, the several acts and outcomings of sin,
from which the Greek Father had pronounced infants to be free. Only
in this sense were they partakers of the a]namarthsi of Christ.
§ LXVI. SYNONYMS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. 243
It is not in the Septuagint, but parakou (in the N. T. only
at Matt. xviii. 17) occurs several times there in the sense
of to disobey (Esth. iii. 3, 8; Isai. lxv. 12). Parakoh< is in
its strictest sense a failing to hear, or a hearing amiss;
the notion of active disobedience, which follows on this
inattentive or careless hearing, being superinduced upon
the word; or, it may be, the sin being regarded as already
committed in the failing to listen when God is speaking.
Bengel (on Rom. v. 19) has a good note: [para< in parakoh<
perquam apposite declarat rationem initii in lapsu Adami.
Quaeritur quomodo hominis recti intellectus aut voluntas
potuit detrimentum capere aut noxam admittere? Resp.
Intellectus et voluntas simul labavit per a]me neque
quicquam potest prius concipi, quarn a]meincuria, sicut
initium capiendae urbis est vigiliarum remissio. Hanc in-
curiam significat parakoh<, inobedientia.' It need hardly
be observed how continually in the 0. T. disobedience is
described as a refusing to hear (Jer. x . 10; xxxv. 17);
and it appears literally as such at Act vii. 57. Joined
with and following para at Heb. 2, it would there
imply, in the intention of the writer, that not merely every
actual transgression, embodying itself in an outward act
of disobedience, was punished, but ever refusal to hear,
even though it might not have asserted itself in such overt
acts of disobedience.
We have generally translated a]nomi ‘iniquity’ (Matt.
vii. 23; Rom. vi. 19; Heb. x. 17); once ‘unrighteousness’
(2 Cor. vi. 14), and once "transgression of the law"
(1 John iii. 4). It is set over against dikaiosu (2 Cor.
vi. 14; cf. Xenophon, Mem, i. 2. 24); joined with a]narxi
(Plato, Rep. ix. 575 a), with a]ntilogi (Ps lv. 10). While
a@nomoj is once at least in the N. T. used negatively of a
person without law, or to whom a law has not been given
(I Cor, ix. 21; cf. Plato, Rep. 302 e, a@nomoj monarxi);
though elsewhere of the greatest enemy of all law, the
Man of Sin, the lawless one (2 Thess. ii. 8) a]nomiis never
244 SYNONYMS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. § LXVI.
there the condition of one living without law, but always
the condition or deed of one who acts contrary to law: and
so, of course paranomi, found only at 2 Pet. ii. 16; cf.
Prov. x. 26, and paranomei?n, Acts xxiii. 3. It will follow
that where here is no law (Rom. v. 13), there may be
a[marti, but not a]nomi: being, as OEcumenius
defines it, h[ peri> to>n qeto>n no: as Fritzsche,
‘legis contemtio aut morum licentia qua lex violatur.’
Thus the Gentiles, not having a law (Rom. ii. 14), might
be charged with sin; but they, sinning without law (a]no
=xwri>j no, Rom. ii. 12; iii. 21), could not be charged
with a]nomi. It is true, indeed, that, behind that law of
Moses which they never had, there is another law, the
original law and revelation of the righteousness of God,
written on she hearts of all (Rom. ii. 14, 15); and, as
this in no human heart is obliterated quite, all sin, even
that of the darkest and most ignorant savage, must
still in a secondary sense remain as a]nomi, a violation of
this older, though partially obscured, law. Thus Origen
(in Rom. iv.): ‘Iniquitas sane a peccato hanc habet
differentiam, quod iniquitas in his dicitur quae contra
legem committuntur, unde et Graecus sermo a]nomi ap-
pellat. Peccatum vero etiam illud dici potest, si contra
quam natura docet, et conscientia arguit, delinquatur.’
Cf. Xenophon, Mem. iv. 4. 18, 19.
It is the same with para. There must be some-
thing to transgress, before there can be a transgression.
There was sin between Adam and Moses, as was attested
by the fact that there was death; but those between the
law given in Paradise (Gen. ii. 16, 17) and the law given
from Sinai, sinning indeed, yet did not sin "after the
similitude of Adam's transgression" (paraba, Rom. v.
14). With law came for the first time the possibility of
the transgression of law (Rom. iv. 15); and exactly this
transgression or trespass, is para, from parabai,
‘transilire lineam;' the French ‘forfait' (‘faire fors’ or
§ LXVI. SYNONYMS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. 245
‘hors’), some act which is excessive, enormous. Cicero
(Parad. 3): ‘Peecare est tanquam transilire lineas;’ com-
pare the Homeric u[perbasi