Aa history Lovers 2010 moderators Nancy Olson and Glenn F. Chesnut page



Yüklə 25,47 Mb.
səhifə172/173
tarix18.06.2018
ölçüsü25,47 Mb.
#49655
1   ...   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173

(hjfree at fuse.net)


Is there any list or resource to locate the authors of 4th ed. Big Book

stories?
My home group "The Eye Opener" has brought in a circuit speaker and hosted a

free anniversary breakfast for the last 10 years. As we are a Big Book Group

we

would like to make it a story author again (Lyle P. was our speaker 2 years



ago).
Anyone know a source which might have any of the authors and contact info ?
Blessed2BSober

Rob M
- - - -


WARNING FROM THE MODERATOR: everybody

please remember that it would be


A MAJOR BREACH IN ANONYMITY
if we posted the full name and contact information for a living author of a

Big


Book story in the AA History Lovers, which is part of the public media.
I'm not trying to be difficult or an obnoxious bleeding deacon, but some

members


of our group are not AA members, and anybody with a computer can read our

postings, which are completely public.


And in fact, some AA's would regard it as a breach of that person's

anonymity if

someone even communicated privately to Rob M. at his home e-mail address

that


Big Book story author's full name and/or contact information, without first

getting permission from the Big Book story author.


Does anyone have any ideas about how (and whether) we could respond to Rob's

request? Again, I'm not trying to be difficult, just seeking some guidance

from

the rest of the group.


Glenn C.
(currently buried under two feet = 0.6 meters

of snow in South Bend, Indiana)


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7059. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Authors of 4th edition Big Book

stories


From: Sherry C. Hartsell . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/14/2010 3:49:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Glenn, I do not consider your position to be "hard-ass" at all, quite the

contrary, I see you trying to do your job in a principled manner.


In response to your question, you might just contact the subject author for

permission -- or not.


Sherry C.H.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7060. . . . . . . . . . . . Is there a birthday for the Big

Book?


From: Roy Levin . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/17/2010 10:13:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Is there an official "AA Birthday" or "sobriety date" for the Big Book

itself?
What I mean, is there a day that Cornwall Press (was that the name of the

original publisher?) announced to Bill and the other AA people that the

books


were ready, and issued them the first copies? (which I believe they mailed

out


to physicians)?
Someone told me that April 11th was the official "birthdate" of the Big

Book, is


that true? Or is it best left just approximated, as April 1939?
Any feedback?
Thanks

Roy L. (class of `78)


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7061. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Who were the psychiatrists

Rowland H. saw?

From: Roy Levin . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/17/2010 9:20:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Cora:
Clancy I. of Los Angeles relates (I've heard him more than once) that

Rowland H.

did not arrange to see Dr. Jung, until AFTER Dr. Freud and Dr. Adler turned

him


down (or said they were too busy to see him).
Is there any evidence to support such statements?
Regards,
Roy L. ( class of `78 )
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7062. . . . . . . . . . . . Bob Feller''s Passing

From: Michael . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/16/2010 7:55:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Bob Feller passed away today at the age of 92:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/15/AR201012\
1507864.html?hpid=artslot [33]
An All-Star and Hall of Fame pitcher for the Cleveland Indians, he

unwittingly

played a part in helping his catcher Rollie H. break his anonymity at the

level


of press radio and film back in 1940.
Cleveland acquired Feller in 1936 while he was still a teenager. He

could throw a baseball at 100 mph but needed a veteran catcher to help

guide him. The Indians traded for an experienced catcher (Rollie H.)

from the St. Louis Browns in 1937. Rollie had a reputation for playing hard

and

drinking hard but found permanent sobriety in Akron and Cleveland in the



Spring

of 1939.
Young Bob Fellers pitching improved dramatically! In the 39 and 40 seasons

he

became a 24 and 27 game winner, and in those days they often pitched



complete

games. Rollie caught Fellers opening day no hitter in 1940, a record that

stands to this day.
In the spring of 1940 as reporters clamored around Feller and pressed him to

explain his dramatic improvement, he said he would have to give credit to

his

"ex alcoholic catcher Rollie H." (Of course he used his whole name . . . )


Suddenly Rollie found himself besieged by reporters wanting to know about

his


drinking and asking him how he sobered up. Not knowing exactly what to do he

finally said he had sobered up "with the help of and through Alcoholics

Anonymous." (Direct quote from the Cleveland Plain Dealer.) This was big

news in


sports pages all around the country! In AA history this was one of the first

big


time anonymity breaks. There were more to follow before we came up with a

firm


set of traditions to guide us.
In this instance no real harm was done to AA, in fact there was a spike in

AA

membership after this publicity. Just thought I'd pass this along. I've



always

been a fan of Rollie's and even attempted to contact Feller a couple of

years

ago (without success) to see if he had any anecdotes he could share with us



about him.
Mike Margetis

Brunswick, Maryland


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7063. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Is there a birthday for the Big

Book?


From: Arthur S . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/18/2010 4:49:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From Arthur S. and aalogsdon
- - - -
From: Arthur S

(arthur.s at live.com)


The copyright registration (dated April 19, 1939) states that the book was

"First published on the 10th day of April 1939."


Prior to publication (in January 1939) 400 copies of the multilith

manuscript

were mailed to various people (including physicians) for evaluation review

and


comments.
Cheers
Arthur
- - - -
From: (aalogsdon at aol.com)
The Copyright Office of The United States gives a publication date of April

10,


1939.
- - - -
Original message from: Roy Levin

Subject: Is there a birthday for the Big Book?


Is there an official "AA Birthday" or "sobriety date" for the Big Book

itself?
What I mean, is there a day that Cornwall Press (was that the name of the

original publisher?) announced to Bill and the other AA people that the

books


were ready, and issued them the first copies? (which I believe they mailed

out


to physicians)?
Someone told me that April 11th was the official "birthdate" of the Big

Book, is


that true? Or is it best left just approximated, as April 1939?
Any feedback?
Thanks

Roy L. (class of `78)


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7064. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Is there a birthday for the Big

Book?


From: schaberg43 . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/18/2010 9:50:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Monday, April 10, 1939 is the day that copies of the book were first

available

from the printer.
Old Bill
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7065. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: The Eye Opener (Burlington,

Vermont)


From: John Moore . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/13/2010 4:30:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Burlington Vermont's two local districts print a monthly paper entitled The

Eye


Opener. Started in the 1980's, it has continued off and on till the present.
Online version:
http://burlingtonaa.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&layout=blo

g&id\
=6&Itemid=8 [34]


John M

South Burlington, Vermont, US


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7066. . . . . . . . . . . . Is there a difference between

selfish and self-seeking? BB page 67

From: Roy Levin . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/23/2010 12:04:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Big Book page 67: "Where had we been selfish, dishonest, self-seeking and

frightened?"


I am asking all of you with 1930s era dictionaries, and knowledge of Bill

W's


talks, to help me. Did Bill ever talk about whether there was a distinction

in

meaning between the words "selfish" and "self-seeking" on page 67 in the Big



Book, where we are making our fourth step inventory?
Regards,

Roy L. (class of '78)


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7067. . . . . . . . . . . . Bill W''s 1954 Review of the

Movement


From: last_town . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/23/2010 9:38:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hello History Lovers! This is my first post.
I recently read Ernest Kurtz's Not God, where the bibliography cites "Bill's

Review of the Movement" from 1954 as "unpublished."


I wondered if this had ever found its way into print or online. It sounds

like a


fascinating document.
Thanks!

Larry H.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


++++Message 7068. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: The Eye Opener

From: Lynn Sawyer . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/14/2010 12:50:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Dear friends of AAHL,
I got sober in '79 in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and still own and read '24

Hrs. a


Day' and 'Stools and Bottles.' Read 'em in my early sober yrs.
Never was introduced to 'The Eye Opener,' however. Just thot I'd share

w/y'all.
I appreciate all of you guys's hard work!!


Lynn S.

grateful alkie

avid reader, AAHL

Sacramento, CA, USA

DOS = 10/22/79
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7069. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Defects vs shortcomings

From: Roy Levin . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/17/2010 9:30:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Also, Chuck Chamberlain in his book "A New Pair of Glasses" says he received

the


same answer from Bill W. when he asked Bill that same question, i.e. "I just

didn't want to repeat myself, using the same word twice." I don't think

Chuck C.

was making this up, I believe him.


regards

Roy L.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


++++Message 7070. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Bob Feller''s Passing

From: Aalogsdon . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/18/2010 12:57:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I talked to Bob Feller on three different occasions at his museum in Van

Meter


Iowa some years ago always about Rollie Hemsley. I had him autograph and

inscribe baseballs in memory of Rollie Hemsley. He told me that he called

him

his personal catcher and that he was the only baseball person to attend his



funeral. Feller had a great memory and told me a lot about photographs that

I

took to him to identify. He also confirmed what Rollie's speaker tape and



his

relatives had told me; that he never drank again after the initial sobriety

date

of 16 April 1939.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7071. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Bob Feller''s Passing

From: Baileygc23@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/18/2010 9:09:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Rollie Hemsley broke his anonymity and talked publicly about being a member

of

Alcoholics Anonymous ONLY AFTER newspaper stories began appearing saying



that he

had gotten sober, and saying that it was the Oxford Group which had gotten

him

sober.
"Rollie explained the difference between the Oxford Group and A.A. like



this:

'You know, if someone gave me tips about baseball and I found out he never

played, I wouldn't pay much attention to him. It's the same thing with

alcohol.'"


- - - -
FOR MORE ABOUT THIS, READ:
AA History BUFFS message no. 1011, Wed Apr 3, 2002

From: NMOlson@... moyerolson

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aahistorybuffs/message/1011
Rollie Hemsley
The first case of an anonymity break at the national level occurred in May

1940.
Ralston Burdett "Rollie" Hemsley was born June 24, 1907, in Syracuse, Ohio.

His

debut as a catcher was April 13, 1928. He was the catcher for the Cleveland



Indians, and had just caught a no-hit game pitched by Bob Feller when

publicity

about his alcoholism hit the papers. Rollie had been sober for about a year

at

that time. It was big news, not only in Cleveland and Ohio, but in the



sports

sections of newspapers throughout the country.


Rollie had once been called "Rollicking Rollie," during his drinking days.

He

had set fire to a car, raised hell on trains, caught a ball dropped from



Cleveland's Terminal Tower when drunk (and did it again sober), and was on

the


way out of the big leagues when he finally received help.
Dr. Bob called John R. in April 1939 and said: You're the only one around

here


who knows anything about baseball. Do you know a player named Rollie

Hemsley?
John replied: "Yes, sure I do. He's a catcher for the Cleveland team."


Dr. Bob said: "Well, someone brought him down here, and we've got him over

at

the hospital. You come up and talk to him."


They had put him in the hospital under a false name which reportedly made a

sportswriter at the Beacon-Journal very angry that Dr. Bob wouldn't reveal

it.

When Rollie was released from the hospital he joined the Oxford Group in



Akron.

When the Akron A.A.s left the Oxford Group, Rollie stayed with the Oxford

Group

for a time, but then joined the A.A. group in Cleveland.


So when the story of his alcoholism broke in 1940, credit for his recovery

was


given to the Oxford Group. Then Rollie broke his silence for the first time,

and gave the credit for his sobriety to Alcoholics Anonymous. This caused

some

concern among AA's, but Rollie could hardly be blamed, and the story of his



recovery in A.A. brought many new recruits.
The first story about A.A. that appeared in the Cleveland Plain Dealer (see

Post


17) spoke "a former big league ball player who is recruiting officer ..."
Rollie explained the difference between the Oxford Group and A.A. like this:

"You know, if someone gave me tips about baseball and I found out he never

played, I wouldn't pay much attention to him. It's the same thing with

alcohol."


In the Dr. Bob collection at Brown University is a 1948 Cleveland Indians

World


Series baseball, signed by player and A.A. member Rollie Hemsley and his

teammates.


Rollie died July 31, 1972, in Washington, DC.
Sources:
Dr. Bob and the Good Oldtimers

A.A. Comes of Age


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7072. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Bob Feller''s Passing

From: Bob McK. . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/19/2010 8:15:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The Cleveland Ohio AA central office (incorporated as the Cleveland District

Office) has a display case on Rollie H. which has among other things a copy

of

"Now Pitching: Bob Feller" (his autobiography) with a full chapter on Rollie



H.

It also contains a baseball signed by Feller in memory of Rollie.


These were generously donated to us by California sports memorabilia

collector Jerry L.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7073. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Who were the psychiatrists

Rowland H. saw?

From: corafinch . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/19/2010 4:52:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Roy Levin wrote:
> Clancy I. of Los Angeles relates (I've heard

> him more than once) that Rowland H. did not

> arrange to see Dr. Jung, until AFTER Dr. Freud

> and Dr. Adler turned him down (or said they

> were too busy to see him). Is there any

> evidence to support such statements?


- - - -
I think there is enough information available to put that one to rest. Amy

Bluhm


went over most of the material that I did, and in addition she had some

letters


from another part of the family. It was clear that Rowland went to Europe

specifically to be analyzed by Jung. He wasn't just looking for any famous

European psychiatrist.
Rowland's cousin Leonard Bacon had met several people in Jung's circle of

American followers (at this point, the number was still fairly small) when

he

lived in California during the early 1920s. Leonard went through a



depressive

episode in 1925 and was persuaded by these friends to go to Zurich to be

analyzed. He in turn persuaded Rowland to go, the next year.
A college friend of Rowland, George Porter, was a devoted disciple of Jung,

so

Leonard Bacon enlisted Porter's help in encouraging Rowland to go. Leonard



also

arranged for Rowland to have lunch with Kristine Mann, an analyst trained by

Jung and then practicing in New York. So no, I don't think Rowland had time

to

consider anyone other than Jung.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7074. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Who were the psychiatrists

Rowland H. saw?

From: J. Lobdell . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/23/2010 11:35:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Quite possibly George Porter and Kristine Mann were the two [American]

psychiatrists Rowland is supposed to have seen before he saw Jung.


SEE LAST PARAGRAPH IN CORA FINCH'S MESSAGE BELOW

_____________________________________________


> To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com

> From: corafinch@yahoo.com

> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:52:20 +0000

> Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Re: Who were the psychiatrists Rowland H. saw?

>

> Roy Levin wrote:



>

> > Clancy I. of Los Angeles relates (I've heard

> > him more than once) that Rowland H. did not

> > arrange to see Dr. Jung, until AFTER Dr. Freud

> > and Dr. Adler turned him down (or said they

> > were too busy to see him). Is there any

> > evidence to support such statements?

>

> - - - -



>

> I think there is enough information available to put that one to rest. Amy

Bluhm went over most of the material that I did, and in addition she had

some


letters from another part of the family. It was clear that Rowland went to

Europe specifically to be analyzed by Jung. He wasn't just looking for any

famous European psychiatrist.

>

> Rowland's cousin Leonard Bacon had met several people in Jung's circle of



American followers (at this point, the number was still fairly small) when

he

lived in California during the early 1920s. Leonard went through a



depressive

episode in 1925 and was persuaded by these friends to go to Zurich to be

analyzed. He in turn persuaded Rowland to go, the next year.

>

[GEORGE PORTER & CHRISTINE MANN:]



>

> A college friend of Rowland, George Porter, was a devoted disciple of

Jung, so

Leonard Bacon enlisted Porter's help in encouraging Rowland to go. Leonard

also

arranged for Rowland to have lunch with Kristine Mann, an analyst trained by



Jung and then practicing in New York. So no, I don't think Rowland had time

to

consider anyone other than Jung.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7075. . . . . . . . . . . . Chuck C., A New Pair of Glasses

From: John Moore . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/24/2010 10:38:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Chuck C. did not write this or any other book, by the way. He never saw "A

New


Pair of Glasses" and I wonder sometimes if he would have approved of it

being


printed. The book is a transcript of sessions of an annual retreat at Palo

Mesa


California. I think Chuck went every year, or he put it on every year ... my

recollection. I have the cassette tape copies of this retreat which was

recorded in 1975. The book came out in 1984 after his death.
My question is, was this a work in process while Chuck was still alive, and

did


he know of it? Maybe someone knows...?
John M

Burlington, Vermont

12-07-1971
- - - -
Fri, Dec 17, 2010, Roy Levin referred to something said

by
... Chuck Chamberlain in his book "A New Pair of Glasses" ....


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7076. . . . . . . . . . . . Is Grapevine literature "conference

approved"?

From: Tom V . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/9/2010 8:59:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Isn't the Grapevine generally considered to be conference approved via

Concept


3?
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7077. . . . . . . . . . . . Stories carried over from 1st to 2nd

edition of Big Book

From: Richard . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/27/2010 3:07:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
According to the prefaces to the 3rd and 4th editions of the Big Book (see

4th


edition p. xi) there were six stories carried over from the first to the

second


editions. But I only count five.
1: European Drinker

2: Home Brewmeister

3: News Hawk (Traveler, Editor, Scholar)

4: The Man Who Mastered Fear (The Fearful One)

5: Our Southern Friend

6: ???
Can anyone can help? Thanks.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7078. . . . . . . . . . . . Who were the four serious founders

of the Washingtonians?

From: Ronny . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/25/2010 4:43:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
There were six men who were sitting at Chase's Tavern in Baltimore one night

when The Washingtonian Movement was thought of. But all the things I have

read

say that only four of those six men went to the meetings and actually



started

the group.


I know the name of the original six, but does anyone know which four of them

went to the meeting the next night after they left Chase's Tavern?


- - - -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washingtonian_movement
The Washingtonian movement was a 19th century fellowship founded on April 2,

1840 by six hard drinkers (William Mitchell, David Hoss, Charles Anderson,

George Steer, Bill M'Curdy, and Tom Campbell) at Chase's Tavern on Liberty

Street in Baltimore, Maryland. The idea was that by relying on each other,

sharing their alcoholic experiences and relying upon divine help, they could

keep each other sober. Total abstinence from alcohol was their goal. The

group

taught sobriety and preceded Alcoholics Anonymous by almost a century.



Members

sought out other "drunkards" (the term alcoholic had not yet been created),

told

them their experiences with alcohol abuse and how the Society had helped



them

achieve sobriety. With the passage of time the Society became a

prohibitionist

organization in that it promoted the legal and mandatory prohibition of

alcoholic beverages. The Society was the inspiration for Timothy Shay

Arthur's


Six Nights with the Washingtonians and his Ten Nights in a Bar-Room.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7079. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Stories carried over from 1st to

2nd edition of Big Book

From: ricktompkins . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/27/2010 6:38:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From Rick Tompkins (also Jay Lawyer, Kimball Rowe, R. Peter Nixon, and

Jonathan


Lanham-Cook)
- - - -
Dr. Bob's Nightmare, of course! Across all four Editions, originally titled

"The


Doctor's Nightmare" in our First Edition.
Ciao, Rick, Illinois
__________________________________________
Original question from "Richard"

(dillonr9 at yahoo.com)
According to the prefaces to the 3rd and 4th editions of the Big Book (see

4th


edition p. xi) there were six stories carried over from the first to the

second


editions. But I only count five.
1: European Drinker

2: Home Brewmeister

3: News Hawk (Traveler, Editor, Scholar)

4: The Man Who Mastered Fear (The Fearful One)

5: Our Southern Friend

6: ???
Can anyone can help? Thanks.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7080. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Stories carried over from 1st to

2nd edition of Big Book

From: Jay Pees . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/27/2010 6:10:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
"The Car Smasher" in the first edition was re-titled "He had to be Shown" in

the


second edition according to

http://www.silkworth.net/aabiography/storyauthors.html


He was **

**Dick S.*- AA#7, from Akron, Paul

S.


Yüklə 25,47 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə