stayed sober

everafter ...... D.O.S. 9/13/39


- - - -
For Don's HISTORY OF CHICAGO AA, see:

http://hindsfoot.org/chicago1.pdf

listed on http://hindsfoot.org/archive2.html
- - - -
>

> Hi All,

>

> I searched but could not seem to find the answer to this question,



> forgive me if I didn't look hard enough. In Sylvia K's story "The Keys

> To The Kingdom" do we know who the Doctor in Evanston is?

>

> Thanks,



>

> -Mike Margetis

>

> Brunswick, MD



>

> - - - -

>

> For short biographies of the authors of the



> stories in the Big Book see:

>

> http://www.a-1associates.com/westbalto/HISTORY_PAGE/Authors.htm



>

> http://silkworth.net/aabiography/storyauthors.html

>

> The following account is given there:



>

> According to member list index cards kept by the Chicago group,

Sylvia's date of sobriety was September 13, 1939. Because of slips by

Marty Mann ("Women Suffer Too,") Sylvia may have been the first woman to

achieve long term sobriety ....

>

> She moved to Chicago thinking a new environment would help. She tried



all sorts of things to control her drinking: the beer diet, the wine

diet, timing, measuring, and spacing of drinks. Nothing worked.

>

> The next three years saw her in sanitariums, once in a ten-day coma



from which she very nearly died. She wanted to die, but had lost the

courage to try.

>

> For about one year prior to this time there was one doctor who did not



give up on her. He tried everything he could think of, including having

her go to mass every morning at six a.m., and performing the most menial

labor for his charity patients. This doctor apparently had the intuitive

knowledge that spirituality and helping others might be the answer.

>

> In the 1939 this doctor heard of the book Alcoholics Anonymous and



wrote to New York for a copy. After reading it he tucked it under his

arm and called on Sylvia. That visit marked the turning point of her

life.

>

> Then he told her of the handful of people in Akron and New York who



seemed to have worked out a technique for arresting their alcoholism. He

asked her to read the book and to talk with a man who experiencing

success by using this plan. This was Earl Treat ("He Sold Himself

Short"), the "Mr. T." to whom she refers on page 309.

>

> Earl suggested she visit Akron .... Sylvia stayed two weeks with the



Snyders (Clarence Snyder, "The Home Brewmeister) in Cleveland. She met

Dr. Bob, who brought other A.A. men to meet her ....

>

> She went back to Chicago where she eventually got sober. She worked



closely with Earl Treat, and her personal secretary, Grace Cultice,

became the first secretary at the Intergroup office in Chicago, the

first in the country.

>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6530. . . . . . . . . . . . Dave B.''s uncle in New Hampshire

From: M.J. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/16/2010 12:15:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I've read the information that has been published both on

silkworth.netand in the archives on Dave B.'s story, "Gratitude in

Action" (p. 193, 4th edition of the Big Book).
http://silkworth.net/aabiography/4thed/DaveB.html
On page 195, Dave B. describes driving a 1931 Ford from Cape Cod up to

Canada. On the way, "we stopped at my uncle's place in New Hampshire".


Does anyone know anything about Dave's uncle? His name, or where in New

Hampshire he may have lived?


In gratitude,
- M.J.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6531. . . . . . . . . . . . Akron honors Dr. Bob by re-naming

part of Olive Street

From: momaria33772 . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/20/2010 8:49:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Dr. Bob's Way coming to Akron

Portion of Olive St. will be designated for AA co-founder


By Stephanie Warsmith
Beacon Journal staff writer
Published on Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Each year, thousands travel to Akron to recognize Dr. Bob Smith for

co-founding

Alcoholics Anonymous.

This year, Akron will thank Dr. Bob in a special way — by naming part of a

street after him.

Akron City Council on Monday voted to designate the section of Olive Street

from

North Main Street to North Howard Street



''Dr. Bob's Way.'' This section of Olive is on the north end of St. Thomas

Hospital, which featured the first hospital specialty

unit to treat alcoholism as a medical condition. The street designation will

help celebrate the 75th anniversary of AA


starting in Akron on June 10.

''I think it's a good piece of legislation and a good way to honor Dr.

Bob,''

said Councilman Jeff Fusco. Summit County



Councilwoman Ilene Shapiro urged Please see Dr. Bob, council members to

redesignate the street and create a historical

marker. ''I think it's a lovely tribute to his memory,'' she said.
The city didn't want to rename Olive because of the inconvenience this would

cause to St. Thomas staff who have

documents printed with the current street name, said Deputy Mayor Dave

Lieberth. Signs with the new designation will be

added on Olive at Main, Howard and Schiller Avenue after a ceremony June 14

at

St. Thomas.


Stephanie Warsmith can be reached at 330-996-3705 or

swarsmith@thebeaconjournal.com.


Or go the the site directly

http://www.ohio.com/news/94046929.html


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6533. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: The AA version of moral

psychology

From: Jim . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/18/2010 3:48:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The subject of "Moral Psychology" was brought up some years ago on

"aahistorybuffs" as to its meanings. I have found the following:


Post 292 -on AAHistoryLovers

kyyank@a ...

Date: Sun,Jun 23,2002, 11:26pm

Re: Moral psychology


Friends,

Re: Recent WDS "moral psychology" posting: Silky frequently challenged

both clergy and psychologists to assist in the public education of the

moral deficiencies found within the alcoholic population as a means to

recognize early warning signs. The difference between the use of

"psychology" (Jung), "spiritual awakening" (WDS), and "spiritual

experience" (James) are in most cases interchangeable, but explained in

detail in the new book: "SILKWORTH - The Little Doctor Who Loved Drunks"

Hazelden Education and Information Services. All of the WDS speeches

and private writings are also included within this book.


----------------------------------------
The following was taken from the new Silkworth book mentioned above:
"Doctor Silkworth presented Alcoholics Anonymous as having two distinct

parts - moral psychology and group psychology. In a 1939 article, be

blamed those who relapsed of "taking the path of least resistance - group

psychology." These people, he believed, attended meetings, engaged in

Twelve Step work, spoke at AA meetings, yet relapsed because they

ignored the importance of moral psychology, what Silkworth called "the

vital principle of Alcoholics Anonymous."
He believed alcoholism had both a physiological and and a psychological

component. Without hesitation, Dr. Silkworth always made a case that the

physiological preceded the psychological. In this regard, he said, "AA

can not do anything about the physiological phase. Once an alcoholic,

always an alcoholic. But, the plan of Alcoholics Anonymous can arrest

the psychological compulsion to drink." It is thought that Bill Wilson

later referred to this Silkworth statement at an AA convention.
Interestingly enough, Silkworth's description of the early warning signs

of alcoholism form the basis for the Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening

Test (SMAST), now used worldwide in alcoholism diagnosis.
Silkworth Alcohol Screening Test

(early warning signs)


1. Do you notice you can drink more than your friends?

2. Do you cheat about how much you can drink?

3. Is your work or personal life ignored?

4. Do you eat less when drinking?

5. Is liquor essential in your life?

6. Do you deny any of this?

7. Do you believe you can stop at any time?

8. Do you resent advice about your drinking?


In 1947, Dr. Silkworth was again approached by AA for help in

off-setting the public reaction to continued relapse among alcoholics.

There was still a large school that believed the alcoholic relapse was

indicative of a failed cure. Silkworth admonishes this population with

his article "Slips and Human Nature." Also in this article, Silkworth

likens alcoholism to other chronic diseases. In another first by a

medical doctor, he equates relapse with a failed program, much as a

tuberculosis patient might relapse if he, too, discontinued the

prescribed medication and lifestyle. He wrote, "The alcoholic 'slip' is

not a symptom of a psychotic condition. There is nothing 'screwy' about

it at all. The patient simply didn't follow directions."
Silkworth had also supported Dr. Haggard, a researcher at Yale, in his

description of relapse. "Slips and Human Nature" mimics the thoughts of

Haggard, or vise versa. In the paper, Silkworth had tired of the

discussions on relapse as a moral failure, and the subsequent blame on

the "alcoholic behavior," and attributed relapse more to simple human

nature:
Lets get it clear, once and for all, that alcoholics are human beings

just like other human beings - then we can safeguard ourselves

intelligently against most of the slips.

Both in professional and lay circles, there is a tendency to label

everything that an alcoholic may do as "alcoholic behavior." The truth

is simple human nature!
Silkworth went on to say
The slip is a relapse! It is a relapse that occurs after the alcoholic

has stopped drinking and started on the A.A. program of recovery ....

No one is startled by the fact that relapses are not uncommon among

arrested tubercular patients. But here is a startling fact - the cause is

often the same as the cause which leads to "slips" for alcoholics."
-Above excerpt from, "SILKWORTH, The Little Doctor Who Loved Drunks" -by

Dale Mitchel


----------------------------------------
On aahistorybuffs


Yüklə 25,47 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   ...   173




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə