Aa history Lovers 2010 moderators Nancy Olson and Glenn F. Chesnut page



Yüklə 25,47 Mb.
səhifə171/173
tarix18.06.2018
ölçüsü25,47 Mb.
#49655
1   ...   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173
(hartsell at etex.net)

"CloydG" (cloydg449 at sbcglobal.net)

john wikelius (justjohn1431946 at yahoo.com)

Joe Adams (joeadams1950 at gmail.com)

Jonathan Lanham-Cook (lanhamcook at gmail.com)


- - - -
The original message No. 7033 was from

(kentedavis at aol.com)

who said:


I have been unable to locate a reference to anyplace where Bill said why he

used


both "defects" and "shortcomings" in the steps. Can anyone give me some help

locating a reference where Bill is quoted as to why he used these two

different

words?
4. Made a searching and fearless MORAL INVENTORY of ourselves.

5. Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact

nature of

our WRONGS.

6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these DEFECTS OF CHARACTER.

7. Humbly asked Him to remove our SHORTCOMINGS.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7040. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Defects vs shortcomings

From: planternva2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/7/2010 7:44:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
On page 22 of "A New Pair of Glasses" Chuck C. states,
"I bet there've been a million hours spent in arguing over why step six says

"...were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character"

and

step seven says "Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings."


And there's been a million hours spent on "What's the difference between

'shortcomings' and 'defects of character'?"


There's supposed to be a difference! I asked Bill, and he said, "I don't

know, I


think I didn't want to end two lines right next to each other with the same

words. They mean the same thing."


So that's going to knock a lot of arguments out, isn't it?"
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7041. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Defects vs shortcomings

From: MarionORedstone@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/7/2010 10:17:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I think there is a string on that in this data base. My recollection is that

there was not profound pondering involved. I have attended meetings since

1985

and assimilated from the wisdom of the groups the following:


So many ways to be inadequate. One of the conundrums that I have mulled is

the


various ways Bill W. expressed my inadequacies as a human being within the

Twelve Steps. First he requires that we get a piece of paper, a writing

instrument and
4. Ma[k]e a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.
But it isn't a complete inventory, all he asks is that we look at our

resentments and determine ultimately where we were at fault. He asks that we

identify our fears and respond to the rhetorical question whether self

reliance


failed us. And finally he asks that we look at our interpersonal

relationships

and determine how we could set those matters straight.
Nowhere in this supposed inventory do we compare our actions directly to any

code of moral conduct such as the Ten Commandments and assess where we were

lacking in conformance. But in the Fifth Step we do so when we:
5. Admit[ted] to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact

nature


of our wrongs.
Now we are given better direction. In a legal sense wrongs are both civil

misbehavior causing harm to one or more persons or to their property as well

as

criminal misbehavior contrary to written law. Wilson was probably familiar



with

that concept from his legal training. This is the true moral inventory in my

opinion. So it seems that this compendium of misbehavior on my part gives

evidence to the "defects of character" that Step Six addresses:


6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.
But those misbehaviors are just that, not character defects, such as

selfishness, dishonesty, procrastination, avoidance or moral laziness. We

are to

turn those defects over to God as we understand God when we:


7. Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.
Thankfully, Bill W. gives us a loophole and doesn't insist that all our

defects


of character be removed. Only those "that stand in the way of my usefulness

to

[God] and others." Seventh Step Prayer.


When I continue to address Steps Six and Seven within the Step Ten

(Spiritual

Progress Step), I again raise up to God as I understand God those

shortcomings

that stand in the way of my usefulness to God and others, all of which I

identified when I first did Step Six. I was able to be thorough because I

had

achieved a degree of "undefendedness" through my Fourth and Fifth Step



exercises.
God is near,

Marion O.R.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7042. . . . . . . . . . . . Who were the psychiatrists Rowland

H. saw in the U.S.?

From: Lois Stevens . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/9/2010 5:06:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Could you tell me who was the American psychiatrists were that Rowland H.

saw


before he went to Europe.
See the Big Book pg. 26: "For years [Rowland Hazard] had foundered from one

sanitarium to another. He had consulted the best known American

psychiatrists.

Then he had gone to Europe, placing himself in the care of a celebrated

physician (the psychiatrist, Dr. Jung) ...."
Lois S., a grateful member
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7043. . . . . . . . . . . . Who was Bobbie?

From: bob gordon . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/9/2010 4:59:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Who is the 'Bobbie' that Bill refers to in his 1944 Xmas greeting to AA?
*Greetings Christmas 1944*
Yes, it's in the air! The spirit of Christmas once more warms this

poor distraught world. Over the whole globe millions are looking

forward to that one day when strife can be forgotten, when it will be

remembered that all human beings, even the least are loved by God,

when men will hope for the coming of the Prince of Peace as they never

hoped before.


But there is another world which is not poor. Neither is it

distraught. It is the world of Alcoholics Anonymous, where thousands

dwell happily and secure. Secure because each of us, in his own way,

knows a greater power who is love, who is just, and who can be

trusted.
Nor can men and women of AA ever forget that only through suffering

did they find enough humility to enter the portals of that New World.

How privileged we are to understand so well the divine paradox that

strength rises from weakness, that humiliation goes before

resurrection; that pain is not only the price but the very touchstone

of spiritual rebirth.


Knowing it's full worth and purpose, we can no longer fear adversity,

we have found prosperity where there was poverty, peace and joy have

sprung out of the very midst of chaos.
Great indeed, our blessings!
And so,-- Merry Christmas to you all-- from the Trustees, from *Bobbie* and

from


Lois W. and Bill W.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7044. . . . . . . . . . . . The Eye Opener

From: jbringbloom . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/9/2010 1:34:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
A person in my home group mentioned a morning meditation book out of the Old

Dominion Group on the east coast, called "The Eye Opener." I have been

unable to

find any information about this. Wondering if it is still in existence? Is

it

still available? Any information would be appreciated.


In love and service, Jim R
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7045. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: The Eye Opener

From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/10/2010 7:36:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
This sounds like something different from what you were asking about, but

there


was something called The Eye Opener that was published in Los Angeles,

California, during the early AA period.

- - - -

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/1506


'The Eye Opener', Los Angeles, Cal.-"The world and other people are all

wrong?


So what? Are you going to try to straighten out the world-or you own life?

One


successful A.A. attitude is, 'If I quit drinking, get sober and

clear-headed,

then I can do something about situations that now defeat me.' Your first

problem


is: What do you do about yourself?"

- - - -


http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/1505
Grapevine, Oct. '47 -- A. A. Digest -- Excerpts from Group Publications
'The Eye Opener', Los Angeles, Calif.-"After being a member of A.A. for a

few


months I often find myself wondering, when I hear the word 'dry' used, if

there


were others who, like myself, were on a 'dry' program. A.A. is not a 'dry'

program. There's nothing arid about it; it is life itself-a life that teems

with

vitality; that is filled with serenity and happiness."



- - - -

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/1504


Grapevine, Aug. '47 -- A. A. Digest -- Excerpts from Group Publications
'The Eye Opener', Los Angeles, Calif.-"The remarkable thing about this A.A.

is

that it sneaks up on you exactly as your drinking did. All I have to do is



to

refer back to my first hypercritical attitude. Of course, when I first came

in,

everybody told me to 'relax and take it easy.' I didn't know it then but I



was

so tense when I joined A.A. that I didn't need the aid of a hypnotist to

stretch

myself between two chairs...The hardest job I had then -and still have -is



to

take it easy. I think I'm on the right track now, however ...We've found

A.A.-which means that our sobriety is practically a foregone conclusion. And

if

that be true, why not relax and enjoy it?"



- - - -

This publication is also mentioned in AAHL Messages 1502, 1499, 1487, 1485,

1484, 1466, 1462, 1460, 1423, 1401, and 1385
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7046. . . . . . . . . . . . Bobbie B.

From: James Blair . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/10/2010 8:54:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From: Manuscript of AA World History (1985) by Bob UP. (unpublished)
Info on "Bobbie" BE.
May 1, 1944, Headquarters moved into a three-room office at 415 Lexington

Avenue, opposite Grand Central Station. “We made this move,” Bill wrote,

“because the need for serving the many A.A. travelers through New York had

become urgent. Our new location near Grand Central brought us into contact

with

visitors who, for the first time, began to see Alcoholics Anonymous as a



vision

for the whole world. Thousands of A.A.’s, their families, their friends,

their

clergymen, their doctors and their employers have since visited the New York



Headquarters.”
Besides Bill, the personnel at the time of the move consisted of Margaret

“Bobbie”B., who had replaced Ruth Hock as “A.A.’s National Secretary

#2,” and

three assistants. Bill praised Bobbie for her “complete loyalty and

devotion and

her unbelievable energy and capacity for hard work.” “The growth of

Alcoholics

Anonymous continued at a pace which was to us sometimes staggering,” Bill

said.
By early 1945, the office had six full-time employees and had a budget of

$9,000


for the six-month period. In July, additional space had to be rented on the

10th


floor of the building for shipping and storage. Mrs. Lowe, the bookkeeper,

was


acting as the office manager and personnel supervisor. A search was under

way


for an assistant to Bobbie B.
The next appeal was for $11,000. As Bill explained, “As A.A. was growing,

Headquarters had to grow, too -- fortunately not as fast as A.A. did, or the

bill would never have been paid. A.A. was getting so big that we could not

possibly educate all members on what Headquarters was doing. Many groups,

preoccupied with their own affairs, failed to help us at all. Less than half

of

them contributed anything. We were plagued with constant deficits in



contributions which luckily would be plugged up with money from the sale of

the


Big Book and our growing pamphlet literature. Without this book income we

would


have folded up entirely.”
According to Nell, Bobbie B. had been a dancer in Paris in the 1920’s and,

in

the fashion of the 1940’s, wore “tiny little hats and went tripping



along in her

high heels, but was a fantastic communicator. I can’t tell you the number

of

people -- the countless, countless number of people all over the world who



owe

their sobriety to that woman. She was fantastic in that respect, but a

little

shaky on office discipline. She was really out of that part of the work.


A major step in improving the operation of the office came when, in 1949,

the


Alcoholic Foundation appointed a General Service Committee to act as an

“advisory body to the Headquarters staff in connection with those problems

of

policy and administration requiring immediate attention.” This committee,



consisting of Trustees and acting in behalf of the Foundation, oversaw the

Headquarters on a day-to-day basis, and its chairman was therefore the de

facto

volunteer manager of the office.


Henry “Hank” C. was the first person to fill both these positions and

carried


both titles. So has every general manager of C.S.O. since that time. Dennis

Manders explains, “The title Chairman of General Services meant that he

was the

liaison between the daily operations of the office and the Alcoholic



Foundation

or General Service Board. He actually wore two hats. In those days, the

general

manager chaired the publishing company meetings. And as Chairman of General



Services, he had the difficult task of having to ride herd on Bill on a

daily


basis -— and was responsible to the Board for doing so.”
When the present structure was adopted in, the General Service Committee

ceased


to exist, its function being assumed by the A.A. World Services Board -- but

the


dual responsibility of the general manager continued. Both Herb M. and Bob

H.

served as Chairmen of the General Service Committee when it was still



active,

later becoming paid general managers of G.S.O. (see below).


The appointment of the General Service Committee coincided with (and was

perhaps


prompted by) the discharge of Bobbie B. -- and soon afterward, of Charlotte

L.

as well because of alcoholic slips. According to Nell and Ann M., their



relapses

were partly caused by the enormous workload combined with confusion of the

early

office. Nell says, “The four or five movie companies and all the press



they had

to deal with, and the groups proliferating and the prisons and hospitals

starting, and the internationalists, and all -- that poor woman (Bobbie] was

just overwhelmed. The A.A. staff worked long hours all week and then

sometimes

went out to speak or to A.A. weekends, where they were ‘Mrs. A.A.’ and

people

showered them with affection and admiration. That ego-inflation was hard to



handle when they’d been sober just a few years, as they had in those days.

And


they were exhausted, too.” Bobbie and Charlotte were apparently both on

pills


for some time before they returned to drinking.
(Relapses among other staff members in the ‘50’s brought about changes

in

policy. A minimum of four years’ sobriety was established as a requirement



of

employment for the staff. The staff was encouraged to take compensatory days

off

for time worked over a weekend, including trips to attend A.A. events. This



avoided the stress of a seven—day—a—week work schedule. Also, the

number of

staff members was increased, so the workload was more reasonable and the

trips


were spread out, as well. Finally, the office became better-organized and

operating departments assumed more routine duties. For whatever reason, the

problem of slips among the A.A. staff virtually disappeared.)
With the departure of Bobbie B. and the involvement of the General Service

Committee, Headquarters activity was divided into two divisions under the

overall supervision of the Senior General Secretary, who was now Marian M.

She


was in direct charge of all public relations, dealing with the press, radio,

films, doctors, clergy, etc. She was also responsible for the management of

the

office and its personnel. She had two assistants, Ann M. and Luc P. Another



General Secretary, Ruth B., was in charge of Group Relations, also with two

assistants, Jinny T. and Polly P. The Group Relations division was charged

with

maintaining close relationships with the groups, handling group



correspondence

and personal visits, and acting as a reservoir of group experiences to draw

upon

in solving group problems.


- - - -
Additional info:
Dave B. who was the founder of AA in Quebec and his story is in the 4th

edition


of the BB was sponsored by Bobbie. He had contacted her looking for help and

for


a period of 6 months she wrote him a letter every day and included

literature

and called him periodically. Dave often stated that the contact with Bobbie

was


his life line on which his sobriety hung.
The AA Grapevine of April 1953 published an article by Bill W. in memory of

Bobbie.
- - - -


Hope this info helps
Jim B.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7047. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Who was Bobbie?

From: ricktompkins . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/10/2010 9:49:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I've had the rare opportunity to read through many hundreds of Bobbie's

letters


and she was definitely indispensable to the 1940s Alcoholic Foundation

Office


and the growth of AA.
When this Christmas card was issued, Bobbie B. (aka Margaret Burger) was

then


the only Secretary to our "AA Headquarters."
She assumed full secretarial responsibilities after Ruth Hock left the

Office in the spring of 1942 for marriage and a new Ohio home.


Bobbie was as prolific a correspondent as Ruth had been, personally

responding to thousands of letters coming to the Office from established

Groups,

new Groups, Twelfth Step referrals, and she had a wonderful gift of



cultivating

correspondent friends across the growing Fellowship. Bobbie was an AA

member, a

recovered alcoholic, a pen pal, an encouraging, compassionate AA servant,

and

was very attractive (one rare photo of her is placed with other AA pioneers



on

the second floor library wall at Bill and Lois' home in Bedford Hills).


As the 1940s rolled on, the Trustees were reluctant to approve hiring new

secretaries while Bobbie continued with the growing Office responsibilities.

Unfortunately in 1947, she suffered a physical and emotional breakdown from

the


workload and she left the AF employment. I've seen letters from around the

same


time that explained away her absence that she'd gotten engaged, but she

actually


experienced a complete nervous breakdown. Bill vigorously requested that the

Trustees assist with her medical expenses (which was granted), and at least

two

new secretaries were needed to perform the same services she had met for



five

years non-stop.


One of the new replacement secretaries was Nell Wing, who later pioneered

our


Fellowship's archives work.
Rick T., Illinois
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7048. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Who was Bobbie?

From: J. Lobdell . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/10/2010 9:59:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From Jared Lobdell and Shakey Mike
- - - -
From: "J. Lobdell"

(jlobdell54 at hotmail.com)


Margaret Roberts (Bobbie) B (1904?-1953), at that time the Secretary in New

York


City (between Ruth Hock and Nell Wing).
- - - -
From: "Michael D Gwirtz"

(Shakey1aa at aol.com)


Margaret "Bobbie" Berger, a.k.a. "Lambie Pie" (Bill had nicknames for all

his


secretaries).
Shakey Mike
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7049. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: The Eye Opener

From: Tom Hickcox . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/10/2010 10:03:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
At 12:34 12/9/2010, jbringbloom wrote:
>A person in my home group mentioned a morning meditation book out of

>the Old Dominion Group on the east coast, called "The Eye Opener." I

>have been unable to find any information about this. Wondering if it

>is still in existence? Is it still available? Any information would

>be appreciated.
There is an Eye Opener you can purchase from Amazon for $11.86

http://www.amazon.com/Eye-Opener-Alcoholics/dp/0894860232

as well as Hazelden.
Tommy H in Baton Rouge
- - - -
From: "Virgil"
It's a Hazelden publication, and it still can be ordered. First one I ever

got


came in a boxed set along with; The Little Red Book, Stools and Bottles, and

I

believe Day By Day. Cost about 12.95 each. Amazon carries it.


- - - -
From: Tim DeRan
In my collection of daily reader/meditation books, I have one light blue

covered


book with the words "The Eye Opener" on it. This book is a daily reader

similar


to many of the other daily reader/meditation books that are available. I

have


had it for many years. I checked the Hazelden site and the same book is

available from them for about $13.95 plus tax and shipping.


- - - -
From: "Michael D Gwirtz"

From: "Theron B."

From: J Chooutla

From: Rick Hoffmeister


Buy the book at Hazelden. Also available on Amazon.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7050. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: The Eye Opener

From: J. Lobdell . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/11/2010 2:49:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Since you ask --
The Eye Opener Hardcover

Hardcover, 384 pages

Item: 1020

ISBN-10: 0894860232

ISBN-13: 9780894860232

Publisher: Hazelden

Published Year: 1967
List Price: $13.95 Each

Online Price: $12.55 Each


The late Ambrose M., Delegate from Eastern PA 1979-80, was buried with his

copies of 24 Hours a Day, The Little Red Book, Stools and Bottles, and The

Eye-Opener. "Eye-Opener" is also a fairly common name for 7 a.m. meetings,

not


only in California. I think the first edition may have been earlier than

1967


(Google books gives a pub date of 1965).
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7051. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: The Eye Opener (Los Angeles

version)


From: Charles Knapp . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/10/2010 11:21:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hello Group,
The publication Glenn is talking about was the Los Angeles, California,

Central


Office newsletter called "The Eye Opener." It was only published for a

little


over two years. It ran from Sept or Oct 1945 until Feb 1948. Members in

Southern


California did not or could not support the newsletter financially and it

became too costly to publish for free. The LA Central Office would not have

another newsletter until about 1972. That publication is called "Hello

Central"


and is still being published today.
Hope that helps
Charles from Wisconsin
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7052. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: The Eye Opener (Oklahoma prison

newsletter)

From: Chris Budnick . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/11/2010 12:59:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
There is a prison based AA newsletter from McAlester, Oklahoma, called "Eye

Opener." I've seen reference to it as early as 1955 in the South Dakota

State

Penitentiary newsletter the AlconAire. And I've got three images of covers



of

the Eye Opener from the early 1970's.


Chris B.

Raleigh, North Carolina


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7053. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: The Eye Opener

From: diazeztone . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/11/2010 7:59:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I thought I had built a page about this book on my website

(aabibliography.com)

but apparently not (looks like to need to get one done!)
The eye opener
http://books.google.com/books?id=7aG9ioHYN5gC&lpg=PP1&dq=book%20the%20eye%20

open\
er%20alcoholics&pg=RA1-PA6#v=onepage&q&f=false [31]


Alcoholics Anonymous
THE EYE OPENER
FIRST PRINTING
Sponsored by Alexandria Group
This book is in excellent condition. Pictured are two books - the black one

is

the first printing done by the group in Alexandria and the little blue one



is an

early printing done by Hazelden. (I'm including that one in as a bonus)


These first printings have been listed on Ebay this past year for over

$1,000.


They are certainly very difficult to find and this copy is near min
PREFACE

"This little book is dedicated to bring various phases of AA philosophy to

the arrested alcoholic ans interpreted and understood by the author. It is

not


in any sense official, for AA has no official opinion and each member speaks

only for himself.

"The author of this poor work is neither a writer nor a scholar. His

philosophy is not original and was gleaned from many sources.

If some hear is made lighter, some happier, or some soul strengthened, we

will feel bountifully repaid for our efforts."


The publishers gratefully acknowledge the generosity of T.W.R.
the amazon page has a six page preview of the book also.
LD Pierce

http://www.aabibliography.com


--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, "jbringbloom"

wrote:


>

> A person in my home group mentioned a morning meditation book out of the

Old

Dominion Group on the east coast, called "The Eye Opener." I have been



unable to

find any information about this. Wondering if it is still in existence? Is

it

still available? Any information would be appreciated.



>

> In love and service, Jim R

>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7054. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: The Eye Opener

From: Michael . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/11/2010 10:31:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi Jim,
Hazelden took over publication of this book many years ago. When I came in

the


Fellowship (1978) this was a very popular book and was usually available at

meetings that had a literature table, along with the Little Red Book, Twenty

Four Hours a Day, etc.
It's still available through Hazelden. I have one very old version of

the book that still has the groups name in it, and also a newer one from

Hazelden. I sobered up in the DC area, so considering the books origin it

might


have been a little more popular around here.
http://www.hazelden.org/OA_HTML/ibeCCtpItmDspRte.jsp?item=58103&sitex=10020:

2237\
2:US [32]


Mike Margetis

Brunswick, MD


- - - -
From: "oys.jerry@gmail.com"
The Eye Opener Is published by Hazelden. It is still in print and readily

available.


I PURCHASED MY COPY BETWEEN 1972-1974.
In love and service.
Jerry Oys

Southern Minnesota Area Archivist


- - - -
From: John Barton
The Eye Opener is a meditation book published by Hazelden, often

sold as a set with the 24 Hour Book and Stools & Bottles.


PUBLICATION DATE IS GIVEN AS 1967
- - - -
From: "Virgil"

From: N FINLAYSON

From: "Janis R"
Available from Hazelden and Amazon
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7055. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Who were the psychiatrists

Rowland H. saw in the U.S.?

From: corafinch . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/11/2010 7:52:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Lois and Group,

Years ago I spent quite some time with Rowland's checking account ledgers.

One

of the things I did was to write down the names of all the doctors he had



paid,

and try to make some sense of the list. There were quite a few.


It was easy to tell which doctors treated RH himself, as the family member

treated was identified by initials with each check. Part of the reason for

the

large number treating Rowland may have been that during prohibition, the



only

legal alcohol was alcohol prescribed by a physician (communion wine was one

of

the few other exceptions), and each doctor could prescribe only a certain



amount

for each patient. It was not uncommon for alcoholic patients to go to a

number

of doctors. So it is impossible to know which doctors Rowland was consulting



for

help to get his drinking in control, and which ones were just rationalizing

that

he might actually need the alcohol.


I googled each name and came up with only a few of note. One doctor he saw

frequently was Dr. Samuel Lambert, brother of Dr. Alexander Lambert who was

once

involved with Town's Hospital. Samuel Lambert, unlike Alexander, thought



that

alcohol had medical value so he was likely prescribing it for RH. Rowland

also

briefly saw a Dr. Quackenbos, who may have been a hypnotist.


The specific term "psychiatrist," BTW, was not in as common use then as now.

I

will assume you mean any doctors whose treatment probably included



psychological

care.
The first mention I saw of treatment was not actually a doctor's name but a

remark in an aunt's letter dated 1924, "I hear Roy has gone to an exercise

place. I assume that means a relapse." I had to read that one over a few

times

to believe that she had really put it that way. The language just sounded



too

modern. I can't see how the relapse could have been anything other than

alcoholism, as he had no other chronic conditions.
Around 1925, he had a consultation or two (not extended therapy) with Dr.

Edward


Zabriskie, head of New York's Neurologic Institute. Zabriskie was one of the

best-known neurologists in New York, and it is interesting that a few years

earlier Dr. Zabriskie had helped Sam Shoemaker study psychological treatment

while Sam was in training for the ministry.


In the summer of 1925, Rowland went into extended treatment with Dr. Austen

Fox


Riggs in Stockbridge, MA. He was there for a month, then returned about once

a

month through the end of the year. He was on his way to return to Dr. Riggs



care

in the spring of 1926 (not exactly of his own volition but because his wife

said

so), when he was persuaded to go to Jung in Zurich instead.


Rowland was treated by other doctors/therapists after Jung, but your

question


concerned only those before. You are probably lucky I can't find all my

notes!
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


++++Message 7056. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Who was Bobbie? -- contact with

Addicts Anonymous

From: Chris Budnick . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/11/2010 1:03:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I've seen correspondence between Bobbie and a man named Clarence B.

regarding Addicts Anonymous from 1949.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 7057. . . . . . . . . . . . Authors of 4th edition Big Book

stories


From: hjfree2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/14/2010 6:16:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
FROM THE MODERATOR: before sending in an e-mail trying to answer Rob M.'s

question, please read my warning below, about breaches of anonymity. --

Glenn C.
- - - -
This question is from: Rob M


Yüklə 25,47 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə