Etnos
v
ə epos: keçmişdən bugünə
363
вам больше не удастся. Обманывая другие народы, вы «зарабо-
тали» для армян неприятие. Такое неприятие «заслужил» и
один из классиков армянской поэзии Паруйр Севак, «благо-
даря» монографии Б.Зулумян.
А.Оганян неоднократно пишет, что в монографии Б.Зу-
лумян нет ни одной строки, где мысли и факты не противоре-
чили самой простой истине. Вот как оказывается. Армянские
литературоведы, также как и армянские историки с большим
успехом склоняются к искажениям, к компиляциям. И вы под-
нимаете свой голос. Здесь, А.Оганян, мы вас приветствуем, так
как у вас появилось мужество говорить правду. Ту правду, о
которой все знают. В том числе знаете и вы, армянская интел-
лигенция. Еще в разгар Карабахских событий по горячим
следам этой трагедии один армянский автор (Аракелов Р.К. На-
горный Карабах: Виновники трагедии известны: - Баку, Шарг –
Гарб, 1991) попытался сказать всему миру правду, который во
вводной части своей книги писал: «…Карабах остается…
кровоточащей раной Азербайджана. Возникнув как явление
внешне многоплановое, а в действительности однозначное и
сводящееся к попытке захвата Нагорного Карабаха в пользу
Армении как аграрной базы ее националистическими кругами
новой государственности – своеобразной наследницы давно ка-
нувшей в небытие мифической «Великой Армении», … Кара-
бахское движение как авантюра из разряда переделов мира
противоречило и международному праву и конституции стра-
ны» (с.3-4). Эти строки писал человек, который убедился в фак-
тах и исторических событиях, где правда находилась и нахо-
дится на стороне азербайджанцев.
Р.Аракелов, армянин по национальности, отмечал, что
националистические круги Армении «давно уж поднаторели в
деле изгнания из Армении людей иной национальности, дейст-
вуя при этом по-разному: иногда по-иезуитски более утончен-
но, хоть и не менее подло, а иногда и жестоко, как это случи-
лось в Гугаркском районе Армении, где было убито не менее
Nizami Tağısoy
364
ста азербайджанцев» (указанная работа Р.Аракелова). Поль-
зуясь разными методами, вы сделали Армению моноэ-тниче-
ской республикой, заполучив по этой части пальму первенства
среди стран всего Мира (подчеркнуто нами – Н.М.).
Вы можете сказать, какое отношение имеет все это к ис-
кажениям в армянском литературоведении и историографии? Я
бы сказал самое прямое. Ибо вы убегаете от правды, если убе-
гаете от правды, то склонны к искажениям. Р.Аракелов, живя в
Карабахе, говорил своим соотечественникам правду, большин-
ство из них ему не поверило, назвав его подосланным кем-то
лицом, терроризировали своих же людей по отношению к не-
му. Значит, армяне не любят людей, которые говорят или хотя
бы пытаются говорить правду. А.Оганян, поэтому у Вас все ис-
кореживается, и многим из вас это нравится. Соответственно
вы потеряли ориентир. И эта потеря вашему народу дорого
обойдется. Одни из вас фальсифицируют историю, другие эт-
нографию, третьи армянскую литературу, жизнь и деятель-
ность армянских писателей. И так продолжаете. Однако вам
следовало бы обратиться не к фальсифицированным армянски-
ми деятелями фактам, а к подлинной истории народов и таким
немаловажным источникам как Мамедова Ф. Политическая ис-
тория и историческая география Азербайджана. (Б., 1993 г.);
Глинка С.Описание переселения армян азербайджанских в пре-
делы России. (М.; Типография Лазаревых, 1831 г.); Величко
В.Л. Кавказ. Русские дело и межплеменные вопросы. (Петер-
бург, 1904 г.); Грибоедов А.С. Горе от ума, письма и записки.
(Б., 1989 г.); Жорж де Малевил. Армянская трагедия 1915 года.
(Б., 1990); Гурко-Кряжин. Армянский вопрос. (М.; 1926 г.); Ка-
надпев И.К. Очерки закавказской жизни. (С. Петербург, 1902
г.); Помпеев Ю. Кровавый омут Карабаха. (Б., 1992 г.); Чавча-
вадзе И.Г. Армянские ученые и вопиющие камни. (Тифлис,
1902 г.); Гейбуллаев Г. Древние турки и Армения. (Б., 1992 г.);
Алиев И. Нагорный Карабах: История. Факты. События. (Б.,
1992 г.); Ахундова Э. Ходжалы. – Хроника геноцида. (Б., 1993
Etnos
v
ə epos: keçmişdən bugünə
365
г.); Исмаилов М. События вокруг НКАО в кривом зеркале
фальсификаторов. (Б., 1989 г.) и мн. др. Эти материалы, авторы
которых в подавляющем большинстве являются учеными неа-
зербайджанской национальности, стремятся говорить правду и
не врут, как это делает в своей монографии Б.Зулумян и ей по-
добные. Здесь между историей и литературоведением мы ус-
матриваем самую непосредственную связь. Фальсификацию не
терпит не только сама история, но и литература. Как говорил
великий русский критик В.Г.Белинский «Поэзия верна исто-
рии: чего не сохранила история, того не передаст и поэзия» (Бе-
линский В.Г. Полн.собр. соч.; Т 5. – М.; Изд-во Ан СССР, 1954,
С. 356-357).
Если, конечно, вы последовательно и целенаправленно
будете искать изъяны, искажения фактов в вашей литературе и
в отношении творчества других армянских писателей, то най-
дете их в несметном количестве. Может быть, вы воспрянули
духом? Вас мучает совесть? То тогда говорите об этом во весь
голос своим соотечественникам – ученым-фальсификаторам
армянской истории и литературы. Время не ждет. Оно уже не
движется в вашу пользу. Очнитесь, умейте смотреть правде в
глаза.
Nizami Tağısoy
366
ARMENIAN LITERATURE IS COMPALIATION AS
ARMENIAN HISTOGRAPHY
The Armenian literary criticism like the Armenian historiog-
raphy consist of compilations. Having bought the next copy of Lite-
rary newspaper (March, 16-20, 2005) 1 fluently looked it through.
At this time on page 14 I saw the article of the Armenian author and
the member of the Union of writer of Armenia Albert Oqanyan
"The False portrait". The article is devoted to the analysis of
monographic work by B. Zuluman "Creativity of Paruy Sevak in
context of the Armenian poetry" publishted by the Institute of world
literature named M.Gorki (MIMLIR 20Ö2-157p.) The author of this
article writes that taking into hands the monograph he opened it
with special excitements, as P.S. wasn't only classic of the Armeni-
an literary for him was also his fırst scientific lider. A.O. says that at
first sight while reading it he found out from the fırst pages a lot of
mistakes and discrepancies in such serious work, for example on
page 3 it's printed that Sevak was born in 1926 and after several
lines: "At the age of 43 he died in a car accident," it means that P.S.
was born 1924 and died in 1071, he didn't 43 years but he iived 47
years. A.O. writers that these dates are repeated in the book many
times and that's why it's impossible to consider them imprint. But in
reality neither his birthday nor his date of death corresponds to Ar-
menian reference books, encyclopedias and textbooks. If discrepan-
cies and distortions had been exhausted then it might have not been
told about it. However according to A.O. B.Z. borrowed carelessly
and indistinctly from the other Armenian author A.A., his ideas re-
peated at list 6 times in the book. Word for word he copies all A.A's
statements but in this case he doesn't follow the precise line either.
B.Z's work consist of 10 parts, 4 of them (the author of the critical
article A.O. states it) have nothing to do with P.S's creativity.
Analyzing B.Z's monograph A.O. writes that in spite of the fact
though this work is devoted creativity of the concrete author, it's
Etnos
v
ə epos: keçmişdən bugünə
367
surprising that the theme of "Art search of Western-European poet-
ry of the beginning of the 19 century" and the theme of "Motherland
in works of V.T. and E.C'are fıgured. According A.O. 80 pages out
of 156 pages are devoted to separate matters of culture and literary
of Armenian. Further, analyzing B.Z's monography A.O. writes that
he couldn't fınd any exactly developed scientifıc conception. The
only thing which unites all the parts of the book is distortions of the
P.S's portrait, general image of the Armenian poetry of the 19 cen-
tury. Basing on own judgments and the given rough mistakes both
in the plan of historical facts and in the plan of representing of A.O.
calls B.Z's monography compilation coliection. When B.Z. tries to
demonstrate his translation skill, he offends the name of the founder
of the Armenian alphabets M.M.. According to the author of the
article such offensive attitude to classics of the Armenian culture
surprises bitterly. While reading critical material concerning B.Z's
book I feel its author's anger. Arid then I want to ask: "what should
we Azerbaijanis do that you for more 2 centuries (here we mean the
Armenian historians, culture figures who alway s straight to distort
the original history of our nation -N.M.) trample down all the facts
concerning our history. You don't fıll ashamed that knowing about
these distortions you continue lying and lying to the world
community." It's good that Armenian intelligence sometimes admits
own distortions. However a lot of counter questions appear. How
doesn't A.O. stand the distortions concerning Armenian literary? It's
hard to believe it. Can't A.O. and Armenian intelligence have
known that not only their literature but history, the history of culture
have been represented in a false way, the culture whish has been
backed out by force and compilatively made up from Albania
history and culture. That's why we want to bring your attention
that(Armenian history – N.M.) it has been stolen, usurped
compelatively from the life and history of other people. A.O., if you
don't like these distortion then be kind take and destroy your forged
history without respecting the historical facts and sources you
shamelessly prove that you are (Armenians - N.M.) "the oldest",
Nizami Tağısoy
368
"the cleverest", "the unhappiest people" as if beginning from the
rivers Tiger and Efrat, the Black Sea to the Caspian Sea and may be
and half of the Earth - all belonged to you. Without shame you
claim that your parliament is the most democratic in the world, that
your people are hospitable though historians repeatedly say that to
be an Armenian is very dangerous and the Armenians admit this
fact too (remember the book by Kanadeyeva "Sketches about
Transcaucasion"). You said that the cleverest philosophers the
Armenian, the tastes dishes are Armenian too. You say as if your
people bear the palm of the championship on the planet. The rest of
the nations appeared after yours that's why you gave much to the
world civilization, and culture. In this way you always thought
highly of yourselves. But your originally face is familiar well to
other people. That's why you Wont be able to deceive the other
people any more. Unfortunately by deceiving the others you have
"gained" hatred to Armenian people. "Due" to Z's monography one
of the classics of Armenian poetry P.S. seemed to have "deserved".
A.O. repeatedly writes that there isn't any line in B.Z's monography,
where ideas and facts not to contradict the true. Armenian literary
criticism as Armenian historians successfully decline distortions
and compilations. In this case we are welcome you because you
found courage to tell the truth, that true which knows everybody.
Also know you, Armenian intelligency. In heat Karabakh events by
hot traces of this tragedy 1 Armenian author( Arakelov R. K.
Nagorno - Karabakh: "Originators of the tragedy is known Baku,
Sharg - Garb 1991") tried to tell all word the true, which in
introduction part of his book wrote: "Karabakh remain bled wound
of Azerbaijan". Arised as a multi planned, but in real unequivocal
and reduced trying capture Nagorno - Karabakh benefit Armenian
as agrarian base of it nationalist circles new statehood peculiar
successor sinked for along time ago in nonexistence mythical
"Great Armenia ", Karabakh movement like a venture from
category repartitions of world contradict international right and
constitutions of the country (p.3-4). These lines wrote the man who
Etnos
v
ə epos: keçmişdən bugünə
369
convinced in facts and history events, where the true was and be on
Azerbaijani people side R.Arapelov - is Armenian by nationality
noticed that nationality circle's of Armenia "already had habit to
expel from Armenian, the people other nations, acting differently
sometimes attenuation but meanly, and sometimes cruel, as it
happened in Gugar region of Armenia, where was killed more than
100 Azerbaijanis"( was underlined by us - N.M.) Using different
methods you make Armenia monoethnic republic, caught by this
part superiority palm in the world. Can you tell what relation
between this and distortion in Armenia literary criticism and
historiography? I would tell so straight you escape the true and if it
is so that's why therefore you are at distortions. When P.A. lived in
Karabakh he said to his compatriots the true, many of them didn't
believe him, and named him the person was sent by anyone, also
terrorized people to him. It mean that Armenian doesn't like people
who tells or try to tell the truth. A.O. that's why everything is
mangled in your place and many of you like it. That's why you lost
orienting. And this loss made you to pay much. Ones of you forge
history others ethnography 3-d Armenian literary, life and activity
Armenian authors. So you going on. But you should convent not
falsify Armenian activity facts but original people's history and
being important source as Mameda F. Political history and
Azerbaijan historiography - Baku 1993: G. S. Description
resettlement Azerbaijani Armenians in Russia Baku-1990:
Velichina V. L. Caucas. Russian works and questions between
tribes B.,1990 ; Griboyedov A. S. " Gore ot uma,
letters and notices "- 1989; G.M. Armenian tragedy 1915 - B.
1990; Gyrko-Kryajin. Armenian question. -B., 1990, Kanadpev I.K.
"Sketches about Transcaucasion"- B. 1990, Pompeyev YU. "Bloody
whirlpool of Karabakh "- B., 1992; Gavgadze I.G. Armenian
Scientifics and crying stones - B. 1990; Geybullayev G. "Old
Turkish and Armenian "- B., 1992; Aliyev and Nagorno- Karabakh:
History. Facts. Events. - B. 1992; Axundova E. Xodjal. Genasid's
chronicle. - B., 1993; Ismailov M. events around the NKAO in
Nizami Tağısoy
370
curve mirror of falsifıcation. - B.,1989 and many others. About
these materials many authors who aren't the Azerbaijani scientist,
aspire to tell the true and doesn't lie, how do it in her monography
B.Z. and authors like her. We see the direct connection between the
history and literary critic. History and literary doesn't suffer the
falsifıcation. According Great Russian critic V.G. Belinski: "Poetry
is true to history, what history fails to save, poetry can save." If you
consistently, purposely will be search withdrawn distort facts in
your literature and in relation creativity Armenians authors, you can
find its much. May be you cheered up spirit, the conscience
torments you. If it is so, tell about it your compatriots - scientist
falsifıcation of a remain history and literature. The time doesn't
wait. It's already moving for you. Regain and try to see the true!
Etnos
v
ə epos: keçmişdən bugünə
371
Nizami Tağısoy
372
Няшриййат директору – проф. Телман ЪЯФЯРОВ
Няшриййат редактору – Ялиш АЬАМИРЗЯЙЕВ
Техники редактор – Мятанят ГАРАХАНЛЫ
Оператор – Кюнцл МУСТАФАЙЕВА
Çapa imzalanıb: 20.11.2010.
Format: 60x84 1/16. Qarnitur: Times.
Həcmi: 23,25 ç.v. Tiraj: 300. Sifariş № 105.
Qiyməti müqavilə ilə.
ТЯРЪЦМЯ
ВЯ НЯШРИЙЙАТ-ПОЛИГРАФИЙА
МЯРКЯЗИ
Аз 1014, Бакы, Рясул Рза кцч., 125
596 21 44; 497 06 25; (055) 715 63 99
e-mail: mutarjim@mail.ru
Dostları ilə paylaş: |