Aa history Lovers 2010 moderators Nancy Olson and Glenn F. Chesnut page



Yüklə 25,47 Mb.
səhifə28/173
tarix18.06.2018
ölçüsü25,47 Mb.
#49655
1   ...   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   ...   173

John M

South Burlington, Vermont, US


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6447. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Upper Room

From: aalogsdon@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/10/2010 5:55:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I have a book entitled THE STORY OF THE UPPER ROOM, A 30TH anniversary

March-April 1935-1965 with photographs of copies and personnel.


(aalogsdon at aol.com)


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6448. . . . . . . . . . . . re: early issues Upper Room

From: Charlie C . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/10/2010 10:04:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Only a handful of libraries seem to have the periods you are looking for,

none


in electronic form.
These would be Lexington Theological Seminary in Kentucky, Drew University

in

New Jersey (the main Methodist archives), Lutheran Theological Seminary in



Gettysburg, Univ of Texas Austin, and Southern Methodist University.
I found this info thru the "pay" version of WorldCat, which you might be

able to


access at a local college library. The "free" version, WorldCat.org, doesn't

give quite the same detail re dates, volumes ...


You could also try contacting the Upper Room, http://upperroom.org ,

it isn't clear to me from their site what they may have, but presumably they

have a library of past issues.
Charlie C.

IM = route20guy


- - - -
From the moderator: see Message 6443

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/6443


From: glennccc@sbcglobal.net

(glennccc at sbcglobal.net)


Yes, the Upper Room headquarters in Nashville,

Tennessee has copies of all of the issues, from

the beginning, in their archives.
I was in correpondence with the present editor

several years ago, to see if they would be willing

to publish a volume with a whole year's worth of

copies from somewhere in the 1935 to 1939 period.

But this was not something that they wanted to

get involved in.


I don't know how difficult it would be to get a

look at the materials in their archives. The Upper

Room is not a library, which usually means that it

is much more difficult for a researcher to gain

access to their files.
You can still find copies of the Upper Room from

the 1935 to 1939 period on e-bay. I have a few

copies myself.
For some of the daily readings from the Upper Rooms

from the 1930's, see:


http://hindsfoot.org/uprm1.html
Glenn C. (South Bend, Indiana)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6449. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Regarding longest sobriety in

A.A.


From: Donna Whitehurst . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/11/2010 5:17:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From Donna Whitehurst, Cindy Miller, Tom White, Corey Franks, Bernard Wood,

and


Glenn Chesnut
- - - -
From: Donna Whitehurst

(justme489 at yahoo.com)


Wow, on the website listed below there is a man listed:
Barry C., April 14, 1941
Does anyone know if he is still around and if he goes to meeting? That would

be

awesome! This year will be my first international convention; are there



generally oltimers there with more than 50 years? If so, I sure want to meet

and talk with them if they are not totally surrounded all the time (smile).


Thank you for everything you do on here!!
Donna W.
- - - -
From: Cindy Miller

(cm53 at earthlink.net)


Here in Philadelphia, the 4021 Clubhouse hosted an AA meeting in memory of

Ed B.


a longtime member (1/15/51) who recently passed away with 59 years of

sobriety.


He was one of the founders of the Parkside Group -- then known as the

Parkside


Interracial Group -- formed in part because white AA's believed that black

AA's


should meet in their own groups.
- - - -
From: Tom White

(tomwhite at cableone.net)


Was interested in this list because at least in theory I could be on it. My

sober date is Oct. 17, 1959, which, coded, would be 591017. I'm a little

uncertain if all this concern with length of sobriety is at all in the

spirit of

the Program. One day at a time and all that. . . . Tom W
- - - -
From: Corey Franks

(erb2b at yahoo.com)


HI... I had a call about two weeks ago from someone in Florida telling me

that


and asking me at the same time this question. Is there anyone longer than

our


lady whose here and in New York sometimes who has more than 65 years sober

and


has been to all the Internationals as she has that you know of ? If not,

it's


Ruthie O.
- - - -
From: Bernard Wood

(bern-donna at earthlink.net)


Carl D. got sober in Dec 1947 in Muskegon, Michigan (his story was posted

here).


He was just admitted to the Bay Pines Veterans Administration hospital in St

Petersburg, Florida.


- - - -
From the moderator:

(glennccc at sbcglobal.net)


Folks are responding here to Message #6444 from Walt N.

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/6444

which points us to the Sobriety Anniversaries website which lists sobriety

anniversaries worldwide.


http://www.aahistory.com/newbirth.html
Do we have any way in fact of knowing which of the early people on this list

are


still living? Such as Cynthia C. who got sober on March 13, 1940 or Mary R.

who


got sober on June 10, 1944?
400313 Cynthia C

400511 Terry M

400815 Duke P

410414 Barry C

410417 Al M

410417 Tex A

411111 Clancy U

421010 Ed W

440610 Mary R

450111 Jack T

450613 Rosa B

450800 Cliff W

450929 Lib S

460106 Stan W

461111 Jack T

470630 Clinton F

470806 Larry S

471104 Steve H

480104 Frank B

480127 Wendy (from Iowa)

480401 Ann C

480614 David P

491231 Vernon L

500228 Leroy B

501117 Joe L

520318 John B

520909 Louise A

520918 William S

521115 Bev S

521225 Bob T

530101 Joseph J

530713 Howard A

530815 Jeff M

531105 Silva C

540419 Jack

540606 Cheeky Charley H

540828 Bill B

550427 Lee E

550715 Neill P5

551022 Jack B

560601 Bill C

560802 Millie W

560817 Richard S

560913 Isabelle Mac T

561229 Pinky H

570214 CJB

570219 Walt T

570330 John O

570404 John G

570424 Jack B

570502 Grace H

571117 Raymond M

571213 Leo R

570821 Jack C

580226 Henry R

580306 Jack H

580824 Frank H

580930 Dave H

581031 Diana H

590111 George S

590207 Ruth H

590407 Len L

590423 Lee L

590704 Rusty W

590919 George L

591217 Donald H

591224 Mike A

600104 Peter N

600205 Paul P

600214 Laurie P

600406 Jeff J

600504 Peter D

600508 Marti P

600717 John B

600725 Tom A

600923 Peter E

601002 Billie S

601027 Al C

601111 Hal K

601125 Keith M

601231 Reuben W

610104 Al W

610214 Tommie D

610306 Rosie (Al-anon) R

610401 Cactus Pete P

610515 Dorothy E

610616 Eddie W

610927 Al M


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6450. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Regarding longest sobriety in

A.A.


From: J. Lobdell . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/12/2010 11:56:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
One problem with the list for determining the longest sober living person in

AA

is that, so far as I can tell, none of those listed at the top of the list



are

living.
Of those who are easily identifiable, Barry C. and Ed W. (founders in

Minneapolis and Ed wrote the Little Red Book) are dead for many years (Ed d.

1971?).
Duke P. of Toledo likewise dead, Al M. (Los Angeles founder) also dead,

Clancy

U. of Hawaii likewise (Dick B could give you a date), Tex A. likewise (I



think

he died fairly recently, if I have the right "Tex").


I can't place Cynthia C. and should be able to if she got sober in March

1940.
Another problem is that when I get down the list to a point between Stan W.

(Jan

6 1946) and Jack T. (Nov 11 1946) I don't find Clyde B. (Jun 20 1946) whom I



know and who is alive.
Nor do I find, at the place where he ought to be, Chet H (Apr 4 1949) whom I

know and who is alive.


Nor do I find Mel B. (Apr 15 1950) whom many of us know and who is certainly

alive -- in fact he's speaking in Wapokoneta soon.


Nor do I find Clancy I. (Oct 31 [I think] 1958) whom most of AA knows and

who is


certainly alive.
I think it might repay inquiry to check out all those on the list with dates

before the longest-sober living person we have found, but I'm not entirely

hopeful we'll come up with someone.
And who WAS Cynthia C?
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6451. . . . . . . . . . . . Longest living members: any of them

solitary?

From: nuevenueve@ymail.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/13/2010 7:05:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hello Group:
Do you know whether some of the longest living AA members were solitary*

AAs?
Or who are the ones nowadays?

______________________________________
*Meaning by "solitaries" such people as platform workers, seamen, lost

little


town miners, islanders, nomadic workers, disabled people, etc).
Thank you.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6452. . . . . . . . . . . . egomaniac with inferiority complex

From: steven.calderbank@verizon.net . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/11/2010

9:34:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Does anyone know where this phrase originated?
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6453. . . . . . . . . . . . Literature reference

From: pamelafro88 . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/14/2010 3:01:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Can anyone tell me whereabouts the phrase about "if A.A. is ever destroyed,

it

will be destroyed from within" (or something similar) can be found?


Pam F.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6454. . . . . . . . . . . . Big Book foreword to 4th ed: how are

members defined?

From: martinholmes76@ymail.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/14/2010 3:50:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
In the Foreword to the 4th edition of the Big Book (published in 2001), on

page


xxiii, it says that "worldwide membership of A.A." has now grown to "an

estimated two million or more, with nearly 100,800 groups meeting in

approximately 150 countries around the world."
How did they define a member of AA when they were assembling this statistic?
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6455. . . . . . . . . . . . AA and Buddhism

From: Dougbert . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/11/2010 4:50:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
What was the name of the person who established the initial contact between

AA

and the Buddhist world? Where exactly in Thailand did it occur? Do we have



any

more details beyond the brief reference in As Bill Sees It?


Do you have any historical data on Dwight Goddard? Could he have been the

initial contact between A.A. and the Buddhist world? Did Bill W. or Dr. Bob

ever meet with Goddard and discuss Buddhism?
I am curious about page 223, As Bill Sees It, which states: "A minister in

Thailand wrote (Goddard was a minister in China and Japan), "We took A.A.s

Twelve Steps to the largest Buddhist monastery in this province, and the

head


priest (we don't have priests in Buddhism) said, 'Why, these steps are fine!

For


us as Buddhists, it might be slightly more acceptable if you had inserted

the


word 'good' in your Steps instead of 'God.' Nevertheless, you say that it is

God


as you understand Him, and that must certainly include the good. Yes, A.A.'s

Twelve Steps will surely be accepted by the Buddhists around here.'"


A former member of A.A. was Jack Kerouac the poet. He used Goddard's A

Buddhist


Bible as his primary text, as he promoted Zen Buddhism and A.A. as being

complimentary. He died of alcoholism in 1969 at the age of 47.


One American who made his own attempt to establish an American Buddhist

movement


was Dwight Goddard (1861-1939). Goddard had been a Christian missionary to

China, when he first came in contact with Buddhism. In 1928, he spent a year

living at a Zen monastery in Japan. In 1934, he founded "The Followers of

Buddha, an American Brotherhood", with the goal of applying the traditional

monastic structure of Buddhism more strictly than Senzaki and Sokei-an. The

group was largely unsuccessful: no Americans were recruited to join as monks

and

attempts failed to attract a Chinese Chan (Zen) master to come to the United



States. However, Goddard's efforts as an author and publisher bore

considerable

fruit. In 1930, he began publishing ZEN: A Buddhist Magazine. In 1932, he

collaborated with D. T. Suzuki (see below), on a translation of the

Lankavatara

Sutra. That same year, he published the first edition of A Buddhist Bible,

an

anthology of Buddhist scriptures focusing on those used in Chinese and



Japanese

Zen, which was enormously influential.[3]


The timing of Goddard's efforts and Bill W's efforts were very similar. Can

you


verify any connections?
Thanks,
Doug
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6456. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Literature reference

From: Jay Pees . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/14/2010 4:59:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
At the 1986 General Service Conference, Bob P. gave what the 1986 Final

Report


called "a powerful and inspiring closing talk" titled "Our greatest danger:

rigidity."


He said: "If you were to ask me what is the greatest danger facing A.A.

today, I would have to answer the growing rigidity - the increasing demand

for absolute answers to nit-picking questions; pressure for G.S.O. to

'enforce' our Traditions, screening alcoholics at closed meetings,

prohibiting non-Conference approved literature, i.e., 'banning books,'

laying more and more rules on groups and members. And in this trend toward

rigidity, we are drifting farther and farther away from our co-founders.

Bill, in particular, must be spinning in his grave, for he was perhaps the

most permissive person I ever met. One of his favorite sayings was 'Every

group has the right to be wrong.'"


The above comes from http://www.silkworth.net/aabiography/bobp.html I

believe if someone can find his entire speech, it will have the material

asked about in it. I know I have seen it in conjunction with this speech but

can't seem to locate it.


- - - -
From G.C. the Moderator. http://hindsfoot.org/pearson.html gives the part of

Bob


P.'s speech which was published in the 1986 General Service Conference's

final


report: "The Thirty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the General Service Conference

of

Alcoholics Anonymous 1986 (Roosevelt Hotel, New York City, April 20-26,



1986),

Final Report."


- - - -
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:01 AM, pamelafro88
wrote:
> Can anyone tell me whereabouts the phrase about "if A.A. is ever

destroyed,

> it will be destroyed from within" (or something similar) can be found?

>

> Pam F.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6457. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Re: Times and places of AA

Meetings in April 1939

From: John Barton . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/13/2010 4:01:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
This third group of "Clevelanders" were still making the drive to Akron for

the


Weds meeting. The first meeting in Cleveland was May 11. 1939. This has been

well documented in both DBGO and How it Worked.


When Bill said (not an exact quote) by 1937 this thing had jumped over to

Cleveland he didn't mean they were having meetings or an AA group (as we

know it

to be now) in Cleveland but that there was a group of "Clevelanders" who had



gotten sober.
John B
--- On Thu, 4/8/10, allan_gengler wrote:

Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Re: Times and places of AA Meetings in April 1939


> The Forward to the Second Editions says there were

> THREE groups.

>

> From the FORWARD: "A second small group promptly took



> shape at New York, to be followed in 1937 with the start of

> a third at Cleveland. Besides these, there were scattered

> alcoholics who had picked up the basic ideas in Akron or New

> York who were trying to form groups in other cities. By late

> 1937, the number of members having substantial sobriety time

> behind them was sufficient to convince the membership that a

> new light had entered the dark world of the

> alcoholic."


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6458. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: AA # 28 Gene E in NYC

From: truthfromgood12 . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/12/2010 12:12:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Folks,
help me to understand the headcount discrepancy below. If Gene E. was #28,

was


he #28 for New York? His statement below sort of implies to me that the

thought


he was #28 in Alcoholics Anonymous. My understanding is that there were

still


only 2 groups in 1939, a NY gathering and the Akron gathering. Regardless of

how


many groups, the BB states there were 'about 100' sober when it was first

published, but as I recall, there is a footnote somewhere saying it was

closer

to 80 but Bill W. rounded it up for convenience or some such thing at



publication time.
So if Gene E. was #28 does that mean for New York group? And does that

therefore

mean that if one got sober, then slipped, he lost his '# assignment'?

Probably


not, but it is odd claim to make. Point being, the implication here to me is

that of the majority of people sober, somewhere between 52 -72 additional

(to

add up to 80-100 in USA) would have had to have been in Akron.


If Gene E. meant he was #28 in all of AA society in 1939, then the 80-100

count


is nowhere near accurate as reported in Big Book. Since Gene E. says there

'were less than 10 of us around New York' in 1939, that would lead me to

believe

that Gene was #28 of anyone who had ever gotten sober via AA in NY. I



further

would conclude that Bill W. DID count anyone who got sober for some period

of

time even if they relapsed, disappeared later. How else could there be less



than

10 in fellowship in NY yet he is #28?


Regards to all,
Keith R.
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, "jomo"

wrote:


>

> Gene Edmiston was a member of my home group in 1970's in Southern

California.

> Gene was among our longest sober members on the W Coast of USA at the

time.

His


> story is quite revealing as he first came to AA in NYC just three months

after


> the 1st printing of the Big Book in 1939. Gene was 12 stepped by a friend,

Paul


> Stanley and went to Oxford Group with Bill W, Hank P, Fitz M and the rest

of

the



> NYC bunch. "I reached AA in July 4th weekend of 1939. I was the 28th AA

> member, according to Bill Wilson, in AA." (!!)

>

> In his story, Gene talks about the first NY meetings:



> "When I reached AA, there were only 3 people in New York including Bill

> Wilson, that had better than two years' sobriety. Bill had four, Parkhurst

> had three, and Fitzie Mayo had two. There were less than ten of us around

New


> York. So our meetings for nearly a year, weren't meetings. It was just

> gatherings, we'd get together, Bill would lead, and we'd talk back and

forth

> to Bill.



>

> "I'll tell you how they got away from the Oxford Group, if you don't mind.

> See, for the first four years, it was religion, strictly. well, it

happened a

> few of them were attending the Oxford Group in New York, including Bill,

because


> they weren't affiliated with a church. But some of the other boys were

going


> to Protestant Churches, the Catholic Church, and others, two or three of

them.


>

> "I went to the Oxford Group with those boys; wouldn't be over two or three

of

> us at a time. The ladies, wives, would go in and sit down; out the men



would

> come, smoke cigarettes, talk about baseball, everything.

>

> But they weren't stressing their experience of drinking (at the OG



meetings).

> They weren't getting religion there, it was spiritual. They were studying

the

> Lord's Prayer, and "Sermon on the Mount" by Emmett Fox. We used "Sermon



> on the Mount" for a couple of years after we got our Big Book. That's

where


> they got the idea for the formation of our Program.

>

> "And the reason they didn't bring Christ into the Program is, they wanted



it

> to be spiritual. Practically all religions practice the principles that we

are

> practicing in AA. But we don't say "Christ" in it. They wanted everyone



> who came in here, not be offended from a religious standpoint. Now if a

person


> of the Jewish faith would come in, and hear Jesus Christ discussed, he

> wouldn't feel comfortable, don't you see? And they got that idea out of

> 'Sermon on the Mount'."

>

> Bill W promised Gene that when the BB was reprinted, Gene's story "The



Booze

> Fighter" would be included. But after a year, Gene got drunk and by the

time

he

> got back in the early 1940's his chance to get into the BB was lost. Gene



was

> a wonderful, gentle giant of a man, an elder statesman in the finest

sense. I

> knew him for about 8 years in my home group until I moved away in 1979,

and

Gene


> passed away a few years after that, he died sober and surrounded by AA

friends.


> His full story can be read at...

> http://www.silkworth.net/aahistory/genee_aa38.html

>

> Gene's signature and that of his sponsor Paul Stanley, appear in the first



AA

> Big Book ever sold at a meeting. This book was purchased at Bill and Lois'

> home at a meeting in 1939 by Virginia McLeod and is now in AA Archives.

>

> The many signatures collected by Virginia in this book include early



members

> including Bill and Bob and Ebby, and some surprises like Jack Alexander.

This

> collection of signatures is fodder for its' own discussion thread. See it



at

> http://www.barefootsworld.net/aa-nellwing.html Nell Wing's story, and

scroll

> to a download link for a Word document.



>

> John M


> South Burlington, Vermont, US

>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


++++Message 6459. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: When Love Is Not Enough, premier

Irvington NY, April 25

From: Soberholic . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/15/2010 12:13:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Looking forward to see this magnificent story of Lois (and Bill) over here

too.
This time it would be really nice to have a dvd with subtitles in

Scandinavian

and other European languages, too.


This was not the case with "My Name Is Bill W." - the dvd was available with

Spanish and French subtitles only.


Makes me sad because of the significance of the Fellowship for so many of us

in

Europe, too. There was an initiative to get all the paper work concerning



rights done in publishing a dvd with Scandinavian subtitles in the case of

"My


Name Is Bill W." but it led nowhere. So far, at least.
Keep the good thing going on!
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6460. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: AA # 28 Gene E in NYC

From: jax760 . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/15/2010 2:42:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
For what it's worth............
Gene was the 23rd member of the New Jesrey Group of AA. He is correctly

listed


as having 6 months of sobriety as of 1/1/1940. His sponsor was Paul Kellogg

of

Roselle, NJ. Paul and Gussie Kellogg are mentioned frequently in Gene's



story as

well as in Lois Wilson's diary in 1939.


At that time, July of 1939, when Gene sobered up there were approximately 48

East Coast (NY, NJ, CT, MA & MD) members who had achieved or were struggling

to

maintain sobriety. This number (and the First One Hundred) does not include



many

well know NY pioneers who were not suceeding at that time such as Wes W,

Oscar

V, Freddie B, Russ R, Ebby T and more.


At the time the big book was published on April 1, 1939 there actually were

100


men and women who had recovered or were struggling to stay "recovered." This

includes 31 verifiable names from the Eastern Cities. I have been working

for

some time on documenting, to the extent possible, the names and sober dates



of

these men and women (The First One Hundred)and the details of their arrival

in

AA/OG. When complete, I will release this list as part of a larger effort.


For whatever reason, back in the pioneeing days, the Akronites counted up

their


members seperately from NY and vice a versa. The likely reason being is that

there were literally two seperate fellowships (Oxford Group in Akron and the

Group of Nameless Drunks in NY) until they were finally, more or less,

united as

one fellowship after the publication of the Big Book and the beginning of

meetings called "Alcoholics Anonymous" in May of 1939 (i.e Cleveland May 11,

1939 at the home of Abby Goldrich)
There are a couple of "inconsistincies" in Gene's story that I don't doubt

or

cast dispersion on but would point them out. He talks of attending OG



meetings

in NY with Bill, Hank & Fitz. It has been well documented that NY split from

the

OG in August of 37....perhaps Gene is thinking of the meetings they went to



at

Steinway Hall in the summer and fall of 39 when Emmett Fox spoke?


He says Bill told him he was AA # 28...I don't doubt this at all but Bill

frequently spoke off the cuff and was bad with numbers in general especially

dates of sobriety, dates when things occurred etc. In researching the

pioneers


and their sobriety dates there is often no rhyme or reasons as to who got

numbered and when, whether a slip did or did not reset the sober date,

whether

names and "place of order" was dropped if members left, and I have given up



trying to decipher "the numbering systems" the boys and girls used. (It

really


doesn't matter a whole lot anyway)
He talks of no more than 10 members around NY at the time....I don't doubt

that


at a typical NY meeting in the summer of 1939 when the "Manhattan Group" was

bouncing around from place to place there would only be 10 drunks not

counting

wives. (See"The Road from the Table on Clinton Street": Bill Wilson's Talk

to

the Manhattan Group, NYC, 1955)The New Jesey Group would have had a similar



number doing meetings in Montclair, South Orange and Green Pond during the

Summer and Fall of 1939.


Gene's story is a great look back at what the NY fellowship was like the

summer


of 39. I especially enjoyed reading about Gene's take on the difference

between


AA spirituality and the more "specific religious" teaching of the

OG...."principles before personalities" was the result. My thanks to John M

for

recording it and posting it on Silkworth.net where I had stumbled across it



last

year. I immediately knew that this "gem" was Gene Edmiston from the New

Jersey

Group of AA.


When I finish my reasearch on the First Forty, The First One Hundred and

"The


Golden Road of Devotion" it will be released in one form or another for all

to

see and use as they see fit.


God Bless
Another Layman on The Golden Road of Devotion
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, "truthfromgood12"

wrote:


>

> Folks,


>

> help me to understand the headcount discrepancy below. If Gene E. was #28,

was

he #28 for New York? His statement below sort of implies to me that the



thought

he was #28 in Alcoholics Anonymous. My understanding is that there were

still

only 2 groups in 1939, a NY gathering and the Akron gathering. Regardless of



how

many groups, the BB states there were 'about 100' sober when it was first

published, but as I recall, there is a footnote somewhere saying it was

closer


to 80 but Bill W. rounded it up for convenience or some such thing at

publication time.

>

> So if Gene E. was #28 does that mean for New York group? And does that



therefore mean that if one got sober, then slipped, he lost his '#

assignment'?

Probably not, but it is odd claim to make. Point being, the implication here

to

me is that of the majority of people sober, somewhere between 52 -72



additional (to add up to 80-100 in USA) would have had to have been in

Akron.


>

> If Gene E. meant he was #28 in all of AA society in 1939, then the 80-100

count is nowhere near accurate as reported in Big Book. Since Gene E. says

there 'were less than 10 of us around New York' in 1939, that would lead me

to

believe that Gene was #28 of anyone who had ever gotten sober via AA in NY.



I

further would conclude that Bill W. DID count anyone who got sober for some

period of time even if they relapsed, disappeared later. How else could

there be


less than 10 in fellowship in NY yet he is #28?

>

> Regards to all,



>

> Keith R.

>

>

> --- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, "jomo" wrote:



> >

> > Gene Edmiston was a member of my home group in 1970's in Southern

California.

> > Gene was among our longest sober members on the W Coast of USA at the

time.

His


> > story is quite revealing as he first came to AA in NYC just three months

after


> > the 1st printing of the Big Book in 1939. Gene was 12 stepped by a

friend,


Paul

> > Stanley and went to Oxford Group with Bill W, Hank P, Fitz M and the

rest of

the


> > NYC bunch. "I reached AA in July 4th weekend of 1939. I was the 28th AA

> > member, according to Bill Wilson, in AA." (!!)

> >

> > In his story, Gene talks about the first NY meetings:



> > "When I reached AA, there were only 3 people in New York including Bill

> > Wilson, that had better than two years' sobriety. Bill had four,

Parkhurst

> > had three, and Fitzie Mayo had two. There were less than ten of us

around

New


> > York. So our meetings for nearly a year, weren't meetings. It was just

> > gatherings, we'd get together, Bill would lead, and we'd talk back and

forth

> > to Bill.



> >

> > "I'll tell you how they got away from the Oxford Group, if you don't

mind.

> > See, for the first four years, it was religion, strictly. well, it



happened

a

> > few of them were attending the Oxford Group in New York, including Bill,



because

> > they weren't affiliated with a church. But some of the other boys were

going

> > to Protestant Churches, the Catholic Church, and others, two or three of



them.

> >


> > "I went to the Oxford Group with those boys; wouldn't be over two or

three


of

> > us at a time. The ladies, wives, would go in and sit down; out the men

would

> > come, smoke cigarettes, talk about baseball, everything.



> >

> > But they weren't stressing their experience of drinking (at the OG

meetings).

> > They weren't getting religion there, it was spiritual. They were

studying

the


> > Lord's Prayer, and "Sermon on the Mount" by Emmett Fox. We used "Sermon

> > on the Mount" for a couple of years after we got our Big Book. That's

where

> > they got the idea for the formation of our Program.



> >

> > "And the reason they didn't bring Christ into the Program is, they

wanted it

> > to be spiritual. Practically all religions practice the principles that

we

are


> > practicing in AA. But we don't say "Christ" in it. They wanted everyone

> > who came in here, not be offended from a religious standpoint. Now if a

person

> > of the Jewish faith would come in, and hear Jesus Christ discussed, he



> > wouldn't feel comfortable, don't you see? And they got that idea out of

> > 'Sermon on the Mount'."

> >

> > Bill W promised Gene that when the BB was reprinted, Gene's story "The



Booze

> > Fighter" would be included. But after a year, Gene got drunk and by the

time he

> > got back in the early 1940's his chance to get into the BB was lost.



Gene

was


> > a wonderful, gentle giant of a man, an elder statesman in the finest

sense.


I

> > knew him for about 8 years in my home group until I moved away in 1979,

and

Gene


> > passed away a few years after that, he died sober and surrounded by AA

friends.


> > His full story can be read at...

> > http://www.silkworth.net/aahistory/genee_aa38.html

> >

> > Gene's signature and that of his sponsor Paul Stanley, appear in the



first

AA

> > Big Book ever sold at a meeting. This book was purchased at Bill and



Lois'

> > home at a meeting in 1939 by Virginia McLeod and is now in AA Archives.

> >

> > The many signatures collected by Virginia in this book include early



members

> > including Bill and Bob and Ebby, and some surprises like Jack Alexander.

This

> > collection of signatures is fodder for its' own discussion thread. See



it

at

> > http://www.barefootsworld.net/aa-nellwing.html Nell Wing's story, and



scroll

> > to a download link for a Word document.

> >

> > John M



> > South Burlington, Vermont, US

> >


>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6461. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Times and places of AA Meetings

in April 1939

From: allan_gengler . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/14/2010 11:03:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
That's interesting. I double checked DBGO and sure enough it says this in

Chapter 12:


That night, Al went to the meeting at T. Henry's. "I attended several of

these


meetings before I discovered that not all the people there were alcoholics,"

he

said. But in spite of his being Catholic, his reaction to the meetings was



good.
"We went to Akron for several weeks," he said, "before it was finally

decided to undertake the organization of the Cleveland group. Toward the

middle

of May 1939, the first meeting was held in this room. At that meeting, there



were a number of Akron people and all the Cleveland people.
"When we began to have meetings, there was considerable debate as to what

we would call the group. Various names were suggested. No others seemed to

be

fitting, so we began to refer to ourselves as Alcoholics Anonymous."


----------
It also refers many times prior to that as the "Cleveland contingent" .....

so I


guess that's what the second edition means when it writes "A second small

group


promptly took shape at New York, to be followed in 1937 with the start of a

third at Cleveland."


So they didn't physically meet in Cleveland until May of 1939, but there was

clearly a Cleveland group.


--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, John Barton wrote:

>

> This third group of "Clevelanders" were still making the drive to Akron



for

the Weds meeting. The first meeting in Cleveland was May 11. 1939. This has

been

well documented in both DBGO and How it Worked.



>

> When Bill said (not an exact quote) by 1937 this thing had jumped over to

Cleveland he didn't mean they were having meetings or an AA group (as we

know it


to be now) in Cleveland but that there was a group of "Clevelanders" who had

gotten sober.

>

> John B


>

> --- On Thu, 4/8/10, allan_gengler wrote:

> Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Re: Times and places of AA Meetings in April

1939


>

> > The Forward to the Second Editions says there were

> > THREE groups.

> >


> > From the FORWARD: "A second small group promptly took

> > shape at New York, to be followed in 1937 with the start of

> > a third at Cleveland. Besides these, there were scattered

> > alcoholics who had picked up the basic ideas in Akron or New

> > York who were trying to form groups in other cities. By late

> > 1937, the number of members having substantial sobriety time

> > behind them was sufficient to convince the membership that a

> > new light had entered the dark world of the

> > alcoholic."

>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


++++Message 6462. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: AA # 28 Gene E in NYC

From: John Moore . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/14/2010 9:14:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I pondered the same question for years Keith. The Big Book came out in

April 1935 and Gene got sober in July ... and I did hear Gene say the same

thing many many times over the years. He knew what he was told, and he

believed he was # 28 in AA, according to Bill W.


However Gene was a newcomer at the time, and a very shaky one, so it fits

better in my mind that he was # 28 in NY, no matter what he thought. Too

late to quiz him again, but the same statement raised eyebrows in the 1970's

just as it does today.


Akron had a lot more members. Maybe if NY had around 30 members and Akron

had around 60, you might get close to 100, is what I figure.


Bill and Bob assigned numbers and I am pretty sure, from talking to my aged

sponsor, that they did not re use any numbers. In Bill's words from a talk

about the creation of the Big Book, he said that AA "boasted" about 100

members, and Bill went on to say it might well have been that, a boast...


John
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6463. . . . . . . . . . . . AA Oldtimers at the International

and What is on offer at your 1st International???

From: John R Reid . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/14/2010 6:59:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Dear Donna,
(1) Yes there are heaps of Members at the International with over 50 years

continuous Sobriety and the Oldtimers Meeting is one of the major

highlights.
(2) We are also looking forward to welcoming you and everyone else from your

Group, District, Area and Region, to the Australian Hospitality Room which

will

be in the La Reina Rooms on the mezzanine floor of the Hilton Palacio del



Rio on

the corner of Alamo and Market and across the road from the Henry Gonzalez

Convention Center.
Thanks and Kind Regards & all the very best for a successful International,

from


John R on behalf of the interim committee for the Australian DownUnder Rock

Solid Boomerang Group which will officially convene in San Antonio from 30

June

2010 and disbanded 5 July 2010. And like all new Groups we will be looking



for

Members to join the Group, to be of Service and enjoy the Fellowship & Fun

and

to Share the Hospitality with others. (all the work done by this committee



is

done in the normal 12 Step manner of not seeing reward or recognition and to

simple stay sober by being of some small service).
AA AND THE AUSTRALIAN BOOMERANG, BILL W's DETERMINATION
Why do so many Members muse the following, at the International Conventions?
"We have this unexplained but magnetic attraction to the Australian

Boomerang

pins we and why so many of us found the Australian Boomerang to be the most

essential pin for so many of us to take home from an International, but

why???"
As with all questions in the Spiritual Realm of AA's language of the heart,

the


answers can be found via good sponsorship and from approved literature.
Broken Hill Jack said "when we were active alcoholics we used the

determination

streak to get a drink, now we are sober we can use that same determination

to

stay sober, we survived when we were drinking, now we are sober we can kick



on

by going straight to God as in the first word in the Serenity Prayer and be

determined to show others how we have recovered and the benefits of long

term


sobriety will keep coming back to us, just like the Boomerang".
Bill W's experience and determination via the boomerang can be found on

Pages 29


and 30 of 'Pass It On':- Quote: Page 29/4th paragraph on: - Encouraged by

his


grandfather, Bill plunged into a succession of activities with single-minded

determination - a trait that remained with him throughout his life. One

project

that stood out in his memory was the boomerang project.


"My grandfather got in the habit of coming to me with what he thought were

impossible projects," Bill recalled. "One day he said to me, 'Will-for

that's

what he called me-'Will, I've been reading a book on Australia, and it says



that

the natives down there have something they called boomerangs, which is a

weapon

they throw, and if it misses its mark, it turns and returns to the thrower.



And

Will,' he said challengingly, 'it says in this book that nobody but an

Australian can make and throw a boomerang'
(Bill W went on) "My hackles rose when he said that no one but an Australian

could do it. I can remember how I cried out, "Well, I will be the first

white

man ever to make and throw a boomerang!" I suppose at this particular



juncture I

was 11 or 12."


For most children, Bill later reflected, such an ambition might have lasted

a

few days or at most a few weeks. "But mine was a power drive that kept on



for

six months, and I did nothing else during all that time but whittle on those

infernal boomerangs. I sawed the headboard out of my bed to get just the

right


piece of wood, and out in the old workshop at night by the light of the

lantern


I whittled away."
Finally, the day came when Bill made a boomerang that worked. He called his

grandfather to watch him as he threw the boomerang. It circled the

churchyard

near their house and almost struck Fayette in the head as it came back.


"I remember how ecstatically happy and stimulated I was by the crowning

success," Bill said. "I had become Number One man."


Success with the boomerang now set Bill to proving himself a Number One man

in

other activities. He decided that with enough perseverance and



determination, he

could do anything he set his mind to. Unquote.


Thanks are to God for our Founders, Pioneers and Oldtimers; those who have

gone


before us who had a determination streak and were prepared to persevere with

the


growth of AA and to keep coming back to provide a solid foundation for the

Fellowship.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6464. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: early issues Upper Room

From: Doug B. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/12/2010 3:37:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I have all of the Upper Rooms published from 1935 to 1960 except 4.
2 from 1954....1 from 1958 and 1 from 1959
Since it is still published and they own the copyright....making

reprints would be up to them...if you are looking something here or

there...I could scan a few....
Write directly to me at my e-mail address:

(dougb at aahistory.com)


Doug B.

http://www.aahistory.com


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6465. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: The long early drafts of the Big

Book manuscript

From: Norman Ogden . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/12/2010 3:24:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I have a copy of the early manuscript.
Write me at my e-mail address --

(etatselaer at yahoo.com)


-- and tell me your mailing address and I'll

send you one reply.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6466. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: AA and Buddhism

From: grault . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/15/2010 4:31:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Although I can't answer your questions, perhaps group members would be

interested in more recent history of A.A. in Thailand. (I've been a

long-term

visitor to Thailand for over ten years, and since retiring about four years

ago

have been living there over half each year.)


Despite the reference in As Bill Sees It, the fact is that until very

recently


A.A. in Thailand has been virtually entirely composed of expats,

English-speaking travelers, and the like. . . not Thais.


Just about three or four years ago one or two of our expat members

introduced

some of the A.A. basics to a friendly English-speaking Thai nurse

(Thailand's

"Sister Ignatia"?!) who supervises the detox and recovery program at a

"treatment center" in Khon Kaen, in northeastern Thailand... She welcomed

any

help offered, and began to use some of A.A.'s ideas.


Nowadays in Thailand, A.A. is a bit comparable to what it was in the U.S.

in,


say, 1939. It's exciting! A.A. is (very slowly and laboriously) spreading

into


indigenous non-English-speaking Thais. Each year recently an indigenous Thai

contingent has attended and enjoyed the A.A. conventions in Pattaya and Hua

Hin

(a translator is utilized for much of the program). Last year there was a



small

conference in Bangkok partially organized and funded by G.S.O. and attended

by

about twenty expat members, two English-speaking Thais, and two



representatives

from G.S.O.


Two "problems" in the spread of Thai-A.A. are that the word used for "God"

in

the Thai-language version of the Big Book means "the Christian God" to them,



and

of course the treatment center employs "A.A." for alcoholism and drug

addiction

indiscriminately. Neither issue should prevent the full spread of the

availability of A.A.'s recovery program to any and all indigenous

non-English-speaking Thai alcoholics over the next few years.


--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, Dougbert wrote:

>

> What was the name of the person who established the initial contact



between AA

and the Buddhist world? Where exactly in Thailand did it occur? Do we have

any

more details beyond the brief reference in As Bill Sees It?



>

> Do you have any historical data on Dwight Goddard? Could he have been the

initial contact between A.A. and the Buddhist world? Did Bill W. or Dr. Bob

ever meet with Goddard and discuss Buddhism?

>

> I am curious about page 223, As Bill Sees It, which states: "A minister in



Thailand wrote (Goddard was a minister in China and Japan), "We took A.A.s

Twelve Steps to the largest Buddhist monastery in this province, and the

head

priest (we don't have priests in Buddhism) said, 'Why, these steps are fine!



For

us as Buddhists, it might be slightly more acceptable if you had inserted

the

word 'good' in your Steps instead of 'God.' Nevertheless, you say that it is



God

as you understand Him, and that must certainly include the good. Yes, A.A.'s

Twelve Steps will surely be accepted by the Buddhists around here.'"

>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


++++Message 6467. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: AA # 28 Gene E in NYC

From: Gary Becktell . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/18/2010 12:47:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
In April, 1935, the Big Book was still 4 years away from 'coming out'.
G
----- Original Message -----

From: John Moore

Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Re: AA # 28 Gene E in NYC
I pondered the same question for years Keith. The Big Book came out in

April 1935 and Gene got sober in July ....


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6468. . . . . . . . . . . . 4021 Clubhouse of Philadelphia

old-timers panel April 24

From: Cindy Miller . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/16/2010 5:12:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The historic (64 years) 4021 Clubhouse of Philadelphia has a

committee of friends who are dedicated to helping it stay afloat in

these difficult financial times. They are hosting an Old-Timers Panel on

April


24, 2010 at a facility nearby.
Among the speakers will be Clyde B.( 63 years).
Also speaking is Liz B. (57 years) from Queens, NY.
And we will have Mary R., who has 50 years in Al-Anon.
The date is April 24, 2010, and the event runs from 12:00-5:00.

The address is 801 S. 48th St (Calvary Community Center) Philadelphia, PA.


P.S. Please forgive me if I have any of these sobriety times

incorrectly!!


Best,

Cindy Miller

> `·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><((((º>
- - - -
> From: "J. Lobdell"

> (jlobdell54 at hotmail.com)

>

> **64 YEARS**



>

> The longest living in the area where I live is Clyde B., June 20,

> 1946. In a couple of months or so, he will have 64 years of sobriety.

>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


++++Message 6469. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: RE: Regarding longest sobriety

in A.A.


From: Luvfrmnana@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/18/2010 3:32:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
There is one person listed on the anniversary site that seems to be missing

on

the list that is currently being discussed: Esther C., July 23, 1943. She



has

passed away as the site list states. You will find her memorial book and

part

of her story on the site also.


In His service,

Peny
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


++++Message 6470. . . . . . . . . . . . Early 1970s pamphlet: Is A.A. For

You?


From: Boyd . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/15/2010 9:08:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Does anyone have a photocopy or PDF of the early

1970's version of the A.A. pamphlet, Is A.A. For You?


Thanks, Boyd P.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6471. . . . . . . . . . . . Singleness of purpose

From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/21/2010 3:54:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From: "Dolores"

(dolli at dr-rinecker.de)


I have a question, where does the phrase

"Singleness of Purpose" come from? Who used

it first?
Dolores
- - - -
From the moderator:
I would start by looking at the Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, the

chapter


on Tradition Five, "Each group has but one primary purpose - to carry its

message to the alcoholic who still suffers."


1st line of 5th paragraph refers to: "this singleness of purpose"
And then the 1st line of the next paragraph refers to: "the wisdom of A.A.'s

single purpose."


And then several paragraphs further along it says: "Thank heaven I came up

with


the right answer for that one. It was based foursquare on the single purpose

of

A.A."


Also see the chapter on Tradition Eight:
The first paragraph says: "Every time we have tried to professionalize our

Twelfth Step, the result has been exactly the same: Our single purpose has

been

defeated."


Glenn Chesnut (South Bend, Indiana, U.S.)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6472. . . . . . . . . . . . Burning desire

From: Dolores . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/15/2010 10:42:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Greetings, Thank you all for the the information

that I have received thru History Lovers. I have

a question, where does the phrase "burning desire"

come from? Who used it first?


At the beginning of meetings, one often hears

the phrase used, "does anyone have a burning desire?"


What does this really mean? as I often find it

misused by some members to complain about other

members.
Thanks, Dolores
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6473. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: early issues Upper Room

From: John & Linda Dunn . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/20/2010 10:17:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Doug,
I wrote the Upper Room and they sent me copies

of April, May and June 1935. October, November

and December 1937.
Thought I would pass it on.
John
- - - -
From: Doug B.

Subject: Re: early issues Upper Room


I have all of the Upper Rooms published from 1935 to 1960 except 4.
2 from 1954....1 from 1958 and 1 from 1959
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6474. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: AA and Buddhism

From: JoeA . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/20/2010 6:39:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
As a practicing Rinzai Buddhist, I appreciate this thread. In the civilian

world


there is a growing body of work for Buddhists in AA and we are used to

people


twisting our structures to suit their preconceptions (such as the "head

priest"


notation in Bill W.'s story, quoted previously).
The five basic Precepts of Buddhism are; Avoid killing, avoid lying, avoid

stealing, avoid sexual misconduct and avoid intoxication. They are a good

expression of my personal work with Steps 10, 11 and 12.
Buddhism will eventual evolve to an American flavor, as it has in every

culture


it has entered since is moved out of northern India a few centuries BC (or

BCE


to use the new, hip, politically correct designation). Even when it does, it

will not be a problem for Buddhists to approach and use the Steps because of

the

very reason given by the "high priest." Most Buddhist understand that the



origins of AA through a group of Christians means the Christian themes and

terms


are both key to the message and unavoidable. It is not our charge to cut

away


the roots of what has grown within the contemporary fellowship.
Rather, in my own jobs of sponsoring and giving free classes through a local

recovery center (in Raleigh, North Carolina - not Thailand), I hope to help

people find the depth of their own religion in their quest for spirituality

and


avoid anything that might suggest they convert to my own spirituality. The

Higher Power for me is what is true, and what has been shown true throughout

my

few decades of recovery is that the truth is found by living the principles



expounded by the Steps and with all faiths. The effort to delve deeper and

wider


into the religions reveals more of the practical meaning of the Steps.
And the evidence suggests that the principles of AA have been shown to be

true


and available to anyone who follows point (c) - "that God (as you understand

god) could and would if he were sought."


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6475. . . . . . . . . . . . Act as If

From: jax760 . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/20/2010 10:28:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I recently came across this which tweaked my curiosity.
"The rule for us is perfectly simple. Do not waste time bothering whether

you


"love" thy neighbor; act as if you did. As soon as we do this we find one of

the


great secrets. When you are behaving as if you loved someone, you will

presently

come to love him."
"Some Christian writers use the word charity to describe not only Christian

love


between human beings, but also God's love for man and man's love for God.

About


the second of these two, people are often worried. They are told they ought

to

love God. They can not find any such feeling in themselves. The answer is



the

same as before. Act as if you did. Do not sit trying to manufacture

feelings.

Ask yourself, "If I were sure that I loved God, what would I do?' When you

have

found the answer go and do it.


pp.131-132 Mere Christianity C.S. Lewis
Recognizing the AA fellowship suggestions of "Act as If" and "Fake it till

you


make it" I decided to follow the trail and the joy in finding the following

from


William James
"If you want a quality, act as if you already had it."
Although I find this quote all over the internet I could not source it to a

particular work of James.


I found this by Norman Vincent Peale
Enthusiasm Makes the Difference p.20
Many years ago the noted psychologist, William James, announced his famous

"As


If" principle. He said "If you want a quality act as if already had it." Try

the


"as if" technique. It is packed with power and it works.
I also came across this Wiki Post
Sam Shoemaker gets the credit for originating the "Act As If" and "Fake It

Until


You Make It" practice that is popular in Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics

Anonymous circles. Note that Shoemaker invented that clever persuasion

technique

to help in the religious conversion of doubtful newcomers, not to help

anyone to

quit drinking or drugging:


"Act As If"
In 1954, the Reverend Samuel M. Shoemaker wrote a story about an unfortunate

who


came to him admitting that he didn't believe in God and certainly didn't

know


how to pray. Shoemaker asked him to "try an experiment," as he had nothing

to

lose. He asked him to get down on his knees and say anything at all that



came to

his mind, addressing his thoughts to "The Unknown." He then asked if the man

could read just one chapter from the Bible, from the book of John. Solely

out of


respect for Shoemaker, the man obliged, but fighting every step of the way.

This


went on for some time, until one day the man actually began praying to God

and


reading the Bible and other works on his own. The man eventually became a

spiritual leader within his church. Shoemaker believed that this was

possible

because the man "acted as if he had faith" until faith came by accident, or

"until there was an opening for God to come through."
The slogan "act as if" has been used in AA circles ever since.
A Ghost In The Closet: Is There An Alcoholic Hiding?, Dale Mitchell, Page

194.
The author of this post erroneously gives credit for "inventing" the

"technique"

to Sam Shoemaker who could have gotten it from either William James or C.S.

Lewis. But Sam surely may have introduced this to the fellowship.
I also found this by Sam Shoemaker in the October 1955 Grapevine "The

Spiritual

Angle"
"When one has done the best he can with intellectual reasoning, there yet

comes


a time for decision and action. It may be a relatively simple decision:

really


to enter wholly into the experiment. The approach is more like science than

like


philosophy. We do not so much try to reason it out in abstract logic; we

choose


a hypothesis, act as if it were true, and see whether it is. If it's not, we

can


discard it. If it is, we are free to call the experiment a success."
Several other things in the CS Lewis book caught my eye as I found many

similarites with the philosophy of the 12&12. It would appear that Lewis's

writings were an influence on both Sam Shoemaker and Father John Ford who

helped


Bill with the 12&12. But one example is given below.
12&12 p.109
From great numbers of such experiences, we could predict that the doubter

who


still claimed that he hadn't got the "spiritual angle," and who still

considered

his well-loved A.A. group the higher power, would presently love God and

call


Him by name.
CF - Lewis ..."presently come to love him."
If anyone else has any insight on Act as If or Father John Ford's work on

the


12&12 I'd be quite interested.
God Bless
John B
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6476. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Act as If

From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/21/2010 4:52:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hans Vaihinger, the "Philosophy of As If," was

the important figure here.


John,
All of these references that you have given go back, either directly or at

second hand, to a German philosopher who was very famous and extremely well

known in the very late nineteenth and early twentieth century. During that

period, all sorts of people read him and were influenced by his ideas,

although

he has become little more than a footnote or a sentence or two in modern

works

on philosophy and the history of philosophy.



__________________________________
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Vaihinger
<


Yüklə 25,47 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   ...   173




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə