Sirtqi bo`lim ta'lim sohasidagi tadqiqotlar va innovatsiyalar

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar:
1. H. Umirov. Adabiyot nazariyasi, Samarkand, 2001.
2. E.Xudoyberdiev. Adabiyotshunoslikka kirish. Tashkent, 2007.
3. W.Folkner. The Sound and the Fury, 1929.
4. www.ziyonet.uz

THE DEVELOPMENT OF DIPLOMACY

Khamrakulova Ravshanoy Abdulakhatovna ESL Teacher of Correspondence Course, Fergana State University [e-mail]
Annotation: Clarifying the history of diplomatic language and diplomacy is the focus of this article. In addition, the authors give unique details of the speakers' speeches.
Keywords: negotiation, ambassador, oratory, the ability of speech, diplomat, diplomatic language
Аннотация: Прояснение истории дипломатического языка и дипломатии находится в центре внимания данной статьи. Кроме того, авторы приводят уникальные подробности выступлений спикеров.
Ключевые слова: переговоры, посол, ораторское искусство, умение говорить, дипломат, дипломатический язык.
Annotatsiya: Diplomatik til va diplomatiya tarixiga oydinlik kiritish ushbu maqolaning asosiy mavzusi. Bundan tashqari, mualliflar ma'ruzachilar nutqining o'ziga xos tafsilotlarini beradi.
Kalit so'zlar: muzokara, elchi, notiqlik, nutq qobiliyati, diplomat, diplomatik til
Diplomacy is the practice of negotiating and reaching a fair agreement in conflicting national interests. Diplomats are the most important characters of this discipline. They are owners of a powerful tool for making connections with other nations. Definitely, they use eloquent and logically arranged language for moderate worthwhile conversations with representatives of other countries.
The ancient Greek term "diploma," which means "to double," is where the word "diplomat" originates. Ancient Greek diplomats were given stringent instructions before they entered discussions. They negotiated using the boards that were piled on top of them. These panels are known as Diplomas. Initially, historians of the 16th century believed that angels were the first diplomats. since they served as envoys between the earth and heaven. Modern academics, however, disagree with this claim and believe that diplomats have helped to avoid a number of misunderstandings between populations. Ancient Greek diplomacy was notable for its transparency, democracy, public relations, and occasionally, a few white lies. Rome continued to rule dishonestly and become more corrupt. In doing so, it demonstrated the strength of its "divide and rule" campaign to other countries. Then a variety of lies and deceptions-filled diplomacy emerged. This pattern was maintained up until the time of French diplomacy. People then started backing truth-based talks and armistices. People think that if the ambassador was competent and knowledgeable, he wouldn't need to lie. The tradition of paying attention to ambassadors dates back to ancient times. The government appreciated diplomats and their families. They didn't get their personal property inspected when they moved to another state. However, the ambassador would face punishment for attempting to learn the state's secrets. Until a response was obtained, he was either returned to his state or imprisonedThe word "ambassador" initially arose in Italy in the late XII century. It was written in Latin as "ambactiare" (continuation of the duty), and it showed a variety of different runners whom each had a power of attorney. Officials weren't obligated to, but without a document allowing them to act on behalf of another state, ambassadors couldn't persuade a chief. Trade and the Crusades reestablished contacts with the East. Its location brought Venice and Constantinople into contact for the first time. As a result, it adopted the Byzantine diplomatic structure. Byzantium taught Venice how to create a systematic archive and how to offer written instructions to couriers. Later, Venice-Byzantine style developed diplomacy, and the Crusaders and trade built its own prosperity. Slowly, other Italian cities, followed by France and Spain, began to imitate Venetian diplomatic practices.
The advancement of communication and transportation has altered how diplomacy is conducted. Politicians started participating more actively in the negotiations and ambassadors started speaking to them more frequently. Politicians were more active in the diplomatic process in the latter half of the 20th century as a result of meetings and conferences. International organizations were created in this manner. Researchers in historical fiction claim that many authors were skilled diplomats. It goes without saying that this was caused by the fact that they used a variety of terms to convey their ideas. Language is a powerful tool that has the power to change the course of human history. Perhaps this explains why there has been a recent influx of revolutionary literature. Many debate the impact of English becoming a more popular international language. What could constitute a valid justification for a language's designation as an international language? There are a number of potential causes for its development, say experts who are qualified to speak on the matter. On the other hand, languages chosen as diplomatic languages had not been discovered to be widely used by others for lexical resources and significant terms. For instance, eloquence, expressiveness, and shortness of the language.
In many international organizations, English is the official language. The debate should start with representatives from several nations for political, economic, and cultural reasons. This is a crucial instrument for developing ties between their nations. The interpreters would be prejudiced if each party communicated in their native tongue since it would be simpler for their representatives to do so. The multiplicity of languages has led to a greater demand for translators. This made the negotiations somewhat challenging. Spending more time and money was the biggest issue. Thus, for many, the adoption of a single communicative language was advantageous and practical. Members of the United Nations made English their official language following World War I. Some politicians were able to communicate their objectives to the audience in only one statement. Winston Churchill, for instance, stated that "jaw-jaw was better than war-war" to illustrate the essence of diplomacy. He meant to suggest, "Conversation is better than fighting," by saying this.Indeed, every diplomat's primary responsibility is to negotiate while honoring the parties' political, economic, social, and spiritual beliefs. Future ties between the states will be built on the knowledge and expertise of the ambassadors. Therefore, it is advantageous for any diplomat to comprehend language structure accurately and communicate effectively using language.
Should diplomats speak a different language? What should a young diplomat put their attention on in order to succeed? What should translators put their attention on for them? Different people will understand the word "diplomatic language" differently. There are three definitions for the phrase diplomatic language. The first is the language that is spoken as one's home tongue or that one has mastered, the second is the language that one uses to become an expert diplomat, and the third is the particular tenor or style of one's speech. A speech with official status that is significant to the nation is referred to as diplomatic. All statements made on behalf of a state on matters of politics, economy, culture, or national defense are referred to as diplomatic speeches. Diplomacy is the execution of each state's foreign policy and its operations in the area of relations with other nations. Protecting the interests of both the state to which he belongs and the state with which he is negotiating is the principal responsibility of a diplomat. It involves coming up with a solution that both parties can accept. Knowing the language of the host country so signifies high potential and respect in addition to knowing the language of international communication.Through their speech, diplomats are expected to enhance the stature and reputation of their country. The translators will be prejudiced if both parties can converse effectively in the international language. The translator stands out for his dexterity and word-finding abilities. because the translations made orally and in writing will differ. It's a little simpler to write than to interpret. Writing allows you to use your imagination to bring the things you read to life. If you don't like it, you can turn it off, but you must interpret the words swiftly and clearly while speaking orally. Otherwise, both parties will experience difficulties, which would hurt the current negotiations. For this reason, a lot of diplomats study foreign languages. They feel secure and have the chance to speak freely as a result.
Each speech, as we indicated previously, is distinctive. But diplomatic lingo is a little more nuanced. The ambassador asserts that the outcome will determine the future of the two nations. Therefore, it would be beneficial for us to examine the characteristics of this language in greater detail as well as contrast and evaluate the speeches.