Aa history Lovers 2010 moderators Nancy Olson and Glenn F. Chesnut page



Yüklə 25,47 Mb.
səhifə5/173
tarix18.06.2018
ölçüsü25,47 Mb.
#49655
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   173


against

"organized religion."


If nothing else it's unseemly considering that the vast majority of our

meetings take place in buildings that we have free access to for

extraordinarily

nominal "rents," all due to the charitable spiritual impulse of those

religious

people that many in AA seem to feel so superior towards.


Glib talk of being "spiritual" not "religious" is easy to indulge in, but I

haven't noticed it translating into buildings being constructed and

maintained

so that the spiritual impulse can be housed, and groups of drunks can have a

room to meet in.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6208. . . . . . . . . . . . Sobriety Under the Sun

From: longjohnunderwear . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/2/2010 11:57:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Sobriety Under the Sun is an English-speaking

AA convention held each winter in Puerto Vallarta

in Mexico .. coming up at the end of January.
For more info see:
http://www.aapvconvention.com/
http://www.rexark.com/collections/sobriety-under-the-sun
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6209. . . . . . . . . . . . Information on Jack Alexander''s

life


From: Geoff . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/4/2010 9:59:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Apologies if this has been covered, but I can't

find it anywhere.


Do we know anything about the life of Jack

Alexander before his involvement with AA?


Does anyone have any resources or anything that

might help me find some background information

on his bio etc?
many thanks

Geoff
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


++++Message 6210. . . . . . . . . . . . List of all Hazelden books on

alcoholism

From: diazeztone . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/5/2010 1:06:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hazelden books on alcoholism:
Has anyone ever published, studied, talked about,

or written about every book Hazelden has ever

published (including those out of print)?
I.e., a complete bibliography of Hazelden books

on alcoholism and recovery.


LD Pierce 06 15 1995
Hope all had merry christmas and happy new year!

Another Sober one for me!!

www.aabibliography.com
- - - -
From G.C. the moderator:
Or perhaps the more modest project of assembling

a complete list of all the books which Hazelden

published on the history of A.A., back when they

were still publishing books on A.A. history.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6211. . . . . . . . . . . . life of jack alexander

From: Charlie C . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/7/2010 11:47:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Re Jack Alexander, I see his obit in the NY Times for 9/20/75. It is a brief

piece, mentioning that he was from St. Louis, had worked for the St. Louis

Star

and Post-Dispatch before joining the Daily News in NYC in 1930. He then



moved to

the New Yorker, and then the Saturday Evening Post, from which he retired as

a

senior editor in 1964. He died 9/19/75 in St. Louis, and was survived by his



widow.
Charlie C.

IM = route20guy


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6212. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Information on Jack Alexander''s

life


From: Baileygc23@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/6/2010 12:24:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Jack Alexander retired to Florida and died there.

There are two different dates given for his death

date: September 19 1975 and September 17 1975.
Someone who knows how to use the obits may be

able to find more from his obit.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6213. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: life of Jack Alexander

From: Ernest Kurtz . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/7/2010 9:56:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
According to one common story, Alexander had

just finished a piece "exposing" the mob -- in

Philadelphia? Anyway, according to this story,

when he first heard of AA he thought that it,

too, had to be some kind of "racket," so he set

out to expose it.


I'll appreciate verification of this story if

anyone can come up with it, or its disproof.


ernie kurtz
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6214. . . . . . . . . . . . Requirement for time sober for

people running meetings?

From: schaberg43 . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/11/2010 11:00:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
In our area, there is a "rule" that you must

have at least ninety days (or even six months)

of sobriety before you can "run" a meeting.

In addition, several Step groups require a

year (or even two) before someone is given

"the chair."


I have been asked if there is any foundation

for this "rule" in AA's early history.


I don't know of any concrete basis for this

in the 1930s, but perhaps someone on this list

would have some knowledge of such an early

'tradition' or rule.


I also suspect that such a 'rule' might well

have been propagated in the 'AA Guideline'

binders (or whatever they were called) that

I know were sent out by GSO during the 1940s.


Can anyone help me with some more detailed

background for this "rule"?


Best,
Old Bill
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6215. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: minority opinion question

From: Stockholm Fellowship . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/7/2010 8:10:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From Jay G. in Stockholm, Bob McK., and

Dave "inkman83"


- - - -
From: Jay G. (Stockholm)

(stockholmfellowship at gmail.com)


In regard to the Minority opinion question, yes there are times where the

majority is swayed by a minority opinion.


I remember one time at the District level in Los Angeles there was an idea I

had


for a PI event. Initially everyone really liked the idea and the first vote

was


nearly unanimous in favor. During the minority opinion a concern was raised

about cost and some who voted for the idea indicated they wanted to re-vote.

In

the re-vote the idea failed overwhelmingly, with encouragement to come back



with

more details about the cost at a future meeting.


And at the Regional level in Europe there have been times when the 2/3's

threshold for passing something was met, but after the minority opinion a

re-vote was requested and the motion fell just a few votes under the

threshold.


So sometimes the minority opinion brings up something that causes a lot of

people to rethink their vote, other times just a few people. But it does

sway.

In fact, in my experience, I have only seen the minority opinion to have



much of

an effect at the District, Region or Area levels. In my experience, in the

group's conscience at the homegroup level, there tends to be such a

uniformity

that the minority opinion rarely causes a budge.
Regarding is you must always ask for the minority opinion, that varies. Some

do

it every time, some don't if the motion didn't pass in the first place.


In fellowship,

Jay G.


Stockholm, Sweden
- - - -
From: "Bob McK."

(bobnotgod2 at att.net)


The Conference Archives Committee, a secondary committee, came into being in

1998 through just such a process. It was just shy of the required 2/3 vote

for approval. Impassioned pleas by the non-prevailing side led to a

reconsideration. Most notable in the restored debate was the statement by

David E. from Hawaii who said, "I've been swaying back and forth like a palm

tree on this issue, but I think we ought to give it a chance." The vote was

indeed swayed to over a 2/3 majority and the committee was born.
When chairing any AA or AA-related debate I have always asked for minority

opinion. If nothing else, it offers the losing side an opportunity to vent

their "sour grapes." At one time in the 1998 (or possible '97) Conference

the chair allowed minority opinion after an already-reconsidered vote,

knowing full well that a second motion to reconsider is not allowed.
Furthermore full debate on the original motion may not have occurred because

of a motion calling the question or because some did not express important

issues feeling that their side was certain to prevail without their help.
- - - -
From: "inkman83" (tumbles83 at msn.com)
I was active in The North Florida Area from approximately 1994-2006 and at

least


three separate times the minority opinion swayed the majority and the vote

was


overturned. After minority opinion is heard the Chair (I believe) asked if

there is someone who voted in the majority who would like to ask for a

re-vote,

if that motion is seconded then a vote is taken to determiine if a re-vote

will

take place, if that passes then the secretary re-reads the motion and a new



vote

is taken (if I recall correctly there is no discussion on a re-vote). I

believe

this information can be found by e-mailing the Secretary or the Archivist



from

aanorthflorida.org


Hope this helps
Dave
- - - -
The two original messages were from:

"cwojohnwalter"

(cwojohnwalter at yahoo.com)

Date: Wed Jan 6, 2010


Is there a recorded precedence in which the

minority opinion was heard and then swayed the

majority opinion enough to change or table the

vote?
I realize that this might happen at the individual

group level often but I am looking for some

documentation of it happening at the Regional or

Higher Level.
I am giving a presentation about the minority

opinion and Concept V and would like to geek it

out as much as possible.
Love and Service - John
And "Is it necessary to ask the floor for

any minority opinion?"


After an issue is debated and all sides of

have been heard and after the vote is taken

and there is a simple or 2/3 majority (whichever

is required) than is it necessary to ask the

floor for the minority to state its opinion if

it so wishes?


Love and Service - John
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6216. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: life of Jack Alexander

From: Baileygc23@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/11/2010 1:59:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Boss Hague: King Hanky-Panky of Jersey

By Jack Alexander

Originally appeared in The Saturday Evening Post

on October 26, 1940

Edited by GET NJ, COPYRIGHT 2002
http://www.cityofjerseycity.org/hague/kinghankypanky/index.shtml
The Honorable Frank Hague, the perpetual mayor of Jersey City, is perhaps

the most eminent mugg in the United States. Hague was a mugg when he was

expelled from the sixth grade at thirteen as a truant and dullard, and be

was


a mugg when he started learning politics the bare-knuckles way in the tough

Horseshoe district of Jersey City in the 1890's. He was still a mugg when

he was elected mayor of that dreary human hive in 1917, in which capacity

he has held the center of the stage ever since with the grim determination

of a bad violinist. Hague will probably he known to history as a strong

character who, despite all temptations to belong to other classifications,

loyally remained a mugg to the end. This is a remarkable achievement when

you


analyze it, for Hanky-Panky, as his admirers sometimes call him, has walked

with the great and good, and their only noticeable effect on him has been

to give him a taste for expensive haberdashery. At heart and in practice, he

is a strong-arm man today, tricked out by a clever tailor to look like a

statesman.

As a wood carver fashions puppets, Hague has created governors, United

States senators, and judges of high and low degree. He has been backslapped

cordially by the President and by men who wanted to be President. He has

bossed the state of New Jersey almost as long as he has ruled Jersey City.

He

has mingled intimately with leaders of medicine and the clergy and, in a



famous civil-liberties case, was firmly kneaded and processed by the august

Supreme Court of the United States. He is listed in Who's Who in America

and,

as vice-chairman of the Democratic National Committee, he is a leader in



the Party of Humanity.

From time to time, in his twenty-three years as mayor, he has enjoyed the

investigative attentions of committees sent by the United States Senate and

the New Jersey legislature and of agents of the Justice and Treasury

departments. He has been a frequent guest at the baronial Duke Farms in

Somerville, New Jersey, and he has dandled a teacup in the parlor of Mrs E.

T.

Stotesbury, the widow of a famous Morgan partner. Yet, in spite of all these



softening influences, he persists in saying, "I have went," and in using

singular subjects with plural verbs, and vice versa. In conversation he

bellows

oracularly and jabs a long finger into his listener's clavicle to



emphasize his points, most of which boil down to his favorite argumentative

phrase,


"You know I'm right about that!" His language, when he is aroused, is

that of the gin mill. He rules his city by the nightstick and the state by

crass political barter. He is loud and vulgar and given to public displays

of

phony piety during which his enemies are dismissed as "Red," or worse.



At sixty-four, he is still erect and muscular, and he is not above

physically assaulting a quailing civil employee whom he has called on the

carpet.

None dares to hit back, for fear of being harassed by Hague's police or



being held up to public disgrace in some devious way.

A legislative committee once determined that during a seven-year period

when Hague's salary, admittedly his only source of income, totaled $56,000,

he

purchased real estate and other property for a total outlay of nearly



$400,000. This was done through dummies, and payment was made in cash. Hague

has always shied from bank accounts. Although his salary as mayor is only

$8000, has never exceeded $8500 and has been as low as $6520, Hague lives

like


a millionaire. He keeps a fourteen-room duplex apartment in Jersey City

and a suite in a plushy Manhattan hotel. He owns a palatial summer home in

Deal, New Jersey, for which he paid $125,120 - in cash - and he gambles

regularly on the horse races. Before the present war began he went to Europe

every year, traveling in the royal suites of the best liners. Now he spends

more time in Florida and at Saratoga Springs, where he flashes a bank roll,

held together by a wide rubber hand, which always contains a few $1000

notes, a denomination of which Hague is childishly fond. Hague's public

squanderings have brought Jersey City's municipal finances to a dangerous

pass.


Wholly dominated by Hague, Jersey City is the worst mess of unpunished civic

corruption in the forty-eight states.


- - - -
From G.C. the moderator: here is a chronological

list of Jack Alexander's articles from


http://www.philsp.com/homeville/FMI/d19.htm#A956
ALEXANDER, JACK (stories)

The Third Party Gets a Rich Uncle (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Sep 3 1938

Missouri Dark Mule (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Oct 8 1938; (about Sen.

Bennett Clark).

The Last Shall Be First (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Jan 14 1939; (about

Joseph Pulitzer).

He Rose from the Rich (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Mar 11, Mar 18 1939;

(about


William Bullitt).

Young Man of Manhattan (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Apr 15 1939

Reformer in the Promised Land (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Jul 22 1939;

(about


Harold Ickes).

Boss on the Spot (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Aug 26 1939; (about Enoch

Johnson).

All Father’s Chillun Got Heavens (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Nov 18

1939;

(about Father Divine).



Iron Floats to Market (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Dec 23 1939

Border Without Bayonets (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Jan 6 1940

Golden Boy; The Story of Jimmy Cromwell (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Mar

23

1940



King Hanky-Panky of Jersey (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Oct 26 1940

“Just Call Mr. C.R.” (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Feb 1 1941

Alcoholics Anonymous (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Mar 1 1941

Nervous Ice (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Apr 19 1941

Buyer No. 1 (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Jun 14 1941

The Duke of Chicago (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Jul 19 1941

The World’s Greatest Newspaper (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Jul 26 1941

Cellini to Hearst to Klotz (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Nov 1 1941

Everybody’s Business (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Sep 26 1942; A great

library


can house romance as well as books.

Ungovernable Governor (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Jan 23 1943

Cover Man (Norman Rockwell) (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Feb 13 1943

The Next Offensive in Lisbon (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Mar 6 1943

Panhandle Puck (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Jan 1 1944

They Sparked the Carrier Revolution (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Sep 16

1944

Mugwump Senator (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Feb 2 1946



Rip-Roaring Baillie (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Jun 1, Jun 8 1946

The Cities of America - Raleigh (30 of a series) (ar) The Saturday Evening

Post

Apr 12 1947



The Senate’s Remarkable Upstart (Joe McCarthy) (ar) The Saturday Evening

Post


Aug 9 1947

The Dagwood and Blondie Man (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Apr 10 1948;

about

Chic Young.



What Does Walter Reuther Want? (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Aug 21 1948

Stormy New Boss of the Pentagon (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Jul 30 1949

The Drunkard’s Best Friend (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Apr 1 1950;

Alcoholics

Anonymous.

The Ordeal of Judge Medina (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Aug 12 1950

What a President They Picked (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Feb 24 1951

They “Doctor” One Another (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Dec 6 1952

The Amazing Story of Walt Disney (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Oct 31, Nov

7

1953



The Restaurants That Nickels Built (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Dec 11,

Dec 18


1954

Death Is My Cellmate (Aaron Turner) (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Mar 2

1957

The Bank That Has No Secrets (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Nov 30 1957



Mr. Unpredictable (Foster Furcolo) (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Aug 9 1958

The Cop with the Criminal Brother (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Nov 7 1959

What Happened to Judge Crater? (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Sep 10 1960

Dreamers on the Payroll (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Nov 19 1960

Sunny But Somber Island (Corsica) (ar) The Saturday Evening Post Jul 28 1962
- - - -
Message #6213 from Ernest Kurtz

(kurtzern at umich.edu)

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/6213
According to one common story, Alexander had

just finished a piece "exposing" the mob -- in

Philadelphia? Anyway, according to this story,

when he first heard of AA he thought that it,

too, had to be some kind of "racket," so he set

out to expose it.


I'll appreciate verification of this story if

anyone can come up with it, or its disproof.


ernie kurtz
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6217. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: life of Jack Alexander

From: Ernest Kurtz . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/11/2010 8:58:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Bailey, Glenn -- you guys are really marvelous. Thank you very much.

Now I wonder whether the whole story of AA and Jack Alexander has been

collected and published anywhere? I recall some Akron mentions of

Alexander in the early correspondence. Take it away, you young sprites!


Thanks again.
ernie kurtz
On Jan 11, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Baileygc23@aol.com wrote:
> Boss Hague: King Hanky-Panky of Jersey

> By Jack Alexander

> Originally appeared in The Saturday Evening Post

> on October 26, 1940

> Edited by GET NJ, COPYRIGHT 2002

>

> http://www.cityofjerseycity.org/hague/kinghankypanky/index.shtml



>

>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6218. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: life of Jack Alexander

From: Charles Knapp . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/12/2010 4:09:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From brucec55 and Charles Knapp
- - - -
From: Bruce (

brucec55 at sbcglobal.net)


The Feb./March 2008 issue of Box 459 has a two

page article on A.A. and Jack Alexander. I do

not know who wrote it but the staff at GSO may

know.
Bruce


COPY OF THE ARTICLE ON JACK ALEXANDER:
"Jack Alexander Gave A.A. Its First Big Boost"

Box 4-5-9, February/March 2008


As the 1941 year began, Alcoholics Anonymous had about

2,000 members, many in large cities but also some in

small towns and other isolated places. A 1939 national

magazine article had attracted several hundred new

members, and newspaper articles in Cleveland and a few

other places had brought positive results. But for most of

North America, A.A. was still unknown and alcoholics

were dying without knowing that a new way of recovery

had been discovered and was working.
All of that, however, was about to change dramatically.

In less than a year, A.A. would suddenly triple its membership


Yüklə 25,47 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   173




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə