48
by their narrative tasks of business figures and new type of scientists (which,
incidentally, still needs to be created) is the demand for information, although
this issue remains relevant in the conditions of the persisting dominance of the
individualistic dominant of academic media . Part of the answer to this question
should be the proposed strategy for me to revise the notion of model structures,
proposed in the section "The question of approaches to science in neoconomics in
the aspect of the concept of a model" for explication of basic neoconomic
concepts. But this is not all – we need not only a logical structure, but also
substantive criteria of scientific methodology, permissible within its framework.
For example, the thesis of the admissibility of accepting the point of view of the
original theory / program (in this case, neoconomics) of the postulate (or their
sequence) of another theory / program, if they are relative to the original theory /
program:
do not contradict it;
anticipate its conclusions or objections in its direction (in the sense of
positive heuristics);
expand the scope of its application;
complement its software core; and of course;
answer the question posed by the original subject area to this particular
subject area.
This list for certain can be continued, but the elaboration of these things is a
matter of further specifics. Be that as it may, such a methodology should create
the basis for expert cooperation of scientific teams acting in some way in unison.
And it is all the more necessary to develop such methods of a meaningful
combination of neoconomics with the developments that are close to it, since the
neoconscious concept that has arisen in a private way breaks the very
foundations of general scientific methodology.
Design and neoconomics: a comparison of Grigoriev and Papanek's
views on project activities as creative
Within the framework of this section, an attempt is made to work out some
difficult places in the neoconomic theory related to project management-activity-
thinking, referring to the concept of "integrated design", appearing adjacent to it
and developed by its author, expressing close to neoconomic ideas in the field, at
49
first glance , not related to the economy. In the same sense, an attempt is made
to treat the fundamental economic concept of money as a specific and very
stable, but nevertheless private, human invention. In the course of the discussion,
some considerations are given, which may be further developed in separate
topics. In the end, the assumption is made about the admissibility of fundamental
differences in the function and role of monetary systems of different epochs,
depending on the wider context of the socio-economic environment, and the
tasks associated with it.
Holistic social science: is it not urbanistics?
Observation of the author of these lines for the process of collective creative
searches in the Scientific and Research Center "Neoconomics" to. 2014 – st. 2015
led to the impression that these searches, indeed, rested in the limits of the
economic narrative (since neoconomics is still a radical reflection of precisely
economic science), were marked by an attempt to exit the subject of
neoconomics towards an integral social science (none, except Karl Marx, until
now not undertaken). However, with all due respect to such a great boldness
(which is also the research program "neoconomy" in its original, economic form),
today the system conversation in the framework of such an attempt up to the
noted period of time occurs at the level of operating hypotheses about cultural-
anthropological archetypes, which, apparently, in the future is supposed to be
converted into basic universals of holistic social science knowledge. Despite the
importance of the educational and educational processes within the SIC, and
especially the unconditional importance in generating working hypotheses for the
development of a neoconomic theory, the uniqueness of this practice seems
insufficient – primarily because the study of the issues of project activity, which
neoconomics says about the main (and, perhaps, the only) direction of solving the
problems of managing social processes, and in all, and a very broad, field of social
sciences, is not reduced to this alone processes. And this despite the fact that
these problems are recognized by Grigoriev himself as more fundamental and
superior to the problem of the economy proper (in the framework of which, in
the opinion of O.Grigoriev, there are no fundamental solutions to Russian and
global problems of the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries).
In my opinion, the solution of problems of constructing integral social knowledge
is possible within the subject, although relatively recent, but already very well-
50
developed, having its name – in urbanistics, which is most easily defined as a
system of general and applied knowledge of human settlements on planet Earth,
and including data on economy, architecture, sociology, demography, political
science, social psychology and psychology of visual perception, as well as other
sciences. In this sense, urbanistics is like medicine, which, being a vast field of
activity, consisting of a multitude of complementary specializations and sciences,
is not itself a science in its own sense. An important aspect of this approach is
that it is urbanistics that makes it possible to combine the amount of knowledge
about the society with knowledge about the organization of the environment,
including the available natural resources and resources realized within the
framework of productive and constructive processes of activity (or that we also
called technology). In the same sense, creation of an urban, integrated science,
based on a neoconomic narrative as a kind of activator of the intellectual process-
a source of breakthrough conceptualizations working in positive heuristics (in the
sense of I.Lakatosh) is seen productive, as well as containing an accentuated idea
of the connection of technology with the economy. But the result will be the
formation of a holistic, knowledge-intensive activity practice, where economic
issues will be private – one that, perhaps, will overcome its very name
"urbanistics" when it incorporates practices of managing environmental and
climate systems. And since this is so, the idea of the project activity developed in
neoconomics must be expanded and go beyond the actual management of
people's activities towards the ultimate meaning of this activity, even if one
makes some other sense of it, in addition to extracting money profit. It is hardly
justifiable to talk about "natural self-regulation of demand" – even in the case of
the appearance of "the right designers" who are able to translate the work and
experience into the regularity of "watchmaking", since the society of the same
designers is ultimately the society of those who form in its daily routine, gross
demand, based on the ideas of its own needs, but in most cases and in its mass is
not able to give a competent account of either their source or their soundness:
for example, the fact that most people who want to have a home do not
knowledgeable in the hygiene of housing, at one time, I remember, said V.L.
Glazychev, and on the importance of considering producers and consumers as the
same persons, O. Grigoriev himself focused attention. On the position that
presupposes the latest circumstances in the project approach, and we will discuss
it below.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |